Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Nobody with a brain files in EDTX anymore. WDTX is where it's at now - Judge Albright loves patents and moves cases faster than the PTAB can kill patents. And in any case, as of TC Heartland you can't just file anywhere you want anymore. :p

That aside, the statistics actually don't show that EDTX favors plaintiffs in final outcomes. The judges there are just slightly less likely to dismiss cases prior to trial, but final outcomes are in line with the rest of the country.

How soon do you think corporations will start pulling out of these districts if this continues?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jjm3
The patent system is so broke today. Take, for instance, zooming. You have a touch screen device. If you have it to a toddler, they would probably try to pinch to zoom. However, that is patented. What if I double click, patented. what if a press and drag up, patented. Press and drag down, patented.

It results in companies needed to to asinine things to achieve plan R because plan A-Q, the obvious ones, are patented.

For starters, none of those things are patented, and even if they were, the point of patent law is to protect inventions and motivate new inventions. If you don't like that result then you should get the ball rolling on a Constitutional amendment.
 
Every district in the country applies the exact same law.

They all have different procedures, timelines, etc. and produce statistically different results. And they don’t always apply the same law - there are many questions of patent law that vary from district to district - eventually these get resolved by the Federal Circuit or Supreme Court, but then there are always new differences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jjack50 and subi257
They didn’t “steal” anything, nor were they accused of “stealing” anything. You are infringing hundreds of patents yourself every day - patent infringement doesn’t require that you know that the patent even exists. That doesn’t make you a thief.
Do you hear yourself? So a company takes apple to court and your argument is that they didn't know they were using someone's patent? So Apple fought them in court this whole time and still didn't realize that they were using someone's patent? At which point do you think the riches company in the world w/ tons of lawyers realize, hey, maybe someone own this?
 
Do you hear yourself? So a company takes apple to court and your argument is that they didn't know they were using someone's patent? So Apple fought them in court this whole time and still didn't realize that they were using someone's patent? At which point do you think the riches company in the world w/ tons of lawyers realize, hey, maybe someone own this?
What are you talking about? Which statement that I made was wrong?

1) patent infringement does not require knowledge
2) infringing a patent is not “stealing.”
3) when you fight someone in court it doesn’t mean you “realize that [you] are using someone’s patent.” The whole point of fighting in court is because you have a basis to believe you are NOT infringing the patent, and, until a jury says otherwise, you are presumed to NOT be infringing.
 
I don't have near the knowledge to say whether the lawsuit was honest or not, all I know is that Apple must be a lawyer's haven. They are always either suing or getting sued. There should be some way to check this stuff prior to getting approval to sell. I'm not sure how it would work, but you'd think some independent body would help prevent patent infringement before it gets to this stage.
 
I feel like there should be some kind of stipulation if you don't do something with a patent within a 10 year period (or some time reasonable time frame) you should lose your rights to it.
How about 20 years from the date you first file a patent application? (Keeping in mind that the actual patent might not issue for years after the application is filed)
[automerge]1597185540[/automerge]
Well, I’d probably put mass murderers considerably ahead of them, but, yeah, patent trolls suck big time.
[automerge]1597185009[/automerge]

They’re looking for ways to top Florida.

I think we should rename them “patent karens.”
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ and KeithBN
The people in these juries must be some grade a morons to award millions and billions to patent trolls, time and time again.

When apple sues a small business for a dissimilar , its called defending thier IP.
When another company sues apple and defends their Own IP, the company is called a patent troll.
Funny how that works.
 
Marshall Texas Patent Court.
In other news, PanOptis announced the world's first artificial snow ski resort "Mount Panoptis." The resort, opening summer 2021 in Marshall, Texas, is an engineering marvel as it is built on a man-made mountain not far from the Samsung outdoor Ice Skating Rink. The hollowed out mountain uses a complex refrigeration system (that PanOptis swears infringes on no patents whatsoever) to generate millions of tons of snow, even in the 100 degree summer heat of East Texas. When asked about the cost, a spokesman for PanOptis mumbled something about 50% of $406 million before quickly moving on to talk about their next lawsuit. Film at 11:00.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.