Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think we all agree that Apple refurbs have excellent quality. I just don't believe that apple replaces every iPhone case in a refurb.

I would even argue that Apple has the best quality refurbs in the market. Though people have to be realistic that these are returned goods and given the reduction in price, people can expect some wear.

I agree with you on your second paragraph, but I think we disagree on the first.
 
I think you're missing the point of him putting his trust in Apples Customer service.

It would have been nice of them to say "by the way, we only replace hardware here with refurbs if you bought it from a third party, is that ok?"

Especially as its a two week old phone. Would have been nice to get some proper advice.

They did, in fact, tell the OP that it would be replaced with a refurb. He even signed a contract permitting such.

This debacle is entirely on the OP from his sense of entitlement, bad attitude, and impatience.
 
I agree with you on your second paragraph, but I think we disagree on the first.

That's fair enough.

I am happy to be proven wrong on the first point. Though like I said, I cannot find confirmation of it anywhere.
 
I think its rich to come to a conclusion that an Assembly worker scratched the unit. Its like blaming the cleaners everytime something goes missing in the office, its not on.
While I agree that nobody has enough facts to conclusively say that an assembly worker caused a physical blemish on an iPhone, given the fact that there are a lot of posts here on MacRumors from people who received a brand-new iPhone (shipped to them directly from the assembly line in China) that came out of an undamaged product box with physical blemishes on it, I don't think it's unreasonable to come to that conclusion.

My question is, why would apple replace the shell on all iphones that are returned. This makes no sense, a large majority would comeback in perfect condition, Apple would only replace the ones ones that have defects or scratches.
Here are quotes/links from Apple's online refurbished store where Apple states that they replace the shell (and battery) on all iPads and iPods (inc. iPod touch). IIRC, part of the reason this is done is because these devices get new serial numbers, which are printed on the back of the exterior shell.

iPad
All refurbished iPad models also include a brand new battery and outer shell.
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/ipad
Or for the UK:
http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/home/specialdeals/ipad

iPod (including iPod touch)
All refurbished iPod models also include a brand new battery and outer shell.
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/ipod
Or for the UK:
http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/home/specialdeals/ipod

Please feel free to provide me with some sort of evidence that all refurbs get a new shell. No one has been able to do it.
Apple doesn't sell refurbished iPhones, so there's nothing on its website to quote/link to. My evidence comes from my training when I worked for Apple Retail.

I have received refurb laptops from Apple, and frankly it was a lottery, some were like brand new, while others had tiny bit of wear, which I accepted.
Correct. Apple doesn't replace exterior shells on Macs.
 
While I agree that nobody has enough facts to conclusively say that an assembly worker caused a physical blemish on an iPhone, given the fact that there are a lot of posts here on MacRumors from people who received a brand-new iPhone (shipped to them directly from the assembly line in China) that came out of an undamaged product box with physical blemishes on it, I don't think it's unreasonable to come to that conclusion.


Here are quotes/links from Apple's online refurbished store where Apple states that they replace the shell (and battery) on all iPads and iPods (inc. iPod touch). IIRC, part of the reason this is done is because these devices get new serial numbers, which are printed on the back of the exterior shell.

iPad

http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/ipad
Or for the UK:
http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/home/specialdeals/ipad

iPod (including iPod touch)

http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/ipod
Or for the UK:
http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/home/specialdeals/ipod


Apple doesn't sell refurbished iPhones, so there's nothing on its website to quote/link to. My evidence comes from my training when I worked for Apple Retail.


Correct. Apple doesn't replace exterior shells on Macs.

Well thank you, that is what I wanted to know. Your the first person to have explained they actually worked for Apple and know how the process works. I stand corrected.

I understood why Ipads and ipods had to have thier cases replaced, due to the serial numbers.

Though as I stated with the Iphone, the SN live on the Sim Tray, hence replacement of the shell would be optional.
 
Last edited:
Though as I stated with the Iphone, the SN live on the Sim Tray, hence replacement of the shell would be optional.
I'm not sure when that changed, but there's no SN (IMEI for iPhones, but same difference) on my iPhone 5s tray. Maybe that changed back when iPhones went to nano-SIMs?
 
But.... the ops 2 weeks old iPhone is used.... why does op "deserve" a new one from apple where he didn't directly purchase it? Appl eis replacing a used phone with a refurb. Makes perfect sense to me.
 
5. Apple refurbs are as good as if not better than new. When Apple refurbs an iPhone they strip it, give it an entirely new shell and replace any parts with new parts if they fail under testing. When they're done with that Apple runs the phone through the same battery of tests as the new phones.

Yeah, they're tested to "the same basic technical guidelines" as factory new, which means the same tests that let the bad unit through in the first place :)

People often try to claim that refurbs are "better than new", to which I always wryly reply, "Then why does Apple charge so much less for them?"

If you REALLY believe that a used refurb is as good as new, then I have a deal for you: you buy an iPhone 6 new in the box and hold onto it until I can buy a refurb iPhone 6 for hundreds of dollars less.

Then we'll trade. You should be so happy getting something "as good as or even better", right?

Heh. Right.

Look, I buy Apple refurbs all the time, but only because they're cheaper, not because I think they're somehow better.
 
They did, in fact, tell the OP that it would be replaced with a refurb. He even signed a contract permitting such.

This debacle is entirely on the OP from his sense of entitlement, bad attitude, and impatience.

"in Fact"??

I must have missed the bit where the Rep told the OP they were getting a refurb when they bought in their phone.

I know you're getting at the fact it was written and the OP signed it but that's not the same as telling someone personally.

This debacle is entirely on the OP from his sense of entitlement, bad attitude, and impatience.

Sense of entitlement? They went to Apple because they were told they could.

Bad Attitude? They only got the hump because of the way Apple handled the situation. (very unlike Apple)

Impatience? Would you prefer to return something via post or in person?? I know which one i'd do.

I'm not saying Apple are in the wrong here but a simple clear bit of advice regarding the refurb would have been helpful.
 
Yeah, they're tested to "the same basic technical guidelines" as factory new, which means the same tests that let the bad unit through in the first place :)

People often try to claim that refurbs are "better than new", to which I always wryly reply, "Then why does Apple charge so much less for them?"

If you REALLY believe that a used refurb is as good as new, then I have a deal for you: you buy an iPhone 6 new in the box and hold onto it until I can buy a refurb iPhone 6 for hundreds of dollars less.

Then we'll trade. You should be so happy getting something "as good as or even better", right?

Heh. Right.

Look, I buy Apple refurbs all the time, but only because they're cheaper, not because I think they're somehow better.
HUH??? :confused:

So…you're saying that if I went online or to an Apple store and asked them for a refurb 5s 64GB I would pay much less than a new 5s 64GB?

Or are you saying that there are current model iPhones in the Apple refurb store selling for less?

Or are you saying both?

I ask, because I've never heard of Apple selling current model refurbs either online or at an Apple store.

In the case of previous models the price drop is explainable because it's not current and it's not new either. But nether of those automatically suggest that is not as good as new.

Again, my own refurb iPhone 5 is better than the one I got on launch day.

Or were you referring to the refurbs that you get anyplace other than directly from Apple? Because, quite honestly, I don't know where those come from (I'm guessing not Apple) and I'm not incline to buy a refurb non-current model from any place other than Apple.
 
Yeah, they're tested to "the same basic technical guidelines" as factory new, which means the same tests that let the bad unit through in the first place :)

But all mass produced assembly lines, only a small select number in each run is tested for QA. Much too costly if every one is tested. This is why refurbs are considered safer since all units must pass QA procedures.
 
Apple once tried to pass off a 5s refurb to me as well; my phone was a couple days old. I ended up going home with it but then realized I was foolish to take a refurb for a week old phone. I simply brought the refurb back to them with the box and accessories for my original phone, and they processed a return/exchange for me.
 
I've not been back to CPW since they refuse to swap a phone a day after the 28 day warranty when the handset (Samsung GS2) developed a mic fault. I don't ever want to give them my custom again. This time around I've had nothing but good things to say about Apples customer service and thorough assistance when upgrading in store and leaving with a fully functioning device! Apple I'm sure would have been more lenient towards a fault.
 
Apple once tried to pass off a 5s refurb to me as well; my phone was a couple days old. I ended up going home with it but then realized I was foolish to take a refurb for a week old phone. I simply brought the refurb back to them with the box and accessories for my original phone, and they processed a return/exchange for me.

Did you buy it from Apple directly?
 
Yes, I did purchase it from Apple.

That is the difference. You bought your phone directly from Apple and you were within the return period. Therefore, you could have returned or exchanged your phone for another one for any reason.

The OP bought his from a third party, therefore it does not fall under Apple's return policy.
 
I feel like I've been too trusting of Apple. Every iPhone I've had I needed a replacement for one reason or the other and I will say however that I've had very good experiences with the Apple store and they handle my replacement request very easily. The problem is I have to go once or twice more before I can stop visiting. I've never had hardware issues such as scratches or dents but I have had a lot of software problems which required me to go in again.
 
Hey could you tell me how this can be done? I've been considering calling up and trying to get as far up the ladder as I can on the phone and trying to appeal this decision.

Also, to everyone who is backing apple and telling me to be happy with it etc, I am having problems with this second replacement as I mentioned in my op. It's not scrolling anywhere near how smoothly it should be. Very jerky, have reinstalled, reset etc. seems to be a hardware issue again. These are not very well made phones.

Yes I will be happy to PM you. Im in the US our time zones are quite different.

----------

Is BB still operating in the UK? I thought they'd shut down.

not sure, I'm in the US.




Where Apple says its refurbs are put in a new shell is BS. Ive had every iPhone since 2007, and every single replacement Ive ever got had scratches on the band and marks. The shell is not replaced. It was like this with my 2g, 3g, 3GS, especially the 4. Idk about the 4S, the 5 was awful, and the 5S is actually decent in terms of refurb quality.
 
Last edited:
Where Apple says its refurbs are put in a new shell is BS. Ive had every iPhone since 2007, and every single replacement Ive ever got had scratches on the band and marks. The shell is not replaced. It was like this with my 2g, 3g, 3GS, especially the 4. Idk about the 4S, the 5 was awful, and the 5S is actually decent in terms of refurb quality.

I'm pretty sure they do. I've had a replacement 3GS, 4 and two 5's and they've all been perfect cosmetically, and functionally. Maybe I was lucky on the function of the refurbs, but the 5's (which are infamous for the anodising being worn around the edges) were both perfect - just like buying it new.

For the second 5 that was replaced, it was earlier this year, so it was definitely a refurb.

Of course, the amount of replacements I've had to have don't paint a pretty picture, but I have to say my experience with refurbs have been great.
 
I'm pretty sure they do. I've had a replacement 3GS, 4 and two 5's and they've all been perfect cosmetically, and functionally. Maybe I was lucky on the function of the refurbs, but the 5's (which are infamous for the anodising being worn around the edges) were both perfect - just like buying it new.

For the second 5 that was replaced, it was earlier this year, so it was definitely a refurb.

Of course, the amount of replacements I've had to have don't paint a pretty picture, but I have to say my experience with refurbs have been great.

I have had to have my iPhone 4 and 5 replaced under warranty. Both of my replacements looked like they just came out of a new retail box. Had I not seen them take it out of the white box in front of me I would not have known the difference.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.