-> Serious Security Issue.I wonder why, it was extremely useful. Maybe they are updating it?
-> Serious Security Issue.I wonder why, it was extremely useful. Maybe they are updating it?
It's a complex problem. Something like this takes time. Apple will aknowledge it eventually.
A Chinese company released a video to show how to remove a chip and reprogram it to remove the activation lock. They used this site to check to see if another number was valid and not also locked.
What if your Mac is stolen though? All the thief has to do is format your computer via safe start and you can no longer locate it with "Find My Mac" via icloud. Totally useless feature.
That's a good excuse Apple can use. Their solution will be people going to a physical Apple store to check serial numbers. Hackers can't repeatedly check numbers with that method and Apple can get a cut of used iPhone sales by charging a $10 service fee. Win-Win. Tim is a genius.
What's it like living in a house made of glass?
Because it appears this only really gained traction in October 2016 after brand new phones were showing up locked. It's reasonable to expect that it would take some time for an investigation to take place.
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/10/05/iphone-activation-lock-wrong-apple-id-issues/
Yes it does. 5m 20s.
I wasn't aware third party IMEI checks could show an iCloud lock. Can you please advise how this works?
I have to consider whether to trust the advice of somebody that engages in fraudulent activity to bypass security protocols designed to protect the average user.
I wonder why, it was extremely useful. Maybe they are updating it?
It was probably because the bad guys were using it as well. They wouldn't just take it down for no reason. The con's outweigh the pro's on this occasion.
Probably because admitting to being hacked or having a security issue is probably the worst thing you can do in terms of PR as a huge tech company right now. Apple, rightly, has a reputation as being amongst the most safe and secure products and platforms available to the general consumer. Of course they want to protect that reputation. We on MacRumors are a tiny little minority. Most Apple customers don't even know the tool existed, so coming out with a press release explaining why would be like shooting themselves in the foot.Apple could've explained why they removed it. Maybe someone working at Apple asked if they should redirect those trying to access the feature to a page explaining why this useful feature was removed and the guy in charge said why the fudge would we do that, we're Apple. Let them guess about it on MacRumors.
There's no "probably" about it. There's video showing Chinese operations set up to reset the serial numbers of stolen iOS devices in mass quantities, and Apple's Activation Lock checker is a vital part of the process.
And then you have a lot of news recently about brand new iPhones being locked to an Apple ID right out of the box because their legitimate serial numbers have been illegally assigned to a stolen device.
It's a tough problem to solve, but until Apple has a solution, they're not going to continue helping thieves.
This is exactly what happened to me when I was in the midst of selling an iPhone recently. Luckily, a phone call to Apple Support and emailing them my proof of purchase was all it took to "reset" and clear the lock.My best guess is that the tool was being exploited. I recently had a phone that I was waiting to sell added to an unknown iCloud and I had to contact Apple Support with my proof of purchase to get to removed. I bet it's not hard to brute force scrape serial numbers and then add those SNs to an iCloud account through activation request forging. I'm sure they're just patching it up and making sure this doesn't happen again.
You're saying if I buy a new phone; reset it for resale and find it's activation locked with an unknown ID; and then, having thrown away my original receipt, proceed to produce a fake receipt, that constitutes immoral behavior?
This is about the 3rd time in the last 2 months that Apple removes a service or feature instead of fixing it?
However justified their motivation is (and we don't know because they never say anything), i see a pattern there. All of you defending Apple, think about this: maybe next time they will remove a feature *you* depend on.
Just like every other remote service rate limits queries?How do you fix it? it has a key flaw which is in order to get information you need to give information. Bad people will just use random strings to check which one is available and reprogram the chips in stolen devices and then someone will buy a new iPhone which will be iCloud locked out of the box.
Just like every other remote service rate limits queries?
Geolocation. It can be done to an extent that it will make it unfeasible for mass reprogramming iphones while it will be just a minor inconvenience to legit trades. But then Apple was never famous for knowing how to do online services, just hardware.How do you rate 100 Chinese kids in a Shenzhen tower doing this simultaneously?
Geolocation. It can be done to an extent that it will make it unfeasible for mass reprogramming iphones while it will be just a minor inconvenience to legit trades. But then Apple was never famous for knowing how to do online services, just hardware.
Nah. Just to make buying used phones more of a pain. So Apple can sell more.
It's all about the Dollars.