Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I was messing around the Starbucks app and found the ability to pay with Apple Pay but it won't let me enable it to use it. Only opens up the wallet app when I try to toggle the disable off
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1446643615.213478.jpg
 
I was messing around the Starbucks app and found the ability to pay with Apple Pay but it won't let me enable it to use it. Only opens up the wallet app when I try to toggle the disable offView attachment 598068

Do you have a credit card added to Apple Pay? As I don't see that option in the Starbucks app. (I don't have a credit card added to Apple Pay yet)

I have my region set for US.
 
A debit Visa, you have to open the Starbucks app then
>go to your account & settings (tap on your name)
>Payment Methods and you'll see that option in the Starbucks app and my region is set for Canada though not sure if that make any difference
 
A debit Visa, you have to open the Starbucks app then
>go to your account & settings (tap on your name)
>Payment Methods and you'll see that option in the Starbucks app and my region is set for Canada though not sure if that make any difference

I see it now. Starbucks suppose to accept Apple Pay in 2016 within their app. Maybe they are testing it with certain users?
 
What's interesting though is this.. Take a look at these two sites:

https://www.americanexpress.com/ca/en/content/apple-pay/
and
https://www.americanexpress.com/au/content/apple-pay/

Note that on the Australian page it specifically says bank issued cards do not qualify. On the Canadian page it only says prepaid cards can't be used. This might be due to the fact that only Scotia Bank offers an Amex card so it's not worth mentioning, but it might also be a glimmer of hope that not just Amex is on board in Canada.
 
What's interesting though is this.. Take a look at these two sites:

https://www.americanexpress.com/ca/en/content/apple-pay/
and
https://www.americanexpress.com/au/content/apple-pay/

Note that on the Australian page it specifically says bank issued cards do not qualify. On the Canadian page it only says prepaid cards can't be used. This might be due to the fact that only Scotia Bank offers an Amex card so it's not worth mentioning, but it might also be a glimmer of hope that not just Amex is on board in Canada.

Doesn't it say "
If you don’t have an American Express Card issued by Amex Bank of Canada"

?
 
You have it backwards. It's Apple that's greedy, wanting a piece of each transaction while doing absolutely nothing during a purchase. At most, they deserve a small registration fee for each new card added via their servers, since that's the only time they do anything to earn it.

Worse, Apple wants a ridiculously high amount:

For example, Interac charges its members 0.6 cents per debit transaction. Apple wants 0.5 cents per debit transaction. For doing nothing.

With credit cards, Apple wants 10% of the transaction fees. For doing nothing. To any bank CFO, that's a major hit.

In return, the banks get what? A minor bump in small contactless payments at first. They have little incentive from a security standpoint since they long ago moved to chip & PIN.

If Apple would be happy with just their already huge profits from selling NFC client devices, and not also demand a percentage of each purchase, then banks all over the world would sign up. Instead, Apple leverages its customer base as a product to be sold, something that Cook likes to point at Google for doing.

How did the US banks and the UK banks manage to 'succumb' to Apple's 'demands'?
 
How did the US banks and the UK banks manage to 'succumb' to Apple's 'demands'?

I have heard, though I don't have a source, that the interchange fee in Canada is lower compared to the US. If true, the banks in the US have more to work with.
 
I have heard, though I don't have a source, that the interchange fee in Canada is lower compared to the US. If true, the banks in the US have more to work with.

Still, "succumbing" probably isn't the best word to use here. It's not like Apple could really force them to adopt it if the banks didn't want to.
 
How did the US banks and the UK banks manage to 'succumb' to Apple's 'demands'?

Hmm. You said Canadian banks were greedy for not supporting Apple Pay (and all the fees and info demands that entails). Are you claiming that US and UK banks are less greedy than Canadian banks? That would be surprising, at least for US banks, considering how much more they make from fees than most banks in the world :)

Apple played the major US banks like a fiddle, keeping them in the dark about each other. None of them wanted to not be included. Everything is about being a user's primary card choice.

UK banks came much later, and had far more reason to resist, since their fees are tightly capped, and their contactless fraud costs a fraction (1/20th) of what Apple charges. So there was no monetary incentive to support Apple Pay. Unfortunately for them, they failed to unite, and even Barclays finally had to give in to public pressure.

Canadian banks have learned from the above history, and are (so far) standing together to get Apple to lessen its demands.

Still, "succumbing" probably isn't the best word to use here. It's not like Apple could really force them to adopt it if the banks didn't want to.

Reevans used "succumb", not me. But he's right, the banks gave in to Apple's demands. They certainly didn't approach Apple and volunteer to pay for Apple doing nothing during a transaction, nor to have to give back info they had always considered bank confidential.

Apple asking for a fee per transaction, is basically the same as if the manufacturer of a smart card wanted a piece of each transaction done using one of their cards. They both just provide the client device being used. What Apple is really doing, is selling its customer base. We are part of their product in this case.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
I think all banks are greedy, but if the US banks get a bigger cut to work with, they'll be more likely to play ball. I wonder if the US banks are looking at it two ways. One, in the short term how many people can actually use it (given the limited number of stores that can accept it) as well as merchants upgrading their POS systems (I'm assuming the banks make money in this case?) to accept it.

I really hate this guessing game of whether or not Canadian banks are actually on board yet. I feel until Apple actually has a Canadian Apple Pay page we won't actually know. That TD Canada Trust page about Apple Pay coming soon seemed pretty obvious. I know anyone can make a web site but it seemed fairly detailed for someone just "playing around" at TD.
 
What Apple is really doing, is selling its customer base. We are part of their product in this case.

So? That happens all the time in all sorts of industries, the media being the most obvious one; advertisers are the customers being sold a product (people who tune in). That's likely not as big of a downside to people as you think/hope.

Anyway, based on your posts I have the feeling that even if Apple "gives up" and opens NFC chip access/APIs to anyone who wants to write an app, you'll find some sort of way to try to explain how that's a bad thing. Perhaps not though.
 
So? That happens all the time in all sorts of industries, the media being the most obvious one; advertisers are the customers being sold a product (people who tune in). That's likely not as big of a downside to people as you think/hope.

Absolutely it's not a downside to most people. Look at all everyone who uses ad-supported services. We're surrounded by services that look free, but are paid for by companies who want access to our attention.

Anyway, based on your posts I have the feeling that even if Apple "gives up" and opens NFC chip access/APIs to anyone who wants to write an app, ...

Seriously, how likely do you think it is, that Apple will allow other wallets access to NFC? Apple always denies or cripples direct competition.

... you'll find some sort of way to try to explain how that's a bad thing. Perhaps not though.

I think you're confusing opinions about products, with opinions about motives.

Apple Pay itself is a good thing, not the least because it helped publicize NFC payments and tokenization.

At the same time, it was clearly not implemented solely out of altruistic concerns for customer security, nor was/is that even obviously the highest priority. Selling Apple Pay to banks is.

Of course, banks are also about profit, and they also have boards to answer to. That's all I'm saying: their hesitation is understandable.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.