Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

A Macbook Pro

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Aug 22, 2009
422
0
I'm so disappointed, wanted to upgrade my 2G. But now I'm seriously looking at the new nano's, they look awesome.
 
I don't think Snow Leopard was disappointing at all, if that's what you're implying.

Sure, it would have been nice to see some additions to the iPod touch. But if that doesn't work for you, go for the Nano. But don't compare it to Snow Leopard.
 
I don't think Snow Leopard was disappointing at all, if that's what you're implying.

Sure, it would have been nice to see some additions to the iPod touch. But if that doesn't work for you, go for the Nano. But don't compare it to Snow Leopard.

Don't get me wrong Snow Leopard is great and met my expectations, but they just speed enhanced the touch, nothing more. That's why I'm calling it a Snow Leopard.
 
I definitely see what you're getting at.

I find it somewhat disappointing. I get that they want to boost sales on the nano-front but honestly, i'm not buying an ipod touch now. They should have at least given the touch better battery life or something.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.