You Didn't Get It!
»reduced-size media when possible would reduce shipping, manufacturing, and packaging costs.«
If you ship a sub-notebook or whatever you can give a **** on the difference price for packaging and delivering a mini CD insted of a normal CD. I suppose it even would be more expensive because of the unusual size of media. For shure its not cheaper.
This adaptor comes in two peaces and so it's not much bigger then a mouse. And yes there would have a reduction of pacaging which is at least a third to the package Apple use to ship their Mouses. And yes if they ship a multi-touch-mouse (which patent we saw at the beginning of the year on this board), they would ship it with software for Mac and PC on a mini CD. They would sell masses of this product, and yes costs for pacaging and shipping are very relevant for it.
So what do you think?
»reduced-size media when possible would reduce shipping, manufacturing, and packaging costs.«
If you ship a sub-notebook or whatever you can give a **** on the difference price for packaging and delivering a mini CD insted of a normal CD. I suppose it even would be more expensive because of the unusual size of media. For shure its not cheaper.
This adaptor comes in two peaces and so it's not much bigger then a mouse. And yes there would have a reduction of pacaging which is at least a third to the package Apple use to ship their Mouses. And yes if they ship a multi-touch-mouse (which patent we saw at the beginning of the year on this board), they would ship it with software for Mac and PC on a mini CD. They would sell masses of this product, and yes costs for pacaging and shipping are very relevant for it.
So what do you think?