Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There's a few factors to look at here, before trying to draw any conclusions.

Firstly, OLEDs are expensive (no matter what the theory) - $2499 at Amazon for an 11" Sony television. Apple doesn't even make a screen that small (rumoured netbooks aside) and they certainly don't pay that price for a monitor, not even the 30". Smaller OLEDs are much cheaper, so iPhone/iPod Touch devices might appear in the next 12 months, but you can forget even a 10" OLED netbook in the foreseeable future.

Secondly, Apple hasn't made the transition to LED monitors yet. That technology is not widespread in the (Windows) computer world and nowhere cheap enough for Apple's preferred margin to be applied.

Thirdly, Apple's product development time is said to be 2 years. They put a team on "gutting and redesigning" the Mac Mini May last year and we still haven't seen the results of that yet, so 2 years seems to be correct.

So in the next year we can expect OLED to appear in maybe small touch devices, not a netbook.

LED displays might make it to iMac, more than 12 months away. They just seem to be too expensive at the moment. See how common they become in the wider computer community in the next 12 months.

With the 30", Apple's in a sky's-the-limit situation, selling mostly/initially to professionals who will pay whatever it costs to get a better monitor. Even so, a LED will be $5000 and OLED is out of the question.

Except small Touch devices, OLED looks to be 2 years away, which is consistent with Apple's product cycle - buy OLED now, release the product in 2 years when the price of the displays has fallen to a point it can be included in iMacs, say.

That leaves MacBooks - which actually have made the transition to LED, but the prices of >11" OLED displays frankly put them nearly 2 years away in MacBooks, maybe a high end option (15", 17") in built to order, but not for a year or more.

And lastly, and most disturbingly, OLED television technology has remained pretty much unchanged in nearly 2 years, compared with LCD which has almost squeezed out plasma (not for technical superiority, but on price alone). LED televisions are nowhere near common and OLED televisions are still a curiosity, not showing any signs of mass production (you can't count an 11", I'm sorry). And I haven't even canvassed life span and reliability, but that's probably why the technology seems to have stood still - working out the bugs. Sony did jump very early on OLED and increased expectations about OLED's arrival in the marketplace.

I'm not holding my breath. There was a lot of disappointment in the iMac/Mini releases this year. Apple isn't moving ahead anywhere near as fast as the fans would like it to.
 
Interesting point of view but wrong on multiple counts.

There's a few factors to look at here, before trying to draw any conclusions.

Firstly, OLEDs are expensive (no matter what the theory) - $2499 at Amazon for an 11" Sony television. Apple doesn't even make a screen that small (rumoured netbooks aside) and they certainly don't pay that price for a monitor, not even the 30". Smaller OLEDs are much cheaper, so iPhone/iPod Touch devices might appear in the next 12 months, but you can forget even a 10" OLED netbook in the foreseeable future.
First off you have no idea why that Sony TV is priced the way it is. Just because the appliance is high priced you can not infer that the parts inside are expensive. Considering we are talking about Apple here I'm surprised that that people would try to associate sticker price with the value of the internals.

As to the iPhone, OLED have been in use for some time on cell phones. In any event if Apple has already paid up front for a production line and if that line is for OLED screens, then we can expect them at a reasonable price.
Secondly, Apple hasn't made the transition to LED monitors yet. That technology is not widespread in the (Windows) computer world and nowhere cheap enough for Apple's preferred margin to be applied.
That is one point of view and could be valid. On the other hand LG might have finished the R&D required to transistion to mass production. Apple simply might not think that LED backlight screens are worth transistioning to.
Thirdly, Apple's product development time is said to be 2 years. They put a team on "gutting and redesigning" the Mac Mini May last year and we still haven't seen the results of that yet, so 2 years seems to be correct.
What do you call the latest Mini? The Mini is an established product so engineering is far more focused when it is updated.
So in the next year we can expect OLED to appear in maybe small touch devices, not a netbook.
I wouldn't even want to wager on this and I've been tracking the tech for a couple years now. Many have been projecting a transition to OLED this year.
LED displays might make it to iMac, more than 12 months away. They just seem to be too expensive at the moment. See how common they become in the wider computer community in the next 12 months.
Actually I'm thinking laptops first, mostly because because of the strengths that OLED have. That is the low power and thinnest work well in laptops.
With the 30", Apple's in a sky's-the-limit situation, selling mostly/initially to professionals who will pay whatever it costs to get a better monitor. Even so, a LED will be $5000 and OLED is out of the question.
A good question here is what makes an LED backlight screen so expensive? Technically nothing as white light LEDs are commonly available. The control circuitry is simple and certainly no worst than that required for flourescents. LEDs even have advantages that can be implemented.

In anyevent the expense of LED backlight has nothing to do with the cost of the components inside. Not at this point anyways, as long as demand outstrips production and people are willing to pay we will have very expensive LED back lite screens. Expensive LED screens are just what the manufactures want right now, it is good for the bottom line to sell cheap stuff at a high prices.
Except small Touch devices, OLED looks to be 2 years away, which is consistent with Apple's product cycle - buy OLED now, release the product in 2 years when the price of the displays has fallen to a point it can be included in iMacs, say.
Huh?
That leaves MacBooks - which actually have made the transition to LED, but the prices of >11" OLED displays frankly put them nearly 2 years away in MacBooks, maybe a high end option (15", 17") in built to order, but not for a year or more.
Maybe maybe not. I'm just trying to understand Apples relationship with LG. I just can't imagine them giving all that money to LG with out some sort of exclustivity to a new product. Other wise why not buy off the shelf.
And lastly, and most disturbingly, OLED television technology has remained pretty much unchanged in nearly 2 years, compared with LCD which has almost squeezed out plasma (not for technical superiority, but on price alone). LED televisions are nowhere near common and OLED televisions are still a curiosity, not showing any signs of mass production (you can't count an 11", I'm sorry). And I haven't even canvassed life span and reliability, but that's probably why the technology seems to have stood still - working out the bugs. Sony did jump very early on OLED and increased expectations about OLED's arrival in the marketplace.

I'm not holding my breath. There was a lot of disappointment in the iMac/Mini releases this year. Apple isn't moving ahead anywhere near as fast as the fans would like it to.

Well you got the iMac part right! The Mini was pretty much what I expected. What we need to ask is why, especially the lack of LED back lighting.



Dave
 
No way that's gonna happen the OLED producers just want it to be like that.

Consider that the Sony OLED 11" TV costs around $2000 at the moment.

I think it'll be a few years yet before we see OLED Macs or monitors from Apple.


The price for this tech is still way to high, maybe, just maybe in the iPhone iPod, no no way it's coming to iMac's or displays anytime soon.
 
yess

LED are out dated
OLED are better in every way. i don't see apple applying this technology on the iMac but, i do see them introducing this technology on iPod and the iPhone

i could see OLED in a Mac book

but who knows
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.