Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
More useless stuffs that will never see the light of the day....

If this were any other company, member of MR would have labeled these as vapor-ware.

The reality is that for someone who upgrades their iPhone every year, they have already lost the utility the AirPods provide for 1/3 of the useful life of the phone. By the time most customers get these they may have owned their iPhone 7 up to 5-6 months.
 
This is the third post reference the Airpod articles in the last few weeks you keep quoting Apple as "Lying." Read the bolded print in your post above.

Answer Me this. How did Apple lie about a release date when in fact there was not a release date? Apple stated the Airpods had a projected October release, then they advised Tech Crunch they would be delayed for unknown reasons before October ended. They didn't lie about anything.

If you have a source that can prove Apple lied about the Airpods or distracted the customer away from 3.5 Jack removal, then please provide how you know this. Because The way I see it, you, yourself are bitter about the Airpods based off your previous posts and are looking for reasons to disparage against Apple. But that's not Going to fly, being you have no evidence Apple lied about anything.

quit stalking me, it's very creepy
 
quit stalking me, it's very creepy

Wow. Another deflection! Quit spreading deception without proof. It's Clear you have no idea what you're talking about.

Also, stalking wouldn't apply to a public forum. I suggest you revisit the definition of stalking.
 
Last edited:
Since Bragi has been selling their "Dash" earnings for a few months, which already habe a number of these features, I wouldn't expect Apple to be able to patent them. It's hard to patent something which is already on the market. :)

How so? The Airpods are Apple's proprietary product.
 
Since Bragi has been selling their "Dash" earnings for a few months, which already habe a number of these features, I wouldn't expect Apple to be able to patent them. It's hard to patent something which is already on the market. :)

It's quite easy to patent old stuff. Uphold it in court is another thing.

I wonder what sensors could or should be added. Heartrate is obvious but at the same time Apple wants their users to wear the Watch so we already have heartrate. Blood oxygen level, is that reliable from the ear?
 
I wonder what sensors could or should be added. Heartrate is obvious but at the same time Apple wants their users to wear the Watch so we already have heartrate. Blood oxygen level, is that reliable from the ear?
More sensors or backup sensors are always desired.

Often, I remove my AW while at my office desk & put it on when mobile.

At the same time, I have my BT earpiece on while working & removing them otherwise.

It seems that I alternate wearing the pieces depending on the situation.

A blood pressure sensor would be interesting.

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.