Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So is forced obsolescence supposed to be a good or bad thing here? This forum keeps giving me mixed signals here.

No tech embracing person is against evolution, but handicapping exististing equipment with unoptimized software updates, replacing proven solutions prematurely with immature ones, and preventing hardware maintenance, is inconsiderate, self-serving, and and—in the example of Apple’s stealth throttling patch—vandalism.
 
I was trying to have my battery replaced in December. I could get appointments but would get cancelled. A 3rd party Authorised Service provider then told me that Apple were not sending them any batteries.

This was in December so I do believe that Apple themselves believe that the battery replacement program is evil and without it I would have bought a new phone.

What do you mean “would get cancelled”? I set up an appointment 4 or 5 days ahead of time and got a battery replaced on the 28th at the Easton Apple Store in Columbus, OH on my way back home from our family Christmas. Also scheduled one to be sent in to be replaced for an old 6s my wife used. Sent it in on the 31st and got it back last Friday.

There is much frustration with Apple that can be justified these days, but I don’t believe that Apple was arbitrarily cancelling appointments just to keep from replacing batteries.
[doublepost=1547566435][/doublepost]
$1,0000.00 versus $80.00 or $29.00 assumes a several things. But I am most interested in how 11 million people heard of the replacement program.

It's easy's for people like us---we follow this stuff. But for people like my mom, or people who don't know what OLED and P3 color gamut is---how did they learn of the program? It's not like Apple ran an ad campaign. Facebook sharing and other social media?

I believe I had received an email from Apple about it at one time a while back. The most likely catalyst, though, I’m guessing, is simply word of mouth. I can identify at least 5 phones belonging to friends that had batterie replaced just because I told them about the replacement program when they were having issues with losing power too quickly.
 
my wife and I both have iPhone 6's. I use mine a ton, my wife - hardly at all.

My battery was replaced in March with over 1200 cycles on it. BUT I still have issues. I believe my wifi chip is damaged. It takes a LONG time to to connect to the wifi thru mail. I get dropped safari connections too. Tons of lag, esp keyboard in messages and mail.

my wife said "eh, my phone runs fine, why replace the battery". Its a 4+ year old battery - runs fine. She drains it to maybe 75% every day and charges it again.

I believe were and tear on the device has more to do with it than battery drainage

You may have antennae problems. Nothing related to battery charge.
Which brings to the fore questions regarding the QC of battery replacements.
  1. will the unit preserve its original IP[xy] water and dust resistance rating?
  2. will the unit experience internal after-replacement problems due to poor-reassembly?
  3. will the unit undergo QC testing after-replacement?
  4. ...
I for one am skeptical of the quality of battery replacements done by either:
  1. a lowly-paid "Genius" on the crowded back of an Apple store. Or, alternatively,
  2. by a random external source hired by Apple under the covers to effect the replacements.
Either way, battery replacement of iPhones is no picnic, given that they are anchored (tightly-glued) to the back but accessed from the front.

Just a healthy, skeptical view about all this.
You may feel otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Guarantee you'll never see another program like this again. :apple:

You’re right. The Apple store’s so-called techs are barely qualified or equipped to replace batteries. Imagine how unprofitable the task is. That is why Apple “generously” hands customers “new” units rather than service the affected ones on site.

Even if you wish to replace your battery for any $ amount, Apple won’t accommodate you unless they deem it necessary. And worse, they won’t touch your phone in the future for any reason if a third party, or yourself, replaces the battery. Right To Repair laws are needed to correct that attitude.
 
Obviously Apple's reasonable battery replacement program was a big commercial failure... extending the upgrade schedule of millions of users.
 
Can’t believe this comment got so many likes.

Apple’s only mistake was trying to apply a software fix to address a hardware issue, but sure, I guess framing it as an attempt to screw their users over to force upgrades is better for garnering views and clicks.

I guess Apple should have just let those iPhones randomly reboot. Users would still have upgraded, and Apple would have saved themselves all that negative press.
It gets the most likes because most people here want to be snarky about Apple and don't really think beyond the first dig.
[doublepost=1547567243][/doublepost]
Obviously Apple's reasonable battery replacement program was a big commercial failure... extending the upgrade schedule of millions of users.
I mean, let's not overstate it. There are likely over 1B active iPhones and they replaced batteries on 11M, or ~1%. This was also in all of 2018, not just Q4.

It was an impact, but again, China was over 100% of the revenue shortfall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Obviously Apple's reasonable battery replacement program was a big commercial failure... extending the upgrade schedule of millions of users.
That is one way of thinking about it: loss of revenue.
But, not, if Apple conducted risk-analysis, considering:
  1. a successful class-action suit,
  2. resulting discovery: email exchanges showing the ugly underbelly of Apple decision making, and not-so-proud answers after questioning executives under oath.
  3. ...
Most likely than not, Apple decided that the $29 battery replacement program was less onerous to the corporation than the alternative of fighting a damaging suit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KPandian1
"We did it because we were caught slowing down phones without telling users, and had our arses sued to hell and back". Fixed that for you Timmy.
How much are you being paid to be a shill for the anti-Apple campaign? I know this to be true as much as you know what’s going on within the Apple corporate mindset, i.e. not one bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrenchRoasted
Either way, battery replacement of iPhones is no picnic, given that they are anchored (tightly-glued) to the back but accessed from the front.
For many of the older iPhones that the discount battery program applies to, it's an easy swap. The batteries are glued, but they use the 3M type stretch strips that easily pull out. Also, I've heard (could turn out to be not true) that if the glue strips break during the replacement process, they won't continue with the swap and they'll give you a refurb unit.
 
My 6S+ was starting to drain randomly. One night, it went from 70$ to 15% in just 6 hrs while I was at work and I never got to use my phone the entire time. Apple ran a test on the phone and said the battery was good

Same experience here with 6s: it hit a point where it would drain normally to around 70% then quickly plummet to nearly drained with little use. iOS battery test reported 86% capacity and the Apple store test said the battery was healthy. They replaced it anyway as it was listed for a free battery replacement due to manufacturing defect. No more flaky battery, yay!

My take away is the iOS battery test and Apple store battery test don't tell you much about actual battery health.
 
When home from School, my son went in to get his iPhone 6 battery replaced - just before the deadline.
They refused to fix it because they observed a very slight bend in the phone. Double whammy from Apple.
 
I'd say it's iOS12 that pushed me not to upgrade.
Prior to iOS12, I was already itching for the iPhone XR. Then came iOS12, and then I replaced the battery on my 6S with Apple for free, and wow, it performs like when it was new. I really don't have any complaints other than the overall battery life (couldn't help it as the 6S has the smallest iPhone battery amongst the iPhone 6-8 generations). The only things left that are tempting me to update are the improved camera quality on the XR and the HEIC format, but those didn't tip the point enough.

I really hope Apple sees this as a wake up call to really push on the services. You can only keep selling phones for so long. The only thing that can keep bringing constant revenue form existing customers are services. iCloud and Apple music are a good start, but Apple needs to be more aggressive in this. Things like bundling together the services. or making it easy for users to switch regions, anything. Right now, Apple's model for services are still the same old one since .mac. Heck, they can start by making the iPhone upgrade program worldwide, and offer iCloud and Apple music as additional bundling option. I know I would jump on that if Apple ever offered it in my region. But it seems Apple is still comfortable in their current model of selling premium hardware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: martyjmclean
Whatever the verdict here, Cook lost in all instances:
- taking the blame & all negative publication around Throttlegate
- making batt replacement decision in wild panic, completely ignoring its effect on sales, causing a disastrous Q1 2019
- completely out of touch with the market and financial world via price hikes
- completely lost market outlook in China/India due to price levels
- collective effect: $450B loss in stock value

I leave it to you to assess the overall effect, plus or minus...
Assess what? The effect of your straw man argument?
 
Last edited:
My iPhone 6S Plus was shutting down and rebooting when the battery was low and the ambient temperature was very hot or very cold, until the update that "slowed down phones". Once I had installed that update, those issues stopped, but the phone ran slower. That's nothing to sue over.

LOL, that's nothing to sue over? The phone has a design defect that causes it to reboot at peak current demands on average-wear batteries, something no other model of phone has ever had on a systemic basis, which Apple tried to hide by pushing out a stealth update to slow the processor to the point of being unusable to prevent peak current, then lied about the reason behind the update, and that's nothing to sue over? Pass me some of that Koolaid you're drinking please.
 
GOod...now replace all the xs and max models with newer modem chip.
They do.
[doublepost=1547568591][/doublepost]
You weren't paying attention then to Apple's behaviour in how they delivered and tried to cover it up.

I, and I'm sure almost everyone else agrees that a phone that's throttled is better than a phone that's randomly shutting down.

The problem is, Apple didn't tell it's users that was what was happening. When asked if they throttled old phones, they outright said "no".

During this "No" phase, if users came to Apple stores complaining about slow devices, Apple would push users to buy new devices instead of replacing the battery. In fact, during the "no" stage, Apple was not telling the stores what the root cause was. So the battery tests the stores had did not test for this sort of degradation. So when their batteries passed the old tests, Apple also refused battery service (even paid) to these users.

It was only after a bunch of intrepid testers were able to verify and prove that some devices were being throttled, that Apple finally admitted that they did roll out a patch to solve the shutdown problem, and that involved throttling.

Apple was forced to do the cheap battery replacement program because the very cause of the whole thing was Apple underspeccing the battery for the power draw required by their CPU's. This is a design flaw. They failed to account in the design 1-2 years down the line after a battery started to degrade, that the power output itself might not be sufficient for the CPU.

So while the throttling solution over crashing phones does help and provide a work around for the underspecced batteries, it does not excuse the company for how they handled, obfuscated and tried to bury what was going on. And the evidence today about how many people chose battery replacements over new phones is prime evidence WHY they did bury it.
Typical tinfoil hat comment.
 
My iPhone 6S Plus was shutting down and rebooting when the battery was low and the ambient temperature was very hot or very cold, until the update that "slowed down phones". Once I had installed that update, those issues stopped, but the phone ran slower. That's nothing to sue over.

People were also sueing about the design flaw that caused your shutdowns and reboots. This has been discussed dozens of times on the forums feel free to read some of those threads for more details.
 
Do
LOL, that's nothing to sue over? The phone has a design defect that causes it to reboot at peak current demands on average-wear batteries, something no other model of phone has ever had on a systemic basis, which Apple tried to hide by pushing out a stealth update to slow the processor to the point of being unusable to prevent peak current, then lied about the reason behind the update, and that's nothing to sue over? Pass me some of that Koolaid you're drinking please.
do you even read what you type, lol?
 
I can’t imagine that Apple “lost” any money with the battery program. The battery should have cost $29 to begin with, it doesn’t cost Apple $79 to swap the battery and if it does they need to figure out a cheaper, easier way to replace iPhone batteries.
This is another attempt to totally ignore the fact that the iPhone in it's current state and price isn't competitive anymore. Tim can come up with batteries, people holding longer before upgrading or whatever assumption he has in his pipeline...

Apple has got out of touch with reality. That's the problem.

After Mobile World Congres in februari, this problem will be even bigger!
 
Apple’s only mistake was trying to apply a software fix to address a hardware issue, but sure, I guess framing it as an attempt to screw their users over to force upgrades is better for garnering views and clicks.

I guess Apple should have just let those iPhones randomly reboot. Users would still have upgraded, and Apple would have saved themselves all that negative press.

I don’t believe Apple was trying to handicap existing phones and encourage upgrades with its patch. That outcome would have occurred naturally with units that had defective power management chips. Apple was trying to disguise such a defect because the cost of another product recall would have been costly even to their reputation. The software patch was meant to disguise a hardware defect or flaw with the power management chip. It was not a fix! Otherwise, performance would have returned to a normal baseline!

This isn’t to say that Apple isn’t complicit in forcing unnecessary hardware upgrades. They have been silent about the battery’s role in performance degradation since the phone’s inception. They routinely refused battery replacements to suspecting customers. They refuse to sell OEM batteries to third party parts and repair services.

Apple deserves respect for its engineering prowess, but its character has suffered enormously during the company’s growth. Lawyers and bean counters are running the show.
 
I don't normally post but...

If planned obsolescence was fake news, then how can these phones no longer becoming obsolete be blamed for their plans being altered?

If Cook is basically saying, "People kept their phones longer than we planned for them to keep them thanks to this stupid repair program we were forced to setup," how is that NOT an admission of planned obsolescence?
Because you attribute your own thoughts to what was said in a poor attempt at a straw man argument.
[doublepost=1547569123][/doublepost]
Do you ever write anything of substance?
Sometimes :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.