Usually I’m on the other side of many of these discussions, arguing use-cases or utility for things that everyone else thinks there’s no demand for. But here, I’m sorry, I have to go the other way.
I do NOT get this. I understand a foldable where a phone converters into an iPad, but this just seems pointless. I mean, look, I DIG it, it’s fun to pretend that your phone is a tricorder, and there is something very satisfying about the snap-close of a flip device - I had a flip phone back in the day, and I loved those aspects of it - but beyond that, WHAT benefit is there here?
If you want a smaller device, you can get the iPhone Air - which notably isn’t selling well (and that’s a phone I actually DO understand the need for - because not everyone who wants a large screen device wants to carry around a brick in their pocket).
If you want a much smaller device get a large Apple Watch with cellular. lol Are you actually telling me that folding an iPhone to half a size of a regular iPhone, while being thicker when folded and having less capability of a regular model is worth anything?!?
I’m glad to hear that Apple is only considering this. My hunch is that they’ll come to the conclusion that this is a super-niche device that they don’t need to bother with.
That said, I’m open to be convinced otherwise - maybe I’m missing something here. I’d love to hear a good rationale for this. Cutting the length of a phone in half just doesn’t seem like enough benefit.
(Maybe this is for the purse crowd? Ladies, feel free to chime in.)