gank41
macrumors 603
I'm not sure that would be legally possible for them to do. Just because you'd like it to be ok, doesn't mean someone else might complain that the Phone isn't working.Allow and enable people to keep using it WiFi only.
I'm not sure that would be legally possible for them to do. Just because you'd like it to be ok, doesn't mean someone else might complain that the Phone isn't working.Allow and enable people to keep using it WiFi only.
I've got a bunch of old equipment, too. What's wrong with holding on to old phones and stuff??you have an m4 air... so why would you own anything else aside from as a museum piece? I sell and upgrade all my old stuff on a regular basis in the most profitable way I can. I mean the $499 Mac mini we had access to up until recently buries most Macs of the past.
I'm not sure that would be legally possible for them to do. Just because you'd like it to be ok, doesn't mean someone else might complain that the Phone isn't working.
Well, even Mac hardware is getting to be this way with trusted computing and the TPM-turned-T2-turned-integrated-into-Apple-Silicon chip. If I think about it too long, Windows and Linux start beckoning me again.Another reminder that you never really own an iPhone (or any iOS based device).
Apple's current charm-offensive is giving many long-time users a lot of new reasons to reconsider other solutions, isn’t it?Well, even Mac hardware is getting to be this way with trusted computing and the TPM-turned-T2-turned-integrated-into-Apple-Silicon chip. If I think about it too long, Windows and Linux start beckoning me again.
Maybe for you, but legally not for Apple. They'd be issuing a Software Update for a Phone. People will still complain that their Phone doesn't work.You just said the context is that the device no longer has cellular support.
In any case ... an "optional" update solves the issue.
For these devices, the features that still function and have server-side support work much like they did when new, aside from some app and OS bloat or throttling introduced in the last supported updates for the devices. Being in 2026 doesn’t inherently slow them down, except that websites now tend to have massive amounts of JavaScript tracking scripts and larger default image sizes. The camera still takes photos, iBooks still renders ePubs and PDFs, and the notes app still works. Many older apps continue to run as if time forgot them, especially a lot of pre-IAP games. Just don’t expect 3G or Edge to work, and GSM calling may be impossible on phones with now-unsupported frequencies.of course but I can't see the logic in running any of these devices in 2026. they'd run slow as molasses even with replaced parts and they'd also be a security hazard I'd think. the iPhone 7 was the first iPhone I ever used that never felt sluggish to me by the time I upgraded and I've had them since the launch.
I am still using my iPad 4 that I bought in late 2012 — yeap, nearly 14 years ago — for ebooks, movies, music, iMessaging, emailing... it is far, far, FAR from being a useless device.These devices became useless due to software updates long ago this is just the final nail from Apple. Aka go buy another one
Macs at least can (theoretically) boot another OS like Linux. But you're right. Restoring Apple Silicon Macs with a fresh copy of macOS might also not be possible down the road.Well, even Mac hardware is getting to be this way with trusted computing and the TPM-turned-T2-turned-integrated-into-Apple-Silicon chip. If I think about it too long, Windows and Linux start beckoning me again.
It’s your device. Apple didn’t take it away from you. It won’t stop functioning. Are you suggesting there is no competition in the cell phone market? Exercise your agency.Folks this is why we need competition, this is why we need regulation and this is why we need to "control" devices we pay our money for.
Who is they?If we give them an inch they will take a mile.
How many times has this happened in the past? Do you think there may be some special situation, instead of creating some strawman about a future restore, maybe discuss why this occurred.What's stopping them from 4-5 years down the line saying you can't restore your iPhone 17,
Does the device suddenly stop working?when you were planning on giving it to a parent or your child?
Strawman.What's stopping them from preventing you from selling your device that's fully paid off?
Stand up to what practices?I'm not anti-business, but we as consumers need to stand up to these sorts of practices.
Who said you are losing access?We don't work our butts off to be treated like garbage and lose access to our own products.
Look at how long the competition supports their devices.Folks this is why we need competition, this is why we need regulation and this is why we need to "control" devices we pay our money for. If we give them an inch they will take a mile. What's stopping them from 4-5 years down the line saying you can't restore your iPhone 17, when you were planning on giving it to a parent or your child? What's stopping them from preventing you from selling your device that's fully paid off? I'm not anti-business, but we as consumers need to stand up to these sorts of practices. We don't work our butts off to be treated like garbage and lose access to our own products.
nothing wrong with it. it's just pointless. hell I just got a MacBook Air for the first time and realize I have no need for my iPad Pro anymore so prob gonna sell that.I've got a bunch of old equipment, too. What's wrong with holding on to old phones and stuff??
The security hazard is smoke and mirrors; almost any OS could be patched to address security flaws.
But how do you define "slow"? I mean, I write on a Mac SE. Granted, it runs System 6.0.8 (without Multifinder) and has a BlueSCSI with an 8GB SSD in it, an accelerator card, and a full(!) 4MB of RAM. Further, I use Write Now as my word processor (it was written in 68k assembly code, so its RAM footprint is small, and RTF works just fine to get documents back from it).
My SE is faster than it was stock, but it's not "fast" compared to my M4 MBA… but do I need it to be? Nope. Do you really need your phone to be "fast"? It's a phone. Calls, email, and texting don't need to be "fast."
Maybe we've let these corporations convince us we require things that we really don't.
you have an m4 air... so why would you own anything else aside from as a museum piece? I sell and upgrade all my old stuff on a regular basis in the most profitable way I can. I mean the $499 Mac mini we had access to up until recently buries most Macs of the past.
Microsoft Word 5.1a on my re-chipped, re-capped SE/30 is my favorite distraction-free writing setup. It may lack the speed of modern hardware, but it more than makes up for it with character.
it's just pointless...
I debated an SE/30 but settled on the SE because 4MB of RAM meant I couldn't run System 7 comfortably (and I could remove the distractions). I still installed Tetris, though. 😉
Spectrum HoloByte Tetris is the only version I consider truly authentic. Everything else feels like a poor imitation or blatant rip-off. I chose the SE/30 because I see it as the pinnacle Mac of its era, and classic Macs unfortunately never improved after that. Same for the iMac Pro.
Completely agree. If I had room for an SE/30, I'd set one up, but the SE does precisely what I need. I do like the Color Classic (would love to have one of those with the Mystic upgrade), but the SE/30 would be my ideal compact black and white Mac.
And, of course, Spectrum HoloByte. Is there any other?
So did cars.That 5c was a nice looking phone. I know phone designs have changed a lot but dang phones used to look so much nicer on the older models compared to these lifeless looking blocks we have now.