Apple Proposes Using Pogo Pins to Shrink Headphone Jacks

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Sep 23, 2010.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]

    A newly-published patent application from Apple is generating some interest today for its description of a means to reduce the size of headphone jacks by using pogo pins instead of the traditional cantilevered metal strips for mediating electrical contacts with headphone plugs.

    The invention disclosure comes as Apple continues to shrink the general overall size of its portable devices, with reducing thickness in particular being a focus for the company. As devices continue to shrink, certain physical features become limiting factors for further size reduction, as can be seen in the current iPod shuffle and iPod nano, where the thickness of the devices appears to be approaching the limits imposed by the need to accommodate the headphone jack.


    [​IMG]

    Apple's new iPod shuffle (left) and iPod nano (right)
    Apple points to the current "cantilever beam" design for headphone jack contacts as requiring significant space in two dimensions to accommodate the contacts while also requiring sufficient length to ensure the necessary leverage to maintain contact with the headphone plug.


    [​IMG]

    Cross-section of headphone jack showing pogo pin contacts
    Switching from the cantilever beam to a series of spring-loaded pogo pins lined up along the side of the headphone jack could allow the jack to essentially require space in only a single dimension, allowing for thinner device designs.
    The patent application was filed in June 2009 based on a provisional patent application filed in March of that year and is credited to Apple engineers Sean Murphy and John DiFonzo.

    Article Link: Apple Proposes Using Pogo Pins to Shrink Headphone Jacks
     
  2. Meldar macrumors regular

    Meldar

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Location:
    pocket of liberalism in farm country
    #2
    I wonder if physical stability would be an issue here - at first glance, it would appear that not much is holding that plug in place, but if it's been under patent and/or research for so long, I'm sure there's a reasonable explanation for this.

    At the same time though, I don't see why anything Apple makes needs to be thinner. The form factor of their mobile devices, for instance, is already so slim and compact that one wonders how those who use things like the multi-touch Nano can even read the screen! Plus...a headphone plug potentially bigger than the device itself...seems as though random disconnection (or worse, bending the plug or destroying the pogo pins) could be an issue.

    Always on the "cutting edge"...
     
  3. ilfn143 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Location:
    Enron by the Sea
  4. Brien macrumors 68030

    Brien

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    #4
    Not surprising. At some point, however, they are going to have to move to wireless audio/charging.
     
  5. dbowlin17 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    #5
    this could help apple slim down products, but headphone makers are not going to make headphones, making you stuck with apple earbuds. If they made smaller jacks, I would request that they also make an adapter to adapt whatever size jack they are thinking of making, so it will accept the standard 3.5mm headphones...
     
  6. miles01110 macrumors Core

    miles01110

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Location:
    The Ivory Tower (I'm not coming down)
    #6
    Forgive me for pointing out the obvious, but the screen is on the flat, "square" side of the nano and not the thin edges. Thinness has nothing to do with how large the screen is.
     
  7. ArtOfWarfare macrumors G3

    ArtOfWarfare

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    #7
    That's what I was thinking.

    Why are they still looking into ways to shrink wires?

    Really, if you insist on getting smaller, lets get rid of them all together. Stream it to my brain, if you don't mind. Or at least to my ears.
     
  8. Iphtashu Fitz macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    outside Boston
    #8
    So in effect...

    They're just taking the concept of a cylindrical lock and applying it to a headphone jack.
     
  9. reallynotnick macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2005
    #9
    I don't get how this is smaller is that not a standard 3.5mm headphone wire in the picture?

    And the problem with wireless is then you have to charge your headphones so your iPod could have 40 hours of battery life but your headphones only have 8.
     
  10. windowsblowsass macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2004
    Location:
    pa
    #10
    Sorry but my reading of this patent isnt requiring a new set of headphones, the physical space taken up inside the device would be lessened because of the pogopoins, but the headphone jack will remain 3.5 mm.
     
  11. decimortis macrumors 6502a

    decimortis

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto
    #11
    One day I hope to have an iPod I can store between the groves of my fingerprint. :cool:
     
  12. the vj macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2006
    #12
    It is stupid...

    At the same time we have several different connectors in a computer witch is stupid.

    Why USB, Firewire, DVI Firewire 800 (to name a few) have to be different? at the end all of them transmit data and power.

    I believe Apple could help humanity better by developing a single kind of cable so I can go to Radioshack and buy just one kind of cable and being able to storage just a few cables instead several different.
     
  13. iEvolution macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #13
    Yeah because the devices really need to be smaller. They are already killing features with their size obsession. The 3rd gen shuffle [no buttons] and the nano [no video/camera/games].

    Yeah thats what apple NEEDS to work on because the devices just aren't small enough, forget about adding any useful features like CAPACITY.
     
  14. barkomatic macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Location:
    Manhattan
    #14
    I really don't think any mobile Apple device needs to get thinner from its current state (except notebooks maybe). Can someone explain the benefit of a thinner iPod touch or iPhone at this point? Aside from the reaction of "cool! that is an impossibly thin phone!" I don't get it. I want to be able to pick my phone off a desk and not have to pry it with my fingernail.

    I'd rather Apple try to squeeze more features instead.
     
  15. ranReloaded macrumors 6502a

    ranReloaded

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Location:
    Tokyo
    #15
    Also, the entire assembly is made out of wood!

    [​IMG]
     
  16. Iphtashu Fitz macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    outside Boston
    #16
    It has to do with how small a form factor you can get with the jack when installing it in a component like an iPod. Pretty much all current headphone jacks rely on bent pieces of metal that act like springs to press against the contacts. That bent metal spring requires a decent amount of space. By switching from that to pins backed by springs you can shrink the overall size of the jack. This will let them manufacture jacks that are just a hairs breadth thicker than the 3.5mm headphone plug itself.
     
  17. Brinkman macrumors 6502

    Brinkman

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    #17
    Give me a tiny mag safe charger and sync over wireless N.
     
  18. swarmster macrumors 6502a

    swarmster

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    #18
    Right, the confusion is coming from the article saying this will allow for thinner devices, when really it's just allowing the headphone module to be no deeper and barely any wider than the headphone port itself, saving internal volume. The diameter of the headphone jack is still going to be a limiting factor on the thinness of the device.
     
  19. 2992 macrumors 6502

    2992

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Location:
    I'm here. Here! Can't you SEE MEE?!
    #19
    Or better: replace it with some sort of micro/mini-USB and get rid of that huge connector.
     
  20. bogg macrumors 6502

    bogg

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Location:
    Sweden
    #20
    It's smaller than the Apple Dock connector it's supposed to replace right?
     
  21. Piggie macrumors G3

    Piggie

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    #21
    It's nearly 2011 people........

    Lets get rid of wires altogether.

    40, 50, 60, 70 years ago, when people had crystal radio sets, then transistor radios, then cassette walkmans yeah a wire was ok.

    But it's almost 2011

    get rid of the wire !!!!!!
     
  22. Meldar macrumors regular

    Meldar

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Location:
    pocket of liberalism in farm country
    #22
    Yeah...I didn't phrase it too well; I meant that with increasing thinness comes decreasing proportions, meaning the screen gets smaller with the device itself. The thing could be as thick as my Classic, but with a screen that small I wouldn't go for it.

    I think they hit the mark with the iPod Classic, though. As far as thickness is concerned, it's just fine. That or the iPhone 4, depending on what primary functionality you're looking for.

    I mean, look at the MacBook Air - an underpowered machine with a severe expandibility handicap (CD drives are external, so forget walking around with the thing) and a price that makes you wonder why anyone would need it. It is shiny, though.

    Perhaps this concern of mine arises from my fear of snapping things in half?
     
  23. jlpoore89 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Location:
    Beaumont, Texas
    #23
    If you look closely inside the the headphone jack of the iPhone 4 the top the pins are already using this technology. The top one is very obvious...you can see the little ball that looks like the tip of a ballpoint pen sticking out inside the jack.
     
  24. baleensavage macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Location:
    On an island in Maine
    #24
    Patents like this really make you think about some of these older technologies that are everywhere. How long has the current headphone jack been around? In that time we've seen tape players, laserdiscs, floppy disks and many other technologies go completely obsolete and yet the headphone in it's current incarnation has largely been unchanged. Sure they have noise canceling and earbuds now, but the basic technology hasn't changed one bit. Maybe it's time for someone to come out with something better. Heck, it's a wonder the industry hasn't just moved to bluetooth headphones entirely like the cellphone headsets.
     
  25. swarmster macrumors 6502a

    swarmster

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    #25
    You never get rid of the wire, really. Wireless headphones just give you another charging wire to plug into the wall. I'd rather keep my headphones passive, thank you very much, than be unable to listen to my forever-running iPod because I forgot to plug in my earbuds last night.
     

Share This Page

126 September 23, 2010