Yep, well the one arriving on Nov 2nd is going back until I know more about the Vega option and its potential impact.Just wait for some 3rd party real world benchmarks.
Yep, well the one arriving on Nov 2nd is going back until I know more about the Vega option and its potential impact.Just wait for some 3rd party real world benchmarks.
Yeah, but they need to keep their customers happy and offer some 90 day returns and other exceptions to people who bought a top of the line machine just 2 months ago and would have gladly jumped at the chance to have a higher end GPU.
Releasing them a new option after only 3 months just pisses people off.
That, they hold for 3 months
I didn't even know they had anything below the 56, especially considering Apple says on their website "Featuring the same graphics architecture used in iMac Pro." But that makes a lot more sense that it's a lower end Vega 16 and 20.
What I think people are frustrated by is just that though, are they going to still offer the 560X, or is this relating their 560X.
Any chance the upgraded graphics will be offered on the 13” Pro?
There's no advantage to anyone in delaying updates for nine months just to fit an artificial release cycle. You buy the best machine you can afford when you need one and leave it at that. There'll always be better models around the corner no matter when you buy.updating once a year seems to be a sweet spot. like they already do with the iPhone.
So again, what should they do? Not release it for 6 months - but then people who bought it after 4 months will complain it got an unexpected extra option to upgrade 2 months after they bought it.
At some point you have to accept that there's always something else around the corner with technology - and either stop complaining it's updated too often or stop complaining it's not updated often enough.
[doublepost=1540981921][/doublepost]
Very foolish sentence, you actually believe they've just sat on this for 3 months. Ridiculous.
AMD have only just finished the mobile Vega line - no one else has it either, in fact it's not even ready to ship yet never mind "sitting on it for three months" no other manufacturer released it either.
The only thing they could have done is delay the release of the MacBook Pro for 4 months until AMD had the chips ready - but they probably didn't give them an exact time frame so that's not a viable option.
[doublepost=1540982053][/doublepost]
It is the same architecture the "Vega" line - but it's a mobile variation. They didn't have anything less than the "56" before this is a new line that AMD are just releasing, no one has it any computers yet and it's not ready for another month.
They are NOT replacing any of the Radeon options, it's a further tier upgrade for people who want it.
Saying that it's good that Apple are consistently slow in improving all their products is not a strong argument. It certainly isn't one that Steve Jobs would have given house room to.Apple has justifiably sat on countless technological improvements, over all their product lines— all in the name of product consistency.
[doublepost=1540981921][/doublepost]
Very foolish sentence, you actually believe they've just sat on this for 3 months. Ridiculous.
AMD have only just finished the mobile Vega line - no one else has it either, in fact it's not even ready to ship yet never mind "sitting on it for three months" no other manufacturer released it either.
The only thing they could have done is delay the release of the MacBook Pro for 4 months until AMD had the chips ready - but they probably didn't give them an exact time frame so that's not a viable option.
[doublepost=1540982053][/doublepost]
There's no advantage to anyone in delaying updates for nine months just to fit an artificial release cycle. You buy the best machine you can afford when you need one and leave it at that. There'll always be better models around the corner no matter when you buy.
I think there is absolutely zero chance, given no 13" Macbook ever had a dedicated GPU.
and honestly, all those "this is it! i'm done with apple" comments are amusing. I think its quite simple: You buy the hardware you need/want for a price that you are willing to pay. If you think: Yeah, the Radeon 560X does fit my needs and im willing to pay the price and i need new hardware now, just buy it and be happy with it (and imho, the Radeon Pro 560X has more than enough power for most MOBILE "pro" use cases; build a cheap gaming rig if you want more power for gaming. I have the impression a lot of people buy the best/newest hardware only because they want it, not because they need it.). If you think: Oh, thats not powerful enough for me ... don't buy it . There are tons of other alternatives on the market (be it an iMac, an eGPU or cheaper Windows Hardware). Apple does not owe you anything.
tell that to a friend of mine that works at a fast food joint saving up for months to get this to start her youtube channel. she's absolutely floored by this and she's slightly blaming me for telling her that MacBook Pros won't be updated for a while.
And they could have said so, so people can decide how to invest their money better, i.e. buy back then or wait, based on their needs. These things are not decided last minute so yes, I believe this was planed and the information was deliberately hold so it does not affect sales. If you think that is ridiculous... ok...
Apple has justifiably sat on countless technological improvements, over all their product lines— all in the name of product consistency. All tech brands must balance this. It doesn’t matter *what* AMD suddenly comes up with in its skunkworks lab, every innovation must fit into a larger product mold.
This is something Apple has done much better than PC makers, who release a new model at the drop of a hat—which dilutes their brand’s value and eats away at things like perceived worth. Apple is bigger than its spec sheet. This is why people regularly buy Apple products that are technically out of date. They know Apple will still take care of them and not render their hardware obsolete. This concept exists opposite of the spec-obsessed “give-it-to-me-now!!!” PC crowd.
tell her, her macbook pro from 2018 will be just fine for starting a youtube channel. it is a really nice (and expensive) piece of hardware perfectly fine for this job and most probably won't limit her in any way for years to come (besides hardware failures
). blaming you seems like an unfair move from her, nobody could have guessed a vega option will be coming in november.
Nice! Now time for Apple to end their feud with NVIDIA.
The model I’m waiting for is a 13 inch MacBook Pro fortunately this article says nothing about which models will be getting Tomorrow I’m waiting for is the 13 inch MacBook Pro fortunately this article says nothing about which models and getting this update.This is the laptop I've been waiting for!
No it wasn't. AMD literally announced these GPU's a few days ago. On top of that, I really don't give a **** about your jealousy. I didn't get that laptop because it didn't offer the GPU I wanted. Simple as that. Now there's a laptop that will, and I don't think it's reasonable that I shouldn't be able to get that laptop because you're upset you bought a laptop you didn't really want after all and now you're jealous of those who get the better one. Good things come to those who wait and know what they want, I believe is the expression?It depends if this is an upgrade option on-top of the 560x or if this is in replacement for the same price. It isn't that they updated it, but the Vega 56 is years old, and they definitely had this technology a few months ago when they refreshed the MBPs. To update the MBP just a few months ago, and then update it again a few months later and get more bang for your buck is what's upsetting.
Again, if this is a MORE expensive option over what currently exists, that's fine... I wouldn't spend more money than I did on this MBP, but if it's the same price, few months later, with a 60% graphics improvement... that's just wrong man. They should wait at least 6 months... I can't remember them ever releasing 2 hardware updates in a single year, let alone one with a 60% speed bump so close to one another.
The is nothing in the new specs that will affect the machine you have in any way....we fools pay ridiculous prices for not-so-high performance and quite a lot of issues, so they can now release a new option that basically outdates the machines we have...
That’s why Apple has an iGPU. MBP batteries always stunk when using dGPUEveryone returns their MBP's, a month passes and we see how fast the battery drains using Vega graphics.. and all the babies start crying again.
I just contacted sales customer service supervisor level and....... they approved a 1 time 90 day return exception.SOOO HAPPY
Apple has the best customer service. bar none.