Can you post a pic?Yea, Apple sold a number of watches back then, as well as an Apple wall clock. I recently found my old wall clock, I may still have an old Apple Watch variant somewhere.
Can you post a pic?Yea, Apple sold a number of watches back then, as well as an Apple wall clock. I recently found my old wall clock, I may still have an old Apple Watch variant somewhere.
Printers - there are too many good 3rd Party alternatives today that work seamlessly with Mac (unless Apple come up with some radical new printer technology). Plus, they're mostly sold on the Gillette Razor Blade model - "give away" the printers and charge a fortune for the ink/toner - so they'd be hard to compete with. Back in the day, 3rd party printer support for Mac was patchy and the Mac didn't even have the parallel printer port that most PCs used. Even then, the Stylewriter used a Canon mechanism. The Laserwriter was pretty much the first mass-market laser printer but it's real secret sauce was cheap, plug-and-play Localtalk networking so you could easily share one expensive laserwriter between a whole workgroup of Macs without hiring a rocket scientist. Nowadays, all but the cheapest printers have WiFi.Very interesting products. Will be nice if there is a new printer from Apple today or even a new camera!!
I think the only real failure shown in this article is the Pippin. Most of the rest were moderately successful for a while and might have been kept on by Jobs if the whole company hadn't been circling the drain at the time.When you look at the history of Apple they have had some quirky devices and a few failures throughout their history.
Some of these oddities maybe help with later projects and others are just dead ends.
I had the StyleWriter II. It was a great printer. By far the most reliable inkjet I ever had before I gave up and moved on to laser printers. As I recall, the StyleWriter had a Canon Bubblejet engine under the hood.In my memory the StyleWriter was far better than the other options at the time, certainly better than the dot-matrix's that we had. Were they actually good?
Other than the Pippin, nothing is odd or failed about the above products. The QuickTake was a great, pioneering product, and my StyleWriter II served me fine for many years. The Studio Display was also wonderful in a period when everything was still CRT.I used a Studio Display at work in 2002, and it was cutting edge cool back then.
Can’t you also add a vga/dvi to this or an older vga/adc? I don’t remember. Too long ago.it's too bad the DVI/ADC adapters dont work for these guys, they were truly excellent displays
Can we talk about the 2000 Studio Display CRT which to this day is the sexist piece of hardware I've ever seen
![]()
Loved my Power Computing clone from that era.
I think the first Airport Base Station falls into this category…
it's too bad the DVI/ADC adapters dont work for these guys, they were truly excellent displays
They were beautiful but all seemed to crack right in the middle of the base.Can we talk about the 2000 Studio Display CRT which to this day is the sexist piece of hardware I've ever seen
![]()
Here you go:Can you post a pic?
Braun as well. Ironic given how influential Dieter Rams was on Ive.Here you go: View attachment 2528498
I had the Color Stylewriter 2400, was pretty slow and the ink cartridges were $$$$$. They are just a rebranded Canon bubblejet, with a serial interface. Much more quieter than the dot-matrix's.In my memory the StyleWriter was far better than the other options at the time, certainly better than the dot-matrix's that we had. Were they actually good?
It actually had metal components in them, compared to mostly plastic these days.The Style Writer was a great printer. I used it in university and it was far more reliable than modern printers.
They should have listened to Big Daddy Kane.Apple found out the hard way that Pippin ain't easy.
To put a positive spin on it I imagine there is a lot of stuff that does not move from internal R&D and focus groups into the public eye.😀👍Id like to see Apple try more stuff, like the VR goggles and similar. But Apple is doing too little innovation and experimentation at this point.