But isn't thunderbolt only like 5% the bandwidth of PCI-e x16? Wouldn't you need to use all 6 for one card to have comparable performance?
Yes. PCI-E is 500MB/s per lane. Thunderbolt's 10Gb/s is transported using the much, much bigger PCI-E bus
But isn't thunderbolt only like 5% the bandwidth of PCI-e x16? Wouldn't you need to use all 6 for one card to have comparable performance?
Central heat core, does this remind you of something...?
Image
We have analyzed their attack sir, and there is a danger...
No not happy.
It's like they updated the 'cube' and called it pro.
It's kind of baffling to see so many people embrace this flawed design and claim it as technological progress. Sure it's a faster machine than the current Mac Pro. Not really a hard thing to do when the former Mac Pro hasn't seen a reasonable update in 3yrs.
Today's announcement simply gave us a new Mac Pro with a shorter life span and vastly more expensive upgrade options. That's what bricking your graphics card and making every possible upgrade an external option does - I don't see how so many people rationalize that as a win for the consumer.
In fact I'm a bit disappointed that more people that have been waiting so long to spend their money on this aren't more upset that they have to spend it on something that will give them less and more expensive milage than previous Mac Pro models. I guess that's when you can tell if branding works.
GPU is the first thing that would need to be upgraded. Take a look at the current Mac Pro, IIRC the standard option is a 5770 and it can be upgraded to a 5870. Not even two years later those were considered to be pretty outdated. With the new Mac Pro instead of being able to put in a new GPU for $400-$500 you'd have to buy a whole new computer for several thousand dollars. To me that is not acceptable.
It's kind of baffling to see so many people embrace this flawed design and claim it as technological progress.
You're a so-callled power user, yet you bemoan 4K displays, the definition of a power monitor....
So you're the one still burning CDs lol! I guess you can't just transfer the files over? The rest of the world has moved onto ethernet and general connectivity to network drives, sorry your business is stuck in the past.
Look! It's the Mac Pro X! Just what everyone wanted - a smaller, lighter stationary computer that is only expandable via an expensive cable that no one supports.
We need tools, not shiny cases. I need expandability, not a table cluttered in expensive cables that don't plug into anything. I don't need a smaller, lighter stationary computer. I need more places to put hard drives, video cards and ram as I can afford it. I need a disk drive. Apple is killing me. For what I needed, wanted and waited patiently for so long for - I got not one single thing I can use. I understand trying to be innovative if they've found a new way to make an old tool better - but changing things we've all come to know, love and need into something useless and unrecognizable just for the sake of change is exasperating (see; Final Cut X). Sure, it's pretty. It'll look great under a table every time I accidentally kick it or get my foot tangled up in one of the 20 cables laying in a rat's nest next to it. Looking forward to the clutter of hard drive caddies, a RedRocket card enclosure, the bare LG BluRay writer tethered via a USB cable, the adapter array full of FireWire ports to access cameras and drives containing legacy projects oh, wait, never mind. It also just occurred to me - how am I going to mount that thing in a rack??? How is any of this going to attach to shared storage when I'm gonna have to wait 2 years for a 3rd party to invent an impossibly expensive Fibre channel adapter? Seriously, does anyone there actually use these products when they're designing them or listen to customers - or do they look at the suggestion cards and do the opposite???
Not that any of this really matters because without a working version of Final Cut, I don't need one anyway. So, thanks for saving me a bunch of money I guess? 3 - 4K monitors. For who??? The high school students using FCPX won't be able to afford it, nor will they need that much real-estate to edit YouTube videos.
God help Apple this is a disaster. They do know 'Pro' is short for 'professional' right?
I'm so depressed. I waited for 5 years to get nothing I can use or wanted.
"Apple can't innovate; my a**"
-Phil Schiller
Apple really surprised me today. Really excited for the fall.
Yeah. BluRay is stuck in the past. You do realize some people have giant screens and audio systems at home and don't watch things exclusively on a laptop or a iPad? You're probably the same clown that thinks he needs UHD for a 15" retina display.
Looks nice but what components are user serviceable? RAM (down from 8 slots in predecessor to 4) seems to be serviceable but dual graphics cards and single flash storage slot seem proprietary. I was really hoping for Apple-branded DAS and 4K Thunderbolt 2 Display to complement new Mac Pro.
Do you really need a Mac Pro for audio at this point? It seems a high end iMac would be good enough, especially if most storage will be external anyways. Reality shows depicting recording studios often show iMacs right next to the mixers already."Up to 12 cores." And I have to wonder if they'll offer lesser GPU options, for things like audio those cards would be total overkill.
Can't tell if serious ...