Pfft, they have a giant store in the middle of Sydney. They can afford one in Hong Kong.
And NY and London, and Paris and..
Pfft, they have a giant store in the middle of Sydney. They can afford one in Hong Kong.
Will a Taipei store count as one of the 25?
Actually I think Apple has a long way to go to improve their marketshare in Asia, and they need more than just Apple Stores to do that.
First and foremost is the lack of content, more specifically iTunes content.
Here in Asia iTunes has no songs, ring tones, movies, or TV shows. So the amazingly rich multimedia experience that people get in the States isn't really here.
Will each store have shelves of pirated software? Perhaps they will not be actual Apple stores, but Apple-store knockoffs.![]()
As the economist Peter Schiff has repeatedly stated, once China stops borrowing billions of dollars to us so that we can buy the products they make, and starts keeping it to themselves so their own citizens can actually buy their own products , we are hosed. But hey, they deserve to use the stuff they are actually making over there!
There's also the whole sentiment about "a rising tide lifts all boats" to consider here. The USA is already shooting itself in the proverbial feet by borrowing so much money. We're setting ourselves up for hyper-inflation and a massive economic crash. So THAT is where I see us being "hosed", really ... not directly because the Chinese would reach a stage where their average citizens are able to buy and use the products they produce for others.
In the *long* run, I think it might turn out to be a good thing for the USA if the rest of the world makes strides towards their people rising to the standard of living we've enjoyed, vs. the current situation which seems to be all about the typical U.S. citizen accepting a LOWERED standard of living, so the nation can be "more like the rest of the world".
"attendees were not permitted to bring communication devices into the meeting"
You can't be serious about this? Shareholder meetings are run by the normal private property rules, but not in a million years would a company here EVER dictate to shareholders not to bring in their phones. I'm sorry but that is unheard of, and I for one would bring in whatever I damn well choose to bring in. Apple, leave the command and control stuff to governments, who do it better than you.
I don't buy that at all. These are obviously shareholders who have agreed to certain rules at certain meetings. Private property rules circumventing company law resolutions? Never heard of anything like it.
Me too.I hope they build an Apple Store in Taipei, but at the same time, I'd rather it not be one of the 25.
Pfft, they have a giant store in the middle of Sydney. They can afford one in Hong Kong.
So that you can say I bought my overpriced PC in a "cool" looking store?
Why can't they build more in Australia and build at least one in New Zealand.![]()
"attendees were not permitted to bring communication devices into the meeting"
You can't be serious about this? Shareholder meetings are run by the normal private property rules, but not in a million years would a company here EVER dictate to shareholders not to bring in their phones. I'm sorry but that is unheard of, and I for one would bring in whatever I damn well choose to bring in. Apple, leave the command and control stuff to governments, who do it better than you.