Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,366
40,395


With the iPhone 17 models now rolling out in Australia and New Zealand, Apple has shared a new ad for the iPhone 17 Pro on its Australian YouTube channel.


The spot features a film director using an iPhone 17 Pro to film in a range of messy conditions, with the iPhone exposed to all mud, snow, and more. The ad will likely be added to Apple's other YouTube channels tomorrow.

The iPhone 17 Pro has a three-lens camera system, with a trio of 48-megapixel lenses. The new Telephoto lens features 4x and 8x optical zoom options. Apple added new features designed for professional filmmakers, and in the caption of the video, Apple says that the iPhone 17 Pro has the "most cinematic camera" that Apple has ever made.

Article Link: Apple Promotes iPhone 17 Pro in New Ad
 
Unapologetically Aluminum
OIP.5BPEw237Z7TRdyxH2WUH0gHaEK
 
iOS 26 is not very good to start. Using it over the last few days, I've had calls ring while on silence, set a timer that doesn't go off, and face ID is very buggy. I consistently have to try multiple times to unlock the phone. It usually goes to a blank page view or a pin code prompt when I try to unlock my iPhone 13 Pro. It never did this until iOS 26. So disappointed in Apple. I pre-ordered iPhone 17 Pro, but this experience is making me think about returning it and moving to Android. I hope the experience improves running on the new phone or updates improve the software here soon.
 
Fortunately, Apple didn't try to advertise the camera system. That would have been embarrassing.

The 8x telephoto lens, for example, is on par with the iPhone 4 standard lens from 2010 in terms of photo quality (without AI optimization, of course)
 
Yeah, it's actually way more complicated to work with an iPhone professionally than they make it sound. There's realistically no scenario where a production chooses to shoot on iPhone vs traditional equipment without some sort of sponsorship or help/request from Apple directly.
The scenarios are right in the ad: dust, snow, rain. So to remind people it is IP68 protected. Finally they have embraced more or less true ad and didn’t submerge it into a pool full of water or some sort of “action jumps” from cliffs into ocean somewhere in Hawaii.

No “professional” rig can go that far. Or yeah, it can. But cleaning and repairing will cost more than just buying a new device.

Smartphones (not just iPhone, lots of them) are becoming an ultimate on-the-go filming device for influencers, bloggers (especially travel ones), and other types of creative professionals. With addition of LOG footage it unties hands even more and lets directors choose their desired coloring and white balance.

As for making it work professional, actually it is much cheaper than one might think at first. In the ad they have showed “the endgame setup”: expensive frames, tripods, stabilizers. Nowadays all that stuff can be found for reasonable money, just from different brands.

I remember how I got my Zhiyun stabilizer for iPhone. I almost never use it thanks to built-in stabilization and my laziness but it works better than built-in stabilizer for Osmo Pocket 3, i.e. cinematic-level quality. Making movies on smartphones these days is not a fever dream but reality! You lose some bitrate here, some resolution there but at the end of the day you get watchable “something”.

Back in the days David Lynch (R.I.P.) shot his Inland Empire fully on digital Sony camcorder. Back in 2006 it was unheard of because digital could barely go to 480p, and film looked much better. But Lynch himself liked to say that “film is dinosaur” and digital workflow is much straightforward. Nowadays we have moved to new digital frontier: portable digital with 4K and 8K quality and studio apps for editing at the palm of your hand
 
Last edited:
I hope they could return to Titanium, Stainless Steel or come up with a new material like copper for better heat transfer, just don't use aluminum, it feels so cheap for a 1099-dollar phone
 
Smartphones (not just iPhone, lots of them) are becoming an ultimate on-the-go filming device for influencers, bloggers (especially travel ones), and other types of creative professionals. With addition of LOG footage it unties hands even more and lets directors choose their desired coloring and white balance.
Those types are not filmmakers or even professionals by the term used in the movie business.

Back in the days David Lynch (R.I.P.) shot his Inland Empire fully on digital Sony camcorder. Back in 2006 it was unheard of because digital could barely go to 480p, and film looked much better. But Lynch himself liked to say that “film is dinosaur” and digital workflow is much straightforward. Nowadays we have moved to new digital frontier: portable digital with 4K and 8K quality and studio apps for editing at the palm of your hand
Not sure if you were there but I was and full hd cameras (1920x1080) were available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: foliovision
Not sure if you were there but I was and full hd cameras (1920x1080) were available.
Sorry. Should have better said “most consumer digital cameras”.

2005-2006 was indeed when first professional 720 and 1080i cameras started to appear. But I believe they were much more expensive than casual consumer Sony camcorders on the market, meant to be used by people going to vacations.

I was there but I was a kid and had only 640x480 on new (back then) Sony cameras. Despite small resolution quality was quite good!
 
I hope they could return to Titanium, Stainless Steel or come up with a new material like copper for better heat transfer, just don't use aluminum, it feels so cheap for a 1099-dollar phone

Hardly surprising aluminum is disappointing. It's is for the 'cheap' phone, right?

If only Apple hadn't spent years pushing steel and titanium as 'better' when in reality they're just different.
 
How come Apple is still only uploading 1080p videos to YouTube? If you are advertising a 4K camera you should be uploading in 2160p, it's hard to take them seriously as a professional camera when their ads look way over compressed thanks to YouTube decimating 1080p videos.
 
Absolutely nonsense marketing pixie dust. As others have said, no one chooses to shoot anything with a budget on an iPhone unless it's supposed to look like it's shot on a cellphone. Every single one of the iPhone release music videos in the last five years would look much better if the DOP had shot on a real camera.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.