I jus updated to Monterrey for the first time and it works better than Big Sur. I update to whole new OS version everytime it gets to X.6 So it was to move to Monterrey. It is the best way to always use a stable Mac.
I do love your scheme, I might steal that one.
I bought an M1P MBP just recently, and the two big reasons I held out this long were: to give it time for any horrible hardware faults to surface; to give it time for the newly released Monterey that comes installed with it (and can't be downgraded to older macOS versions) to iron out the bugs. Mine came with 12.4, which I am relieved to say has been fine.
One thing though, you're quite brave updating to x.6 the
very day it is released. I usually give it a few days at least, to make sure there aren't any tragic bugs that got released with the bug fixes. You know, Apple's wonderful software quality control and all.
There's an age old question, what would you do if you didn't have to worry about money. It has always had me partially stumped. However, I do know what I would do if I was so rich as to be a billionaire. I would start my own computer/phone company. Basically take all the best things I love about Macs, iPhones, and macOS (I can't even bring myself to say iOS, it's so infuriating how hamstrung and limited it is), and then add in all the great things they've left out (or even removed!!!!), and kick out all the infuriatingly horrid things they've put in. It would be a hell of a lot more flexible with getting around the locked down elements (but still be capable of being locked down if users want or need), and would be a hell of a lot less focused on maximising profits. And definitely wouldn't be putting profits first at the expense of capabilities. It would also have a ton more quality control around the software. That would be my project if I was a billionaire's kid. Ah, just thinking about the machines I would build puts a smile on my face.