Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd love to hear if and how Apple engineers are directly involved in advancing these technologies, rather than Apple simply being a consumer of them.

Do we know if TSMC works collaboratively with Apple and other companies?

Back in the PowerPC days, Apple worked with Motorola. Remember the Vector Velocity Engine?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Pelham
“Apple's decision to forgo TSMC's more advanced 2nm process for the M5 chip is believed to be primarily due to cost considerations.”

Translated: Apple decided not to pay for TSMC’s production lines to all be upgraded to ASML’s latest chip manufacturing machines at 500m dollars a throw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anakin44011
Two questions I would have:
1. Would the "proposed" 40% tariff on Chinese goods also apply to Taiwanese goods? and
2. By pre-ordering, would Apple avoid those tariffs, if they were enacted?

(trying really hard to keep this non-political... ;) ).
 
Yearly updates of Macs is a bit too much.
Absolutely disagree! I actually liked it better when each Mac product line was updated every 6-10 months back in the early 2000's. Everything was always fresh and the fastest it could be. Apple was on a role, focused solely on the Mac, which was their bread and butter at the time.

2 examples:
The whole Titanium PowerBook series lasted only around 2 years for 4 models introduced (Jan 2001-November 2002).
The Power Mac G4 throughout its whole life was even shorter most of the time with 6-8 months being the norm.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2024-11-29 at 5.44.01 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2024-11-29 at 5.44.01 PM.png
    77.6 KB · Views: 30
  • Screen Shot 2024-11-29 at 5.48.21 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2024-11-29 at 5.48.21 PM.png
    161.5 KB · Views: 32
So, even though N3P entered mass productions 2024 H2, since the M5 was originally planned for N2, M5 will still be released on the later timetable as if it was actually manufactured on the N2 process.

Not only will the M5 not be manufactured on the latest and greatest process, but it will also not be the first on the process that it is using. “The Ultimate Computer” should hopefully be worth the wait, though.
 
I'd be nice if they actually updated *all* the computers though... The Mac Studio & Mac Pro are is still using the M2... will they get the M5? Or or the M4? (Or the M3?)
Studio and Pro will not get M3. M3 is not good at the high-end. The M3 Pro is arguably a downgrade over the M2 Pro. I expect an M4 Ultra to be released for the Mac Studio and maybe Mac Pro eventually.

It’s normal for the higher end chips to come out after the lower end chips. Intel does the same with their Xeon chips coming out after their consumer chips. Not sure why; maybe it’s easier to work the kinks out of the lower-end chips before moving onto the premium chips.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eldho and Chuckeee
Expecting the M5 to debut at WWDC 2025. Don't know what product will be getting it first. Maybe it will be the iPad Pro. Then as usual the Pro MacBooks will be announced in October, followed by the Air in early 2026.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
Not only will the M5 not be manufactured on the latest and greatest process, but it will also not be the first on the process that it is using.
Because it is not clear that TSMC can deliver what they promised, on time, without greatly increasing prices.

So Apple, like any good project engineer, goes about minimizing uncertainty.

For all those addicted to a constant stream of new toys, the progress in microprocessors is slowing again. The future is murky, the physics of the universe is against perpetual progress, and geopolitics may put a squash on many a geek's hot dream.
 
Apple is surely feeling the pressure of Qualcomm. I’m curious if Apple is able to take back the speedcrown.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: kitKAC
I'd love to hear if and how Apple engineers are directly involved in advancing these technologies, rather than Apple simply being a consumer of them.

Do we know if TSMC works collaboratively with Apple and other companies?

Back in the PowerPC days, Apple worked with Motorola. Remember the Vector Velocity Engine?
TSMC is closely working with all partners that let TSMC produce their chips. Apple’s biggest competitor Qualcomm is too, so are many others.

TSMC has the most advanced production facility in the world and is pushing out others who can’t keep up.
 
So, even though N3P entered mass productions 2024 H2, since the M5 was originally planned for N2, M5 will still be released on the later timetable as if it was actually manufactured on the N2 process.

Not only will the M5 not be manufactured on the latest and greatest process, but it will also not be the first on the process that it is using. “The Ultimate Computer” should hopefully be worth the wait, though.
Nvidia, AMD and Intel all cancelled their pre-booked manufacturing capacity for first gen 3nm due to cost. I seriously doubt they're going to spring for 2nm if Apple won't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee and jecowa
Did they lose it? Has Qualcomm come out with SOCs faster and more powerful than the M4 Max?
Not yet, but Qualcomm just released its first risk chip for laptops and surprised everyone with their capabilities. Even outperforming the M3 on many aspects. Wait for the second generation and be surprised 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: uczcret
Not yet, but Qualcomm just released its first risk chip for laptops and surprised everyone with their capabilities. Even outperforming the M3 on many aspects. Wait for the second generation and be surprised 😉
More than happy to be surprised. The more competition the better for us consumers. Hopefully, it keeps Apple from going down the complacent route a la Intel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9081094
So the performance jump of the M5 series over the M4 series is not what has been reported to be minor but “significant “?
I am more interested in the GPU performance increase than anything at lower power consumption. The current roster of chips even at base are are doing remarkably well in holding their own like the m3, m4 base levels but would have liked to see more GPU power at the base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jecowa
TSMC is closely working with all partners that let TSMC produce their chips. Apple’s biggest competitor Qualcomm is too, so are many others.

TSMC has the most advanced production facility in the world and is pushing out others who can’t keep up.

Didn’t Intel get the jump on everyone else by buying up and now installing the latest gen chip making technology High NA UEV? Also, with the Nationalistic push away from China and to bring manufacturing securely back to the USA isn’t Intel positioned to become the new chosen one for American chips and not a vulnerable (and perhaps soon to be lagging behind) TSMC? It may well take a couple of years for Intel to get up to speed pumping out the new tech chips but the reported Billions being pumped into it by the US Government may speed that up.
 
Didn’t Intel get the jump on everyone else by buying up and now installing the latest gen chip making technology High NA UEV? Also, with the Nationalistic push away from China and to bring manufacturing securely back to the USA isn’t Intel positioned to become the new chosen one for American chips and not a vulnerable (and perhaps soon to be lagging behind) TSMC? It may well take a couple of years for Intel to get up to speed pumping out the new tech chips but the reported Billions being pumped into it by the US Government may speed that up.
Buying a high NA EUV means they’re 2ish years from being able to do any type of volume production on it. I don’t think the thing is even assembled yet.

TSMC has also elected to get one (finally), which means late next year they’ll take delivery.

I think Intel is doing great things with backplane power delivery, but TSMC is also innovating as well in the packaging front.

We’re not going to see a direct competition in the low power high performance space between these two for several years at least.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.