Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Planning 22-Inch Touchscreen iMac for Later This Year?
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well I'm inclined to think (hope) you're right about this particular case. We can't forget that Apple doesn't just do technology, but *implementation* of technology like no one else. There might be a silver lining to this after all.
Although the idea sounds good, without a redesign of the Mac - using a touch screen mac will be very uncomfortable, like other people have already said.
I'm pretty sure that Apple have taken this into account and redesigned as necessary. I hope.
Simply adding multitouch to the existing iMac model - why - if its uncomfortable? Gimmicky. Re-design is necessary.
Myabe the keyboard will become optional, and have the screen like a book - or at a very tilted angle? Think big , unportable, tablet,
I'm pretty sure that Apple have taken this into account and redesigned as necessary. I hope.
Simply adding multitouch to the existing iMac model - why - if its uncomfortable? Gimmicky. Re-design is necessary.
Myabe the keyboard will become optional, and have the screen like a book - or at a very tilted angle? Think big , unportable, tablet,
The Base would have to be a on swinging arm like a flat screen TV wall mount to pull it out and forward so you could touch when you want and have it back a bit when you don't or if it's not in use.
Come up w/ your own ideas, Apple, and stop stealing others. lol
http://www.hp.com/united-states/campaigns/touchsmart/
Just keeping the "Praise Apple" fanboys here humble. I wonder how they'd feel if HP sued Apple over this? Oh, wait... I know!
Now getting serious: Won't work. People are use to having their iMacs a good foot away from them at the far back end of the desk. Imagine how tired your arms would get having to stretch. Imagine how tired your eyes would get to have your iMac a few inches away from your face... besides awkward looking.
1.) Apple, along with their aquisition of Fingerworks, has been a pioneer of such multi-touch technology for many years. HP's implementation is more about gimmick, while Apple's is more about doing something useful. There is a big difference, which will be apparent once the tablet is released. Let's not kid ourselves: the only reason we haven't seen this sooner on Macs is because they wanted it on the tablet first. It has been in the works for a long time. And for what it's worth, there have been touch screens going back much further than HP's effort. Companies have only begun using them again recently because of Apple's successful use of the technology in the iPhone platform.
2.) Apple hires these employees known as industrial engineers. You see, their job is to design something that is beautiful and usuable. I can assure you that you're not the first one bright enough to take into consideration the concerns of using a capacitive touch screen on such a large scale. If they make something that is crap, Steve Jobs will give them hell until it works, and we won't see it for sale a day before that happens. Apple has changed the way people interact with computers before, from the mouse, to the click-wheel, to the multi-touch iPhone interface. I don't see how they couldn't do something similar with a desktop. Especially since going into the future, that seems like the easiest and most natural way to interact with a computer. Minority Report, Star Trek, Avatar? The future begins 2010.
Ok, now on to the tablet: https://www.macrumors.com/2009/11/19/apple-tablet-delayed-with-oled-model-planned-3g-possible/
This new report states 9.7" screen, and the old report above states the 9.7" screen is OLED. Could this be confirmation of OLED in the tablet? If so, I hope that all the outdoor viewing issues have been resolved. I also hope that it costs much less than $2000. I don't see many people buying at that price. I'm sure Apple knows that already, but then does a lower price pretty much guarantee a cheap OLED panel? Which means poor outdoor viewing. All of this nonsense leads me to believe that the tablet won't have OLED. I also don't see Apple fragmenting their tablet device into regular and pro versions this early in the game. Could it happen a couple years down the road? Sure, but not this soon. I'm expecting standard LCD. They would need magic OLED panels to make it a decent price that is viewable outdoors.
I agree. They would have to go back to something similar to the design of the G4 iMac.
I don't think this is happening anytime soon.
That's because many of these other offerings have TV tuners built in. So you get a true multipurpose device.
I was thinking a natal interface with gestures away from the screen. This way small laptops and older iMacs can utilize it.
I could imagine using it for shifting and moving app windows about like in Expose, and also for selecting most common used app menus like copy paste print etc. I imagine this could work really well if it is done well. There are times when i use a computer and have many windows open that i wish i could just reach out and resize and move them instead of having to use a mouse
Until someone can answer why a touchscreen interface on a 20+ in. display would be better than a keyboard and mouse, it won't happen. Even as a supplement to the keyboard and mouse, I don't see the use for a touchscreen display. I don't think this rumor is very credible.
What if touch OSX is the future of OSX?
Imagine this timeline:
Jan 27: Apple introduces Tablet(s) with touchscreen (+multitouch on back). Awesome new 3-D interface (touch the front of the screen you work on the foreground, touch the back and you work on the background). Awesome handwriting recognition. Camera thingy integrated into the screen as per their patent. Announces SDK for both tablet and iphone apps.
April/June/July: New iphone/ipod touch with multitouch front and back, integrated camera thingy.
Q3: Apple introduces new iMac - where the "chin" of the iMac is the dock for the detachable 22-inch tablet. Super thin so that it too can be taken around as a large tablet with same 3-D interface, multitouch front and back, sensing display, and handwriting.
Also introduce MacBook Pro line up with multitouch options. And Free standing displays (adjustable for ergonomic effect) for use with Mac Pros.
The important thing is that any big display is adjustable in much the same way as the lamp iMac so that it can be ergonomically used for touch in general and handwriting in particular.
Any takers?
Imagine this timeline:
Jan 27: Apple introduces Tablet(s) with touchscreen (+multitouch on back). Awesome new 3-D interface (touch the front of the screen you work on the foreground, touch the back and you work on the background). Awesome handwriting recognition. Camera thingy integrated into the screen as per their patent. Announces SDK for both tablet and iphone apps.
April/June/July: New iphone/ipod touch with multitouch front and back, integrated camera thingy.
Q3: Apple introduces new iMac - where the "chin" of the iMac is the dock for the detachable 22-inch tablet. Super thin so that it too can be taken around as a large tablet with same 3-D interface, multitouch front and back, sensing display, and handwriting.
Also introduce MacBook Pro line up with multitouch options. And Free standing displays (adjustable for ergonomic effect) for use with Mac Pros.
The important thing is that any big display is adjustable in much the same way as the lamp iMac so that it can be ergonomically used for touch in general and handwriting in particular.
Any takers?
Yes. This would be Apple's way of doing things...even to the point of having all the gestures be sensed by the camera or the screen itself within a certain range. Perhaps this is where that patent for the "camera" built into the pixels of the screen itself comes into play. Eliminates the smudgy screen problem which Steve wouldn't stand for (me neither!), and introduces a whole new level of cool.
Will the Tablet be the first to demo these gestures with its "surprising" interface?
I kid you not that when I first got my unibody macbook, I would occasionally reach out to touch the screen before catching myself.
The canny attraction is gestures rather than actual interaction. Just to be able to swipe between Spaces instead of using the damned keyboard would do it for me. I love the MBP trackpad; it's my favourite new feature without question, and choice can only make iMacs more desirable rather than less.
You guys aren't using your imagination.
A 22" inch TouchiMac of course won't be used in the current form and would be really sucky.
I imagine it to be like a big tablet on a stand. So that the biggest part of the screen is underneath your hands, like a laptop keyboard. And then you can change the angle of the device between parallel to the surface, and being upswept.
That way it'd be quite useable.
A 22" inch TouchiMac of course won't be used in the current form and would be really sucky.
I imagine it to be like a big tablet on a stand. So that the biggest part of the screen is underneath your hands, like a laptop keyboard. And then you can change the angle of the device between parallel to the surface, and being upswept.
That way it'd be quite useable.
![Screen-Cleaning-Technology.jpg]()
You saw it here first.
Which view is that in iPhoto? Or is it a fullscreen Coverflow variation in the Finder window?
A touchscreen is better than a keyboard and mouse for specific applications and uses. I don't think it is out to replace the regular usage of a keyboard and mouse, but rather target a specific (niche) market. Maybe interactive learning applications for children or a photo library for an event planner. I personally have no use, nor does many people here it seems, but there is a market out there for it.
Stop 
! This type of design in an ergonomic disaster!!!
The only way I can envision it working is if the iMac is actually laying flat (or almost flat) on its back. ( i.e. something akin to MS Surface). Otherwise, a far better option is to bundle the iMac with a keyboard equipped with a large (say 7") LCD trackpad.
! This type of design in an ergonomic disaster!!!The only way I can envision it working is if the iMac is actually laying flat (or almost flat) on its back. ( i.e. something akin to MS Surface). Otherwise, a far better option is to bundle the iMac with a keyboard equipped with a large (say 7") LCD trackpad.
We won't see touchscreen iMacs anytime soon. Your arm would be so full of pain after 10 minutes of use. A touch keyboard I can see happening this year but seriously, touchscreen computers are useless for normal use.
I couldn't agree with you guys more.
HP's process: let's add a touchscreen to our all-in-one iMac ripoff!
Apple's process: how can we fundamentally change how people interact with their computer, while making it easier, intuitive, and less time consuming?
As a side note, as the iPhone has become more popular, there have been more and more Windows users on this site. Its getting a bit annoying how they love their iPhones, but love bashing Apple's other efforts, which have a lot to do with what made the iPhone possible. They can have their crappy HP TouchSmart TM2T or whatever, I just don't want to hear about it all day long. This is MACrumors.
Interesting quote from that HP model's description:
I doubt they would even be calling this a "slate" if that wasn't the rumored name for Apple's tablet device.