Well then we disagree on the meaning of the term „digital zoom“. There is nothing „digital“ about cropping.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 17 Pro Apple really should have upgraded the main camera for the 17 Pro
- Thread starter bryanrs
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well then we disagree on the meaning of the term „digital zoom“. There is nothing „digital“ about cropping.
If the optics don’t change, it’s digital zoom.
by definition, if you’re zooming without changing the optics, it’s digital zoom.
The iPhone 17 Pro’s 8× is just a center crop of the 48MP telephoto , no interpolation, so still digital.
Folks, I'm just talking about physical hardware here. Of course Apple has made many changes to their processing pipeline and software since the 14 Pro. There is 1 physical upgrade that is very real: they started using an improved anti reflective coating on the lens of the 16 Pro, so that is a nice physical upgrade for sure but other than that it's physically the same as the 14 Pro main camera https://fstoppers.com/landscapes/apples-secret-upgrade-iphone-16-pro-yields-incredible-results-682936#:~:text=I won't dwell too much on these tests because I don't think the main sensor or its technology has changed much (if at all) since the iPhone 14 Pro
To be fair, PetaPixel says the faster readout speed does give the 16 Pro one benefit: slightly sharper/clearer photos for moving objects (or if camera is the one moving)
But what I'm talking about here is for more serious photography using ProRes, ProRAW or Halide Process Zero where computational processing isn't there to help, there is no meaningful improvements compared to the 14 Pro.
petapixel.com
Bottom line, that main camera is over due for a significant upgrade (remember, this is a "Pro" iPhone we're talking about folks). I'm really hoping they go with a bigger sensor that uses Sony's new 2 layer transistor pixel tech.
To be fair, PetaPixel says the faster readout speed does give the 16 Pro one benefit: slightly sharper/clearer photos for moving objects (or if camera is the one moving)
But what I'm talking about here is for more serious photography using ProRes, ProRAW or Halide Process Zero where computational processing isn't there to help, there is no meaningful improvements compared to the 14 Pro.
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro / Pro Max Review for Photographers
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro favors hardware upgrades over AI imagery. The new camera controls are welcome but is the image quality any better?
Bottom line, that main camera is over due for a significant upgrade (remember, this is a "Pro" iPhone we're talking about folks). I'm really hoping they go with a bigger sensor that uses Sony's new 2 layer transistor pixel tech.
Last edited:
They don’t have to and take the ready when it’s ready approach. They know it’s still going to sell gangbusters regardless without it.
Do you have an analysis on the new tetraprism? If not, how do you know there isn’t an 8x light path in there?