Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Absolutely! 100%!!! If I want to listen to a podcast, why on earth should I use a program that is packed full of buttons and menus that have NOTHING to do with podcasts? It makes doing every function much worse. iTunes is an okay jack of all trades, but a master of none.

There is NO good reason for wholly separate activities to all be crammed into a single piece of software. If I want to listen to an MP3, why on earth should I have to hunt through menus and/or icons that perform functions for renting movies and syncing phone apps? It makes no sense and it makes the software worse at every single job it's in charge of.

The apps for entirely separate uses should be allowed to flourish in its own separate application. But at the same time the separate apps will naturally be functionally interoperable so that they work with each other seamlessly on the few occasions when it's required.

For example, Pages, Numbers, and Keynote are all separate apps because they're all mainly separate activities. This allows the apps to excel at the job they're designed to accomplish. Yet when you need the apps work with each other they do it super easily. This is exactly what makes sense for the entirely unrelated jobs that are currently all crammed into itunes.

Do you even listen to yourself?
 
This is well due, each time I look at the iTunes icon.....I can feel an update coming.

Since switching to Spotify I haven't used iTunes as a player since...I still buy some songs and albums from there though & play them through Spotify.
Don't know why really, iTunes is much better...you can loop a single song, have EQs, sound-check, sort by Genre etc

But I love the social side of Spotify.
 
Two very different things

Spotify and iTunes I mean.
Despite the absolute certainty of many posters at both ends of the spectrum my use of surely isn't untypical. Spotify is, for the most part, a research tool - try a track, discover a new artist, sample an album, etc. iTunes is where I go to buy the stuff that makes it through the filter. Unlike many I really do want to own my music - I mean I can see streaming has a place and for some it is all they will ever need but, for me, there is still a direct link between me & the artist if I actually buy their product.
On the main topic iTunes really does need a root & branch update - I can't say I care whether it is split up or kept together the main thing has to be ease of use and it is failing across all platforms in that respect.
iCloud seems to have a lot of detractors but I like the idea. iTunes Match is a complete wonder. Both need some serious attention in terms of presentation and access but I am pretty confident that is in the works.
 
Apple's iCloud efforts will improve organization of users' own content while also the company is also considering splitting out some functions of iTunes as it did yesterday on iOS with its new Podcasts app.

iTunes is the MTV of software. In the beginning, it was about the music. They put a store in. Then came the tv shows, the movies, the books, the apps. Suddenly, music was the last thing on Apple's mind, except to put in new ways to drive you to their store. Now it seems they're on the Spotify tip, a service which only seems to make major labels money, not indie artists.

I for one hope that they put the store into a separate iStore app, and just make iTunes...about the music again. And bring some innovation to music playback. We still have no good way to tag songs, unless we appropriate other metadata fields. We still don't have lossless music, or the ability to buy vinyl copies of records with digital downloads.

Indie bands have no way to communicate with music purchasers. Apple should be taking the Bandcamp.com model and running with it. Empower indie artists and give customers more options. Help create relationships between musicians and fans. But no, they are stuck in an outdated mindset.

----------

But I love the social side of Spotify.

Well, we all know how Ping turned out!

Unfortunately, Apple doesn't 'get' social. Or if they do, they fought against it, because they didn't really provide social in Ping. They just used it as an attempt to drive people to their store. They never really cared about people interacting with each other; they just saw users as consumers. But I guess they finally realized people didn't want to use such a lifeless service, and instead of improving it, they just plan to shut it down. Which makes me think that they just don't get it.
 
Great, my PowerMac G5 doesn't support iCloud anyway... If that means that the next version of itunes won't be available for PPCs I'll be very pissed.
Yes, I do have a MacBook Air, but the G5 still remains a computer where I store all my stuff and I ain't gonna change it.

Regardless, while we are at it, what about adding a possibility to sort music by label and to add a second artist, so I could get rid of all that "feat. someone" BS. The song would be then sorted under both original and featured artist. Nothing more I can think of right now...
 
Since I have discovered Spotify months ago I have not even accessed my music through iTunes. Subscription for me has been a far better option for discovering new music and listening to whatever I want, whenever I want. iCloud for me has also been a big disappointment - it works spoty at best. I don't think a new UI will bring me back to Purchasing music through iTunes - at some point in time Apple is going to need to move to a subscription model - I am sure that I am not alone.

That's what happened to me too, I've moved to subscription and Spotify, so much better. Apple is going to have to answer to that, sooner or later. I think that a redesign using the old model is just a waste of time.
 
I don't want everything in the cloud and I don't want to stream music. I'm old-fashioned and I want everything offline on my own machine. Yes I'm from Belgium and yes an internet connection is way to expensive to transfer this amount of data.
 
Will the new version be able to JUST play music?

Serious question.

I'd have to say "no frikking way". :) It'll have to play every content sold in store. Please not a separate Videos app. We already have Quicktime which can play iTunes DRM content. If they want to have a separate app for video content, they should update Quicktime Player to interact with the iTunes library instead of introducing a 3rd app. And so far nothing indicates that the QT player in ML has features like that.
 
Absolutely! 100%!!! If I want to listen to a podcast, why on earth should I use a program that is packed full of buttons and menus that have NOTHING to do with podcasts? It makes doing every function much worse. iTunes is an okay jack of all trades, but a master of none.

There is NO good reason for wholly separate activities to all be crammed into a single piece of software. If I want to listen to an MP3, why on earth should I have to hunt through menus and/or icons that perform functions for renting movies and syncing phone apps? It makes no sense and it makes the software worse at every single job it's in charge of.

The apps for entirely separate uses should be allowed to flourish in its own separate application. But at the same time the separate apps will naturally be functionally interoperable so that they work with each other seamlessly on the few occasions when it's required.

For example, Pages, Numbers, and Keynote are all separate apps because they're all mainly separate activities. This allows the apps to excel at the job they're designed to accomplish. Yet when you need the apps work with each other they do it super easily. This is exactly what makes sense for the entirely unrelated jobs that are currently all crammed into itunes.

I admit that I used to roll my eyes when people talked about iTunes being bloated, but over the past year I've changed my mind. Jamming all types of media into the one app just isn't very user friendly. It's fine if you don't have a lot of content in iTunes, but if you have a lot it's just a pain trying to access it.

For instance, I have about 10 different desktop spaces set up, including one for iTunes and another for document creation and reading. I have a lot of PDFs in iTunes for syncing to my iOS devices. If I'm in word and I want to open one of these PDFs I have to navigate to my music desktop, and navigate through a music app to find it, and then navigate back, and do this each time I want another to open another one of the PDFs [yeah, I know use spotlight, but that will only work if you know the name of the file]. It's silly and clumsy. They need to split the books section into a separate app.

They should also make a separate podcast app. I like to listen to music while I'm cooking, working out etc. But if I want to quickly check a cooking or fitness podcast, I can either 1) watch it in iTunes [which will stop the music playing], and then I have navigate back into music and find what I was listening to, and then find the spot in the track that I was listening to it or 2) click on the podcast and choose show in finder and then open it in quicktime. Again it's just unnecessary steps arising from a clumsy implementation, and its what happens when you jam everything into the one app.

I think your iWork example is spot on. If you combined all 3 into 1 it would be a mess. They are good apps because each focus on what it needs to focus on, and plays nicely with each other. iTunes should be the same. Unfortunately, I fear that rather than splitting iTunes up into 3 or 4 apps, they'll probably just jam more features into it instead.
 
Last edited:
That hideous yellow bar at the top of iTunes better be gone. It looks like an old gameboy dot matrix screen.

I also would love some color back in the sidebar, but seeing how Aperture just went grayscale (which makes even less sense than iTunes or Finder), I doubt that is happening.

I am in favor of the split apps. iTunes is too bloated. Let the apps control their files like they do in iOS. Bookstore app, Video app, Music app, etc...

Let iTunes just sync and be the store.
 
*yawns* must be recycle rumours day!

This has been said for months and while i'm sure an overhaul is in the works... is there any point repeating rumours from last year... again?
 
Another vote here for not splitting up more apps.

I already hate the address book, calendar and mail are 3 separate apps taking up 3 spots on the dock. Apple should look no further than outlook and combine those into 1 app. There's no good reason those apps should be all standalone.
 
Last edited:
You're example shows a TV Show. You can use the Video tab and label it by Show, Season Number, and Episode Number as you wish. The episode title can go under Name in the Info tab.

Yeah I know, but an actual, full-length movie uses the same fields.
 
Having an "Apple" folder on an iPad makes as much sense as having a corner in your bookshelf reserved for Warner Bros movies, or a "Sony Music" CD shelf.

Nope, I have an Apple folder for all the default **** I hardly use too.

----------

Speaking of them all being separated into different apps, can they at least
Make a ping app?

Ping's dead lol, We found the only Ping user! nice to meet you!

----------

Ugh, I HATE newsstand. I have it on its very own, unused, wasted home screen so I don't have to see it and mistake it for iBooks.

Exactly, I do too lol.
 
Nope, I have an Apple folder for all the default **** I hardly use too.

----------



Ping's dead lol, We found the only Ping user! nice to meet you!

----------



Exactly, I do too lol.

We need to organize a million user march to Cupertino to take ping off!
 
Iphone/ Ipad syncing

I'd be happy if itunes stopped insisting it want to delete all files on my iphone.

conversation with itune

me: "add audio book"
itunes :"adding audio book will delete all music and videos from iphone whould you like to continue"

me : "no"

Me sync music : "sycing music will delete all music videos and apps would you like to conitune"

me: -_- "No"

Me " authorise my computer now i must be able to sync"

itunes : "syncing iphone with computer, all apps and media have now been deleted"

Me : "FFFFFFFFFF UUUUUUUUUUUUUU"
 
Spotify does have the "offline" mode option. You can store up to 3,333 songs and listen to them without an internet connection.

So it is possible to use Spotify on your smartphone and not use even 1MB of data.

as for Usage charge, Comcast has a 300GB monthly limit. Even if you stream spotify 24 hours a day for 31 days, it would only be a fraction of that 300GB limit.

This is how we use spotify in the sprinter household. 2 iPads, 2 iPhones and a mac. It's ace for the price of 1.5 albums a month..

Even stream it round the house with the help of airfoil and the speaker app..
 
i'd be happy if itunes stopped insisting it want to delete all files on my iphone.

Conversation with itune

me: "add audio book"
itunes :"adding audio book will delete all music and videos from iphone whould you like to continue"

me : "no"

me sync music : "sycing music will delete all music videos and apps would you like to conitune"

me: -_- "no"

me " authorise my computer now i must be able to sync"

itunes : "syncing iphone with computer, all apps and media have now been deleted"

me : "ffffffffff uuuuuuuuuuuuuu"

i know right?!
 
Since I have discovered Spotify months ago I have not even accessed my music through iTunes. Subscription for me has been a far better option for discovering new music and listening to whatever I want, whenever I want. iCloud for me has also been a big disappointment - it works spoty at best. I don't think a new UI will bring me back to Purchasing music through iTunes - at some point in time Apple is going to need to move to a subscription model - I am sure that I am not alone.

Yep i can't remember the last time I used iTunes. I use Spotify and Pandora every day.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.