Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am phasing out iCloud from my devices, I am surprised to discover that it is in fact quite possible and fairly painless to live without being logged into iCloud. Though of course Apple does not make that easy for you
 
Has anyone said children shouldn’t be protected? You honestly think the best way to protect children and all the law abiding citizens is to scan every single Apple device in the world to catch the criminals? Any data scanning should be done server side if it legal to do so. Client side scanning of everyone’s data goes against the very nature and ethos of most democratic societies.
If the punishment for people who urge children into pornography is increased to 50 years in prison, no one will dare to indulge in their dirty fantasies. And if the police investigate such reports decisively. That's also how you try to deter drug dealers, otherwise there would be loads of drugs everywhere. Tackling the problem at its root makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nuvi
I hope Apple brings it back. We need to stop pedophiles and child sex abuse. Children need to be protected.
I’m sure those nasty evil people are already using other devices to do their evil. Devices that won’t report them.

They could buy a digital camera from the supermarket that won’t scan.

Buying an I device is totally optional,

I’d rather Apple spend money on other initiatives to stop this, even just promoting that digital photos can be used as evidence relating to who purchased the camera would make potential criminals think twice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurgDog and B4U
I am phasing out iCloud from my devices, I am surprised to discover that it is in fact quite possible and fairly painless to live without being logged into iCloud. Though of course Apple does not make that easy for you
Unlike Android, this is not too difficult, my dear:
Screenshot 2021-12-15 um 14.44.56.png
No government will allow itself to get lost in the hash world of a local photo database (Mac) from the outside, that would be too intricate.
Dark are the souls of private people who find naked tortured children horny. But that's not really what this discussion is about.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Heckles
If the punishment for people who urge children into pornography is increased to 50 years in prison, no one will dare to indulge in their dirty fantasies. And if the police investigate such reports decisively. That's also how you try to deter drug dealers, otherwise there would be loads of drugs everywhere. Tackling the problem at its root makes sense.
The root of the problem isn't having images. The root of the problem is mental health.
(So note, just playing "Devil's advocate" here)...
Just because a person is viewing these images and perhaps having unhealthy fantasies doesn't mean that they're going to act on those fantasies. We need to focus more on the actual root of the problem, and focus on mental health rather than just over-crowding the jails with people.

Once again, I'm not defending pedophiles, I'm just saying that locking someone up for having an "illegal image" and an unhealthy fantasy isn't tackling the problem at its root.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChromeAce
If the punishment for people who urge children into pornography is increased to 50 years in prison, no one will dare to indulge in their dirty fantasies. And if the police investigate such reports decisively. That's also how you try to deter drug dealers, otherwise there would be loads of drugs everywhere. Tackling the problem at its root makes sense.
Ok, in re-reading this, I completely agree. Punishing the people who are CREATING child pornography I can 100% get behind. I'm sorry that I mis-read the first time.
 
If Apple publically announced it had listened and changed course because of the backlash, it could be even better PR tbh
Wishful thinking. But I’ll take whatever I get as long as that tech is withdrawn! I’m still not updating from iOS 14 for awhile but this is positive news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smoovejayy
The root of the problem isn't having images. The root of the problem is mental health.
(So note, just playing "Devil's advocate" here)...
Just because a person is viewing these images and perhaps having unhealthy fantasies doesn't mean that they're going to act on those fantasies. We need to focus more on the actual root of the problem, and focus on mental health rather than just over-crowding the jails with people.

Once again, I'm not defending pedophiles, I'm just saying that locking someone up for having an "illegal image" and an unhealthy fantasy isn't tackling the problem at its root.
I want the photographers and videomakers in prison. This is the root. They produce the food for the evil side of the soul. Of course, Evil will then look for a new field of activity, but at least the children will no longer be in focus.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GBaughma
Good. I wrote Tim Cook such a lengthy email… I was really considering not using iCloud and looking at alternatives to their service. Not sure how they thought they wouldn’t receive that much backlash. From a company that touts privacy and security…

They should publicly announce these plans are scrapped. It would help their PR.
 
Do you think that governments can penetrate Apple's server unnoticed (without man in the middle) and understand its structure? Do you have any sources?
I'm not sure what this has to do with this topic. The government doesn't need to break in. If iPhotos remain stored unencrypted so Apple can scan server side, the government can show up with a warrant that says give us all Morgland's iCloud photos. Apple already complies today.

If we assume that this was step 1 in E2E iCloud photos (big assumption I know, but why else go through all this work?), the government completely loses the above ability.

From Apple's standpoint the more encrypted, the better. Then they don't have to fight a court order, but simply say they don't have the data. The problem is that encryption must be balanced with a) people losing their keys and b) Apple doesn't want to be a CSAM heaven. That's why we get keys in iCloud backups and a possible client side CSAM scanning implementation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brett_x
  • Haha
Reactions: VulchR
So they go quiet, remove references and then just do it anyway via a back door like the messages protection farce.
That would be even worse for their brand if caught. Oh, and this kind of thing can be exposed in many ways. Don’t even count out Apple employee whistle blowers. Many Apple employees were against on-device scanning.


Don’t ask me how I know…
 
That would be even worse for their brand if caught. Oh, and this kind of thing can be exposed in many ways. Don’t even count out Apple employee whistle blowers. Many Apple employees were against on-device scanning.


Don’t ask me how I know…
But we do remember how Apple deliberately broke FaceTime on the iOS 6, right?
 
I'm not sure what this has to do with this topic. The government doesn't need to break in. If iPhotos remain stored unencrypted so Apple can scan server side, the government can show up with a warrant that says give us all Morgland's iCloud photos. Apple already complies today.

If we assume that this was step 1 in E2E iCloud photos (big assumption I know, but why else go through all this work?), the government completely loses the above ability.

From Apple's standpoint the more encrypted, the better. Then they don't have to fight a court order, but simply say they don't have the data. The problem is that encryption must be balanced with a) people losing their keys and b) Apple doesn't want to be a CSAM heaven. That's why we get keys in iCloud backups and a possible client side CSAM scanning implementation.
Yes, thank's for your straight statement. That should be our demand to !
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: B4U
This doesn't really change anything. They've just removed references to it. I could easily see them still using it behind the scenes but just not being forthcoming. Don't be shocked if we find out later this is the case because companies do shady stuff like this all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Congratulations everyone, now what you've likely achieved is that Apple will just quietly scan iCloud Photos for CSAM server-side instead, and we'll probably never get end-to-end encryption.
Scanning server side is fine by me. As for full end to end encryption, we were never going to get that.
 
Was considering buying/switching to a iPhone before all this, now they removed it from the website, and while the damage has already been done, I might consider a iPhone again if Apple publicly says they'll scrap the whole thing. On second thought, I'll stick with my Pixel until then.
 
I hope Apple brings it back. We need to stop pedophiles and child sex abuse. Children need to be protected.
You really think people are doing stuff illegal, they are going to use a cloud service? Some crooks are stupid, but this wouldn’t help.

Would you be ok if the government put a camera in your house? for the sake of the children…
 
  • Like
Reactions: icanhazmac
Was considering buying/switching to a iPhone before all this, now they removed it from the website, and while the damage has already been done, I might consider a iPhone again if Apple publicly says they'll scrap the whole thing. On second thought, I'll stick with my Pixel until then.
I’m sticking with iPhone. However, I won’t be convinced that Apple is done with this until they actually announce it. Then I will switch iCloud Photo Library back on.
 
Now if Google would remove it’s opinion based “fact checks” (testified to that fact in court this week), we might be getting somewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BulkSlash
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.