Apple pulled a Snow Leopard on the iPod Touch

Discussion in 'iPod touch' started by A Macbook Pro, Sep 9, 2009.

  1. A Macbook Pro macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    #1
    I'm so disappointed, wanted to upgrade my 2G. But now I'm seriously looking at the new nano's, they look awesome.
     
  2. ziggyonice macrumors 68020

    ziggyonice

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Location:
    Rural America
    #2
    I don't think Snow Leopard was disappointing at all, if that's what you're implying.

    Sure, it would have been nice to see some additions to the iPod touch. But if that doesn't work for you, go for the Nano. But don't compare it to Snow Leopard.
     
  3. A Macbook Pro thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    #3
    Don't get me wrong Snow Leopard is great and met my expectations, but they just speed enhanced the touch, nothing more. That's why I'm calling it a Snow Leopard.
     
  4. Rob Philips macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    #4
    I definitely see what you're getting at.

    I find it somewhat disappointing. I get that they want to boost sales on the nano-front but honestly, i'm not buying an ipod touch now. They should have at least given the touch better battery life or something.
     

Share This Page