Cash actually costs them more than credit cards.... merchants actually don't like cash. Thats way they laugh if you ask for a discount if you pay with cash.
It all has to be counted in store at least 5 or 6 times before it makes it in the Brink's bag... and that Brinks truck does not show up for free either.
I wonder if MCX knows that in order for consumers to use their custom mobile payment solution they have to get their beautiful app approved by Google's PlayStore and the Apple's AppStore.![]()
Tomorrow's News: Apple bans CurrentC.
Er, how that that less steps than putting your finger on the scanner and holding it to the NFC terminal? #MathFail
The agreement with the payment processor forbids this.
It's not. It just saves the retailers 2% on transaction fees. They forgot to provide any incentive for customers to use it. Actually, by storing sensitive info in the cloud, they've provided a disincentive.
If you're a retailer selling big ticket items, you either have to get into the lending business (which carries risk and costs) or let the credit card companies do that for you. I know which one I'd choose... the one that limits my exposure. So there's a huge value to accepting credit cards, as evidenced by the fact that just about every retailer on the planet does. As a consumer, I enjoy the added fraud and buyer protection I get from using a credit card as well. All Apple Pay does is make the transaction more secure, which means even LESS chance of a chargeback on the retailer due to fraud. You'd think retailers would love it, not kill it.Well, looks like a crap solution, but you can see why they want to get rid of the card providers. What value exactly do they add to the service? Like so much of (especially Anglo-American) capitalism it's just another layer of parasites making nothing (except money for themselves).
Many gas stations list Cash and Credit/Debit prices. I wonder how they are able to do it.
Well, looks like a crap solution, but you can see why they want to get rid of the card providers. What value exactly do they add to the service? Like so much of (especially Anglo-American) capitalism it's just another layer of parasites making nothing (except money for themselves).
Funny thing is, those companies (CVS, Rite-Aid, Walmart, etc) are going to lose a lot more than $500k in profits over those three years. CVS made $34.6M in revenue, of which over $6M was profit, in just the last quarter. Over three years, that translates to $72M (if all quarters were like the one ending in June 2014, which is probably low-balling it). That $500k is just 1/144th of their profits. That is, if they lose 1% of sales due to refusing to take people's money at the register, they have lost far more than that investment.
From CVS's perspective, though, they see this as a long-shot (now, maybe not when it was first concocted) to get rid of an operating expense equalling about 2% of revenues (assuming most customers pay with credit cards at a convenience store) or $700k per quarter, which would boost their quarterly bottom-line net income ($1.246M last quarter) by more than 50%. Which, of course, is huge. So, you can see their incentive. It is just a really bad bet to make, and clearly anti-consumer, so there is no reason for us, the folks with the money they want, to go along.
The only way this method can succeed would be if the user doesn't understand the implications of using it. Wow...
What does this have to do the the price of tea on China?
Well, looks like a crap solution, but you can see why they want to get rid of the card providers. What value exactly do they add to the service? Like so much of (especially Anglo-American) capitalism it's just another layer of parasites making nothing (except money for themselves).
This antiquated technology will be dead on arrival.
You want people's drivers license, social security number and bank account number?
Lol.