Please define “fair share.” Not only can you not define it, but neither can the politicians/media that spread that propaganda.I think it's safe to call it tax dodging / evasion when the on-off largest company in the world has a smaller tax percentage than your average pensioner. Sure, it's not illegal according to the laws they lobbied (=paid) for but it's also not right. Many global issues could be solved quickly if every top company paid their fair share.
You beat me to it."Bribe" seems to have been misspelled as "investment"
If all they did was make iPhones that would be enough for the US because iPhones are awesome and they make my life better. Thats enough.Are people not reading. Apple missed an investment threshold, the original 10 million probably more than made up for, but it has decided to basically double the original requirement for investment instead.
If you are wondering what Apple does for the USA. A lot. STEM is their primary one where they invest in technology for schools to help young adults learn coding and other tech skills. It is like some people are living under a rock and can’t remember all the investments they do in the US. Apple maintains like a 1 billion dollar program for US companies.
Well if this is Indonesian laws then it's not a shakedown... Apple will have to pay whatever the deal is... When apple works and lobbies it's all good... when a country does something for their interest it's a "shakedown"? Got it.Imagine if every country worked liked this. Prices on everything would skyrocket. This is nothing more than Indonesia shaking down Apple because they can.
And Apple doesn’t dodge taxes. Pay the legally allowed minimum, yes. Work and lobby to make its tax bill as low as possible, also yes. Dodge, no.
And Apple doesn’t dodge taxes.
Holding outside-US revenue in an overseas subsidiary was an extremely common business practice, so much so that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2018 changed US law to require all US companies doing so to repatriate the money, which Apple promptly did. It wasn't sketchy or dodgy.Running revenue into an Irish subsidiary (or w/e the heck they're doin') sure feels pretty "dodgy" to me
They've been hoarding cash overseas after doing this, just waiting for the right USA political climate to allow for repatriation of that money
The whole thing .. dodgy as heck
Saying "you cannot sell your product in our country unless you invest hundreds of millions of dollars you wouldn't otherwise" is absolutely a shakedown and is significantly different than lobbying - which is a company or person working to convince government officials to change laws. The two things are not remotely similar.Well if this is Indonesian laws then it's not a shakedown... Apple will have to pay whatever the deal is... When apple works and lobbies it's all good... when a country does something for their interest it's a "shakedown"? Got it.
Sort of. India requires production %s. So almost any investment goes into manufacturing. Indonesia doesn’t worry about production quotas, but investments. As these investments seem to learn toward education and training.Isn’t this similar with Apple and India?
That’s how it works in some countries and as long as the benefits of paying this greatly outweighs the cost, it’s in Apple’s interest to pay.So it’s a bribe…