If I can't rely on Apple Maps to correctly guide me to my destination, what good is parking data if I never get there?
FIFY
If I can't rely on Apple Maps to correctly guide me to my destination, what good is parking data if I never get there?
I actually think Google Maps has gotten worse and worse lately. It's way too bloated. The app used to launch instantly, now it shows a blank screen too long at first load. The slide-out menu from the left is very unintuitive. Google seems to be more interested in showing me ads than what I am actually looking for.
The only advantage that Google maps has, from a UI standpoint, is I like how the little blip on a map also shows the direction the phone is pointed in, presumably using the compass. Once Apple implements the same thing, I see no reason to keep the Google maps app.
Gross. Last thing a tech company should be doing in 2016 is encouraging more motorists to drive in and park their cars in places where personal cars have no business being anyway. Most cities are actively trying to reduce the amount of cars parked in city centers.
How about implementing something useful like real-time mass transit tracking or real-time bike share station capacity, data for that is already openly provided by companies like the MTA and Atlanta (company behind most bike shares) and freely available.
I find Apple Maps more attractive and easier to use than Google Maps, but GMaps has certain advantages that are undeniable, for example:
- search along the route (eg, for gas stations, food, or lodgings, while in nav mode, and ON the already programmed route)
- display of useful information for some searches (eg price at gas stations, price for lodgings). These may not be perfectly accurate, but they allow you to rapidly scan eg the expensive hotels from the cheaper ones
- pretty much everything related to search (including "unusual" searches like "where do locals eat")
- much more willingness to utilize crowd-sourcing for all sorts of purposes including things like allowing users to easily and rapidly rate establishments and determine favorites. Apple's obsession with privacy is (IMHO) preventing them from handling a number of use cases that they could, at worst, just allow people to opt into.
- Google has a mechanism (lousy and painful, but at least it is there) for establishing way points along the way (eg I want to get from city A to city B but I want to go through National Park C along the way).
It's worth seeing what Google Maps can do today in the hands of someone who is used to the app and uses it aggressively. Apple still has a lot of features to add.
(And, for BOTH of them, it's still really early days. They both, for example, can't tell you where public toilets might be, or where one can mail letters. They both have lousy walking directions. They both have no mechanism for "suspending" a current search or route to open a second page to do something else. They both have lousy and limited abilities to share routes or anything else, let alone plan a joint route together over the internet. They both have no mechanism for anyone to provide a list of "attractions to see along I15 between Las Vegas and LA" sort of feature. etc etc.)
[doublepost=1469647295][/doublepost]Oh forgot to add that Google, right now, handles lack of coverage much better than Apple. They both suck when coverage is not available (they both seem to hold onto basic nav info even with no coverage, but god help you if you try to edit that route while there is no coverage), but at least Google has the ability for you to manually force the download of some material in an area where you think there will be limited coverage.
And of course Google has lane indicators (which of multiple highway lanes to move into for an upcoming turn).
Many of these things I've listed don't seem to matter when you are driving day to day along the same route, but they matter a LOT when you are driving in unfamiliar territory. Apple could solve some of them today, even without requiring huge data collection efforts. For example Apple could be a lot more aggressive in caching data and offering up (perhaps sub-optimal, and with no traffic info) routes even when there is no coverage. And hell, Apple could be using crowd-sourcing and/or telco's maps to WARN you about areas of upcoming no coverage (and preloading data just in case).
Exactly how is that possible? It's realistic for garages because they log free spaces. Random street parking is impossible to trackWhat a crappy update to maps. If they said that they can detect if there's parking on any street, then I'd be impressed. Hard to find parking in my neighborhood.
The only advantage? Google maps tends to get me where I'm trying to go better than Apple Maps which still (too often) fails to do that reliably. I keep trying the latter as it is the default. Sometimes I get where I'm trying to go. Other times I don't and have to fire up Google maps to get to the right place.
This "bad data" thing is fundamental... perhaps the most fundamental part of any mapping app. And it seems it's always "improving" but still always feels like it's a bit behind the accuracy of google maps data.
Flyover, now parking, etc is all cool- and pretty- but fundamentally, I most want to get to where I'm trying to go... and trust a mapping app to do that as often as possible. I'm sure this will be replied by 10 guys who will claim that Apple maps works every single time for them but that's (still) just not my own experience. While Google maps doesn't work 100% of the time either, it feels like it's right much more often (still) than Apple maps.
But he was implying that the gap has become wider, so the Google Maps age has nothing to do with it. The gap is just expanding.Google Maps is eight years older...
Google Maps can show just this little triangle EVERY time you browse a map and you don't have to switch on this "WHOLE MAP ROTATION" thing, which is just too invasive for normal browsing.Wait, doesn't Apple Maps do the same thing?![]()
It's a ******, shady, wacky, limpy, flimsy service.
Parking service company Parkopedia today announced that it will begin to provide its enhanced and detailed parking information services directly within Apple Maps. With the partnership between the two companies, that means iOS users will be able to visit Apple Maps to discover more than 40 million parking spots in 75 countries across North America, Europe, Asia and Latin America.
The integration of Parkopedia into Apple Maps actually began in March inside of the United States, but today marks the official worldwide launch of the new resource. With the parking company's "rich information," Apple Maps users will be able to search for parking garages and lots, while reading about their location, payment type, number of spaces, and more. Future updates will allow users to filter search results, in order to discover the cheapest lots first, for example.
![]()
While reading through some Parkopedia information for a parking lot in Apple Maps, users will be able to follow a link to reserve a spot, although that process takes them out of Maps to complete the payment process on the Parkopedia website or within the company's iOS app [Direct Link]. "More detailed information" will also be available outside of Apple Maps and in Parkopedia itself, including pricing, user reviews, special offers and real-time space availability.
Apple Maps has been receiving steady updates to help bolster its navigation and research abilities for users visiting new cities, or simply trying to find new venues in their hometown. Among these changes coming in iOS 10 are new parked car notifications, which reminds users where they left their car -- especially when parking in large garages or lots -- with the help of a simple geo-locked icon within Apple Maps. Combined with Parkopedia's information catalog, this could help Apple get a leg up on its rivals in the GPS map app space.
Article Link: Apple Partners With Parkopedia to Bring In-Depth Parking Data to Apple Maps
I find Apple Maps more attractive and easier to use than Google Maps, but GMaps has certain advantages that are undeniable, for example:
- search along the route (eg, for gas stations, food, or lodgings, while in nav mode, and ON the already programmed route)
- display of useful information for some searches (eg price at gas stations, price for lodgings). These may not be perfectly accurate, but they allow you to rapidly scan eg the expensive hotels from the cheaper ones
- pretty much everything related to search (including "unusual" searches like "where do locals eat")
- much more willingness to utilize crowd-sourcing for all sorts of purposes including things like allowing users to easily and rapidly rate establishments and determine favorites. Apple's obsession with privacy is (IMHO) preventing them from handling a number of use cases that they could, at worst, just allow people to opt into.
- Google has a mechanism (lousy and painful, but at least it is there) for establishing way points along the way (eg I want to get from city A to city B but I want to go through National Park C along the way).
It's worth seeing what Google Maps can do today in the hands of someone who is used to the app and uses it aggressively. Apple still has a lot of features to add.
(And, for BOTH of them, it's still really early days. They both, for example, can't tell you where public toilets might be, or where one can mail letters. They both have lousy walking directions. They both have no mechanism for "suspending" a current search or route to open a second page to do something else. They both have lousy and limited abilities to share routes or anything else, let alone plan a joint route together over the internet. They both have no mechanism for anyone to provide a list of "attractions to see along I15 between Las Vegas and LA" sort of feature. etc etc.)
[doublepost=1469647295][/doublepost]Oh forgot to add that Google, right now, handles lack of coverage much better than Apple. They both suck when coverage is not available (they both seem to hold onto basic nav info even with no coverage, but god help you if you try to edit that route while there is no coverage), but at least Google has the ability for you to manually force the download of some material in an area where you think there will be limited coverage.
And of course Google has lane indicators (which of multiple highway lanes to move into for an upcoming turn).
Many of these things I've listed don't seem to matter when you are driving day to day along the same route, but they matter a LOT when you are driving in unfamiliar territory. Apple could solve some of them today, even without requiring huge data collection efforts. For example Apple could be a lot more aggressive in caching data and offering up (perhaps sub-optimal, and with no traffic info) routes even when there is no coverage. And hell, Apple could be using crowd-sourcing and/or telco's maps to WARN you about areas of upcoming no coverage (and preloading data just in case).
That thing is always off most of the time though. Been that way since the start. Really useless in that regard.Yes, it does, sort of. In this view, it also rotates the map which I don't like. It doesn't let you have one without the other. I want a north-up map, with a directional icon showing where I am and where I am looking.
It's really a minor point, I use Apple maps when navigating a city 95% of the time now.
Wow! You're still lucky. I live in Poland and I still see search results from across the US instead of nearby.it will still show me locations in states across the US instead of nearby
I, for one, am only too pleased to bow down to the wishes, demands and worldview of my christogold overlord. Oh that we could all suppress our needs and desires and conform to what christogold says they should be.Gross. Last thing a tech company should be doing in 2016 is encouraging more motorists to drive in and park their cars in places where personal cars have no business being anyway. Most cities are actively trying to reduce the amount of cars parked in city centers. How about implementing something useful like real-time mass transit tracking or real-time bike share station capacity, data for that is already openly provided by companies like the MTA and Atlanta (company behind most bike shares) and freely available.
Exactly how is that possible? It's realistic for garages because they log free spaces. Random street parking is impossible to track
This is best feature when you are on a road trip. What is weird is about a year ago I was using apple maps for directions and I was able use siri to get directions to a target (the store) on my route (siri find me a target along my route). Worked great, but I have yet to get it to work again.search along the route (eg, for gas stations, food, or lodgings, while in nav mode, and ON the already programmed route)
Maybe because the local laws or the business regulating/operating the spaces actually do close those spaces @ 10 PM. That's actually fairly common from what I've seenIt's a ******, shady, wacky, limpy, flimsy service.
What they do in my city is pure horror. Apple leave it quickly! Stop integrating some shady services and work on your own back-end.
There are parkings which are open, on open space, pure concrete, no barriers. And it says they are closed after 10 PM, HOW THE F-word it is possible?!?!
Maybe because the local laws or the business regulating/operating the spaces actually do close those spaces @ 10 PM. That's actually fairly common from what I've seen
But that's the thing. They are NOT closed at any time. I have been living here more than 20 years. And those spots haven't been closed at any time, 2AM, 3AM, of any day. It's physically impossible. There are large road entrances, with normal city roads leading to them.Maybe because the local laws or the business regulating/operating the spaces actually do close those spaces @ 10 PM. That's actually fairly common from what I've seen