Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Of course as soon as iGlass/iSpecs/iAug launches to great acclaim the fandoirds will chant "google was first with google glass and cardboard! Apple just copied, they don't innovate!"
 
Such a personal style choice. It will be hard to find what, maybe 3 different designs that will satisfy everyone.

Personally the only style of (Sun)glasses I wear or would wear, gotta be square frames and thick arms like -

6019Superdark_GG_Sunglasses_Black_90_LG_002.jpg

Make those in space grey or black with clear lenses and I’m sold.

However the previous MCK rumor noted P3 style like -

058_large.jpg

No way.
You have a point. I would never wear the sunglasses you show while I use the black P3 style glasses every day.
 
"Apple confirmed the purchase to Reuters with the statement that it uses when it makes an acquisition: 'Apple buys smaller companies from time to time, and we generally don't discuss our purpose or plans.'"

Since Apple is the worlds largest company, isn't every company a "smaller company" compared to it? That statement says absolutely nothing
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedTomato
I wonder how they will coax people into buying AR glasses if you already need glasses - which need changing all the time as your eyes degrade! This would get very expensive, very quickly for a normal person in the street.
 
AR -- the quadraphonics of the 21st Century. The technology will be adopted by a tiny group of true believers, cause endless industry and consumer debates resulting in multiple "standards", and in the end it will be forgotten.
Probably not a good analogy since unlike quadraphonics, no extra equipment other than the phone you already own is required and the numbers are not small. ARKit is on over 380 million iOS devices alone, not even counting what Google is/will bring to the arena. And you build an app/service that works on iOS, Android, Windows 10. No pesky 'standards' to get in way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: myscrnnm
Hololens viewport is laughably tiny. Leap ain’t much better. It’s going to be years still. Oh and Google Glass? Haaaaaaaa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bensisko
Hololens viewport is laughably tiny. Leap ain’t much better. It’s going to be years still. Oh and Google Glass? Haaaaaaaa.

I think we are DECADES away, especially for mass adoption. Same thing with driverless cars, they will come out, but the majority of countries/cities/streets won’t be “compatible enough” to operate such cars.

I think in both case scenarios we are away 30-50 years into the future and maybe more...
 
AR glasses are never going to be something that you can wear all the time. It's impossible. They will always be a niche product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RogerWilco
AR glasses are never going to be something that you can wear all the time. It's impossible. They will always be a niche product.
What about the people who have to wear glasses all the time? And what if the AR module sits in the frame, projecting infos on the glass like a hologram? So many unclarities for now, but I think Apple gets it right.
 
Zero innovation. We have the money. Hell lets just buy it instead. The signature of modern Apple. Sad.

Yeah, because all the other guys build everything in-house, from scratch.

Your comment is hilarious, as the best mobile processors on the market are made by Apple and it all started with a series of acquisitions. This is just an example of course, it's the normal modus operandi of most of the tech sector.
 
What about the people who have to wear glasses all the time? And what if the AR module sits in the frame, projecting infos on the glass like a hologram? So many unclarities for now, but I think Apple gets it right.

Well, I already wear glasses, so AR glasses is just going to represent extra utility at no extra cost to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emil and Stella
We will see what happens with this purchase. :)

Oh yeah!

WatchOS to replace iOS, and interface with this ‘proposed ros’. The key here is he company is the first (sorry sony beat them to this) to have transparent lens HUD.

This is going to get really cool like in the Netflix movie !! ARkit is going to be powerful.
 
McFly. Apple much? Smart and timely acquisitions are the name of the game. Heck, many startups position themselves for exactly that path. It’s not sad, it’s happy.

I'm sure you'd be sad to know the original iPod had an underlining system made by PortalPlayer, or that Apple acquired multi-touch technology from FingerWorks as the basis for iPhones and iPads. Acquiring a smaller company for its technology is a smart decision and a win-win scenario. The acquirer gets fast-tracked product development while people who developed said technology gets a nice financial package for their hard work.
 
What about the people who have to wear glasses all the time? And what if the AR module sits in the frame, projecting infos on the glass like a hologram? So many unclarities for now, but I think Apple gets it right.

It'll be even harder for those of us who wear glasses. If I have a pair of AR glasses, I'd have to remove them if I go to the gym, to the swimming pool, the cinema, theatre, I couldn't go into the office with them, or any government building to name but a few. None of these places will let me in with a live camera strapped to my head.

It would be easy enough for people who don't wear glasses to take them off, but those of us who do would need to carry around a non-AR pair of glasses and constantly have to change them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RogerWilco
Imagine watching a sport that doesn't require AR and overlays to make it interesting.

Imagine watching sports
(said geek like me)
No, cannot even imagine that happening :)

In my AR glasses I will always see dragons flying around, and I will be always surrounded by a beautiful nature, full of mystical creatures. All of that until somebody runs me over by car
 
Zero innovation. We have the money. Hell lets just buy it instead. The signature of modern Apple. Sad.

I guess the innovation is what they might do to the technology that does not have to be recreated. Say your iPhone now, it's not a new innovation. Really, it's a PDA (which existed) and a phone (which existed) that were put together in one device ... some may call that innovation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.