Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hopefully this is the beginning of Apple's relationship with SLJ. I would pay REAL money to have Siri talk in his voice.

And the Maps directions!

"OK, turn right in 200 feet. HELLO, turn right right the F--- now! Aw, s--- you missed it; make a u-turn you dumb@ss..."
 
looks good. will watch for sure. have been pleasantly impressed with the apple tv+ content so far.
- see, like!
- morning show, like!
- for all mankind, like!, reminds me of man in high tower, but faster paced
- dickinson, meh...think i'm out of demographic for this
- elephant queen, gorgeous, like!
- kids stuff, didn't watch, out of demo.
[automerge]1572905261[/automerge]
What's with Apple's obsession with celebrities?
because it works. what do you think the rest of the world does too?
[automerge]1572905424[/automerge]
I am told that Hollywood financial accounting is … weird. It truly depends on the production costs, plus the royalties. A google search puts Samuel L. Jackson at about $6,200,000 per movie, or 1,550,000 paid subscriptions to pay just for his salary. Jennifer Aniston is at $1,100,000 per episode, or 275,000 paid subscriptions per episode. Add other names such as Reese Whiterspoon or Jason Momoa and the price goes up quite substantially.
This is even before actual production costs (pre-production, director, tech services, post production, CGI etc. and, again, royalties. PLUS the actual service's costs such as servers, programmers, lawyers etc).
I am starting to think that ATV+ is just to sell more devices as a "free" service included with the purchase.
i noticed they integrated it into apple TV instead of making it standalone. so part of their strategy seems to be to drive and increase usage in apple TV app and sell more movies, subscriptions, and apple tv devices. if traffic can get high enough, they can charge more for placement rights for the premium channels for their placement in it also. point is they are looking at network effect to cover the costs on top of just the subscription fee's is my assumption.
 
This looks decent but Apple is going to need a lot more good original content that keeps users hooked to keep up with services like Disney+, Prime Video, and Netflix in order to get a good market share in this highly competitive space.
that's why it's basically free for the first year for everyone that buys any device and week free for others. personally i have tv+, netflix, disney+ and prime video. i might cancel my netflix if disney+ original content is reallly good. netflix hasn't had much content i like in months....plus they give you a month free after you quit to try and get you back lol.
 
Looking forward to this. I always enjoy Samuel Jackson no matter what movie he's in.

I actually didn't realise that Apple would be bringing feature length movies to the party, so this is a pleasant surprise. I'm really enjoying Apple TV+ at the moment and see no likelihood of cancelling any time soon.
Check out The Elephant Queen. It, Hala and The Banker are all being released first to theater so they are eligible for the Oscars.
 
What a suprise! Another drama movie from Apple! Apple TV+ - the best medicine if you suffer insomnia.

I'm guessing you've spent all of 3 1/2 minutes watching any show, if that.
[automerge]1572914225[/automerge]
I am told that Hollywood financial accounting is … weird. It truly depends on the production costs, plus the royalties. A google search puts Samuel L. Jackson at about $6,200,000 per movie, or 1,550,000 paid subscriptions to pay just for his salary. Jennifer Aniston is at $1,100,000 per episode, or 275,000 paid subscriptions per episode. Add other names such as Reese Whiterspoon or Jason Momoa and the price goes up quite substantially.
This is even before actual production costs (pre-production, director, tech services, post production, CGI etc. and, again, royalties. PLUS the actual service's costs such as servers, programmers, lawyers etc).
I am starting to think that ATV+ is just to sell more devices as a "free" service included with the purchase.

There are nearly 1.7 billion Apple devices on the planet. Apple doesn't need a very large percentage of those to turn a profit on Apple TV+, and it makes zero difference whether the money comes from hardware sales or subscription fees. The money is still green.
 
looks good. will watch for sure. have been pleasantly impressed with the apple tv+ content so far.
- see, like!
- morning show, like!
- for all mankind, like!, reminds me of man in high tower, but faster paced
- dickinson, meh...think i'm out of demographic for this
- elephant queen, gorgeous, like!
- kids stuff, didn't watch, out of demo.
[automerge]1572905261[/automerge]

because it works. what do you think the rest of the world does too?
[automerge]1572905424[/automerge]

i noticed they integrated it into apple TV instead of making it standalone. so part of their strategy seems to be to drive and increase usage in apple TV app and sell more movies, subscriptions, and apple tv devices. if traffic can get high enough, they can charge more for placement rights for the premium channels for their placement in it also. point is they are looking at network effect to cover the costs on top of just the subscription fee's is my assumption.

Long time ago, Apple used to stand out from “the rest of the world”, being the rebel and the dreamer that doesn’t follow the norms of the mainstream and established culture and tech ideas.

And you’re actually favoring more of what Apple stands for today? Over glorifying soulless celebrities and producing fashion statement products.

Such a shame.
 
anyone notice the Apple+ logo at the end of the trailer? Just a still logo oddly placed on the left. I know I’ve seen an animated version, why not use that? It just looks kind of amateur to be honest...
 
Long time ago, Apple used to stand out from “the rest of the world”, being the rebel and the dreamer that doesn’t follow the norms of the mainstream and established culture and tech ideas.

And you’re actually favoring more of what Apple stands for today? Over glorifying soulless celebrities and producing fashion statement products.

Such a shame.
Really tired of hearing “this isn’t my Apple anymore” crap.

So just when did Apple sell out? Help me nail it down.

When they sold their first iPod in 2001 or their 400+ millionth this year?

When they sold their first iPhone in 2007 or their 1.5 billionth earlier this year?

Maybe it was dumping moto and hitching their wagon to Intel’s Evil Death Star in 2005

Of course it could have been 2007 when they dropped “Computer” from their name.

Maybe it was buying Beats in 2014?

Maybe it all ended in 2015 with the butterfly keyboard?

The gold Watch in 2015? Was that it?

2019 with the launch of Apple News+, Apple Card, Arcade and/or ATV+ ? Was that it? Did it just happen?

Or maybe it was all over when Jobs died in 2011?

I’m really curious to know when you think the death of your tech counter-culture icon occurred.
 
This looks decent but Apple is going to need a lot more good original content that keeps users hooked to keep up with services like Disney+, Prime Video, and Netflix in order to get a good market share in this highly competitive space.

Apple also needs to license some good third party content that can give the service some more value, similar to Netflix/Hulu/Prime.
 
Apple also needs to license some good third party content that can give the service some more value, similar to Netflix/Hulu/Prime.
Apple appears to have no interest in licensing third party content. Their thinking seems to be, why rent when you can afford to buy? They are also reportedly buying out the residuals.

It’s $5/month. Apple’s got another 40 or more shows in various stages of production. If a customer doesn’t find the value of a single iTunes movie in a month of Apple TV+, they’ll either not subscribe, or cancel. No big deal.
 
Really tired of hearing “this isn’t my Apple anymore” crap.

So just when did Apple sell out? Help me nail it down.

When they sold their first iPod in 2001 or their 400+ millionth this year?

When they sold their first iPhone in 2007 or their 1.5 billionth earlier this year?

Maybe it was dumping moto and hitching their wagon to Intel’s Evil Death Star in 2005

Of course it could have been 2007 when they dropped “Computer” from their name.

Maybe it was buying Beats in 2014?

Maybe it all ended in 2015 with the butterfly keyboard?

The gold Watch in 2015? Was that it?

2019 with the launch of Apple News+, Apple Card, Arcade and/or ATV+ ? Was that it? Did it just happen?

Or maybe it was all over when Jobs died in 2011?

I’m really curious to know when you think the death of your tech counter-culture icon occurred.
Death by a thousand cuts. But your last one is most people’s favourites as the big one for reasons that are obvious. It wasn’t just the fact Jobs died, it was that he chose a soulless hypocritical supply chain beancounter as his successor.
[automerge]1572942034[/automerge]
As for this offering, it seems like another case of “let’s throw a couple of well known/liked Hollywood actors at a boringly predictable loosely based on history virtue-signalling script” and hope for the best. This looks like what was euphemistically called in the olden days - a “tv movie” (the irony) or the sort of filler you’ll see littered about inflight entertainment these days.
 
Last edited:
Death by a thousand cuts. But your last one is most people’s favourites as the big one for reasons that are obvious. It wasn’t just the fact Jobs died, it was that he chose a soulless hypocritical supply chain beancounter as his successor.
[automerge]1572942034[/automerge]
As for this offering, it seems like another case of “let’s throw a couple of well known/liked Hollywood actors at a boringly predictable loosely based on history virtue-signalling script” and hope for the best. This looks like what was euphemistically called in the olden days - a “tv movie” (the irony) or the sort of filler you’ll see littered about inflight entertainment these days.
Yes, Cook is an empathetic, caring leader that is leading Apple in many good works to make the world a better place. Virtuous people can certainly show up others for the many virtues they themselves lack, and obviously this can be quite upsetting.

Neither Apple or Cook is perfect, but I’d give them maybe a 95/100. Some equate falling short with hypocrisy; feel free if it pleases you. I agree that Apple/Cook could do even more good works and earn a 100/100!

We can hope for perfection, while acknowledging there’s still work for them to do. But for those 95 good things—and despite the 5 that I disagree with—thanks Tim Apple!! You are truly the role model to which parents can have their children aspire :)
 
This looks good.
Yes! It looks awesome to me. I especially like Nick Hoult — but the cast is great and it looks like a ton of fun.

I say best of luck to Apple. Traditional media players can use the disruption and competition. I’ll either buy it or I won’t, like everything out there, but there’s better reasons to hope that they succeed than that they fail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mayo86
Because it’s all about you… lots of people have watched and enjoyed every one of the shows Apple put up at the weekend. To be honest I think they have a pretty good product on their hands, and the signs are that they’ve got lots of great stuff in the wings.

But for some people they’ll never be happy because they genuinely get their kicks complaining about Apple. Which, I suppose, is great for them, because they can do that for free!
[automerge]1572885736[/automerge]


For All Mankind IS sci-fi.

Calm down ...there's no need to get so triggered over my post ;) Apple TV+ will fail, and when it does, I will gladly come back into the archives in order to send you a big "I told you so".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd watch it because Anthony Mackie is the man!

oh ... we be ready to walk through doors SIDEWAYS!

PS: I honestly thought that last Broken Mirror TV episode may have hurt his career. I'm SUPER happy I'm mistaken. He's taken on a LOT of new roles, different characters etc. broadening his horizons.
[automerge]1573005828[/automerge]
What's with Apple's obsession with celebrities?

LMAO .... what is the WORLDS obsession?!
 
Long time ago, Apple used to stand out from “the rest of the world”, being the rebel and the dreamer that doesn’t follow the norms of the mainstream and established culture and tech ideas.

And you’re actually favoring more of what Apple stands for today? Over glorifying soulless celebrities and producing fashion statement products.

Such a shame.
i'm hoping they can find some new product visionary leaders as well. i think jony ivy leaving may open up space for that . we'lll see! steve jobs quality leaders don't grow on tree's.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.