I love how these "professionals" are calling it a virus![]()
This was my first thought. PC users will be all over this until they realize it was falsely reported as a virus, again.
I love how these "professionals" are calling it a virus![]()
including a splashed headline on the Drudge Report.
Hey if it's broken fix it.![]()
I went back to the main page after reading the article about 600K Macs being infected. Wow, Apple's upped their game here against this kind of thing.![]()
Hi. Can you guys tell me whether you think my Macbook got infected? Yesterday I did a search for "msnbc live feed online." Two of the results were websites called zahipedia.info.com and the other epctv.com. I can't remember which of the two it was (I think the latter), but, when I went to it, a small window popped up telling me that I should clean my computer of junk. I clicked OK to get rid of the window, then Safari froze up. I couldn't even quit it until I forced quit it via Finder. Could this have infected my computer? My Macbook is fairly new and, as far as I know, free of junk. Is epctv a dangerous site? Why did it tell me I had junk? How would I find out if I got infected? Thanks.
Who cares...
----------
I'm an educated person, and I'll turn gatekeeper ON.
I would say that gatekeeper ON is a wise choice for M O S T folks, and most folks who own apple gear are highly educated.
By the way, laws of computing 101: The OK button agrees to something, the Cancel/close window button disagrees. If you click OK, know what you're saying OK to.
EDIT: In other words, stop using it to close windows.
Most Windows users could careless what happens to Apple computers unless an Apple user has been bragging/taunting a Windows user that their computer is impenetrable to viruses and trojans.This was my first thought. PC users will be all over this until they realize it was falsely reported as a virus, again.
...most folks who own apple gear are highly educated.
trojan releases, Apple protects against it about 4 hours later. On Windows I would have to use a 3rd party software and it would have a 50% chance of being fixed within 2 weeks.
Just another reason why I am so thankful I converted to mac 7 years ago![]()
Yes, SL is vulnerable even more than typical OS X Lion users, because SL had Java preinstalled. Apple removed it in OS X Lion like they did with Flash a year or so ago so users have to go to Adobe's site to get the latest version. Are you sure you haven't downloaded it yet? I just updated my old MacBook Pro with Snow Leopard and it was in Software Update.app. Check /Applications/Utilities/Java Preferences and make sure the version is 1.6.0_31. The vulnerable version of Java is 1.6.0_29, I believe.
Probably not infected, unless you surf a lot of shady sites. Go here: http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/trojan-downloader_osx_flashback_i.shtml and follow their manual removal instructions. If you follow steps 1-3 and skip to 8 and you get those two error messages, then you are NOT infected.
Also if you use OS X 10.7 Lion and didn't download Java, you should not be infected with this trojan. If you use Lion w/ Java installed or Snow Leopard (10.6) which comes with Java preinstalled, you will want to follow those F-secure instructions to check if you have the trojan.
Don't forget to go to Safari>Preferences>Security tab>unclick "Enable Java".
Hope this helps!
Java 6 update 31 for Windows and Linux was released february 27 in reponse to this vulnerability. Apple releases it April 3 - and they apparently still messed it up.
If that's upping their game I'd hate to see their previous game.
Seriously, I think the media is infected with this news more than Mac's are actually infected with this malware. I have yet to come across someone who actually has this...
Isn't the source of the news the creator of the malware? I cast doubt on the 600,000 number....
Not so, Your Highness -- or at least not so in the way you're thinking. The vulnerability has been known -- and unpatched by Apple -- for months.
The thief's just appeared, but the door's been standing open for a long time.
How was Apple meant to know about it before it was used for bad stuff. If Apple could know about these risks they would have a flawless operating system from the get go. Think about that for a minute.
How was Apple meant to know about it before it was used for bad stuff. If Apple could know about these risks they would have a flawless operating system from the get go. Think about that for a minute.
Apple was "meant to know about it before it was used for bad stuff" because (a) the vulnerability was widely known, and (b) had been patched in other Java distributions. This happened many weeks before Apple made its (very belated) move.
I'd say you're the one needing to think about it for a minute. I don't think you have a good grasp of what vulnerabilities are, how they're found, what's to be done about them, and how they're exploited.