Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why does it require an OS Update to update a single app anyway? The whole thing is ridiculous. Just provide a calendar update from the app store when it's ready? Google changed this forever ago.
Because Apple needs a reason to hype up OS updates as if they contain major enhancements. Half of the advertised "improvements" on every iOS update are merely just app updates.
 
People getting this worked up over a rumor about something that hasn't even happened is genuinely fascinating.
 
you know apple isn't the same anymore when macrumors is actively critical of it.

i remember just a few years ago how blindly users here made excuses for apple. happy to see this change in the community. sad to see this change in apple.

The major difference in Apple is the same as the major change in the community-- both are much bigger. Beyond that, both act essentially the same. Apple continues on its own path, deciding for itself what is best for the customer as they always have. The community continues to falsely believe they're in a relationship with a corporation and brand it as abusive.

You won't find a time in the archives of this site where the community conversation couldn't be summarized as "I hate Apple because they're too expensive and lacking features but I know they love me anyway." Everything is just at much larger scale now.

Combine that with the fact that the much larger scale has caused the formation of an entire industry around rumor mongering, not just here but at major media and investment firms, and a social media landscape where people try to convince the world they know what they don't just for clicks, and we get a combination of false reports and up close sausage making tours that feed the current generation's overwhelming cynicism and offends its sense of entitlement.
 
Software is the classic example of how you can not simply add workers and get s faster result. It is kind of like trying to get nine women to make a baby in one month. Some things need to be done serially and you need time to iterate and review, and rework.

With software, it is the quality, not the quantity of workers. OK, an exception is testing. you CAN put a ton of people on that and find problems fast. But then you have to assign bugs to engineers and track the fixes and fold them all together, this is a bottleneck that is hard to speed up.

What you want is a smaller number of smarter workers. In software, in any small group of about 6 people you will find the best is twice as productive as the average. There is a large diversity of productivity
Surely 2 smart people in a room working on a project is faster than 1.
 
Why does it require an OS Update to update a single app anyway? The whole thing is ridiculous. Just provide a calendar update from the app store when it's ready? Google changed this forever ago.

I think it's because of the frameworks. Apps depend a lot on frameworks.
 
I'm not a developer so I have no idea how much time and resources are needed for app development. But... I do know that apple is a trillion dollar company. So it legit amazes me that enough coders and such aren't hired and used to push features on time. I don’t want half baked apps either, but then again, you'd think that with all that cash on hand, they could release all the features on schedule.
Yes. Exactly this. Jobs used to say that Apple didn't have the resources of the larger companies. Things have changed a lot since then. Or at least they should have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BB1970
I hope this means that aside from a visual upgrade they’re going to focus on fixing some of the crazy amount of bugs. We see when a new version comes out and that this will be one of the more stable versions of their operating systems.

That and hopefully add the missing features, they promised us.
 
Surely 2 smart people in a room working on a project is faster than 1.
Surely two fast runners together are faster than one...

1749261373184.png
 
That's not how software development works. That's not the way most things work. There's a limit to how parallel you can be in solving most problems. The more complex the problem, the harder this can be. You need to build the first floor before you build the second, for example.

It's also a major source of bugs-- a lot of bugs happen because two developers didn't communicate on how their parts of the code were meant to interact. The number of interactions grow much much faster than the number of developers.
The jokes write themselves. You didn't even try to change the wording up lmaoo.

Bugs are ofc part of development, but not to the level that Apple is at. That is just an excuse.
As far as communication (or lack thereof), that signals incompetence. The code base should be clean, and Engineers should be onboarded more effectively. Apple is definitely cutting corners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BB1970
The jokes write themselves. You didn't even try to change the wording up lmaoo.
I didn’t need to change the wording, you had it exactly right.

Bugs are ofc part of development, but not to the level that Apple is at. That is just an excuse.
As far as communication (or lack thereof), that signals incompetence. The code base should be clean, and Engineers should be onboarded more effectively. Apple is definitely cutting corners.
And all measurements are without error, and all corners square, and people always smile, and every day should be sunny…. Lmaooo

Communication bandwidth is always limited. Failure to recognize the reality and challenges of a complex development would signal incompetence.
 
I'm not a developer so I have no idea how much time and resources are needed for app development. But... I do know that apple is a trillion dollar company. So it legit amazes me that enough coders and such aren't hired and used to push features on time. I don’t want half baked apps either, but then again, you'd think that with all that cash on hand, they could release all the features on schedule.
It’s the contrast that amazes me. Apple achieves difficult software feats like world-beating AR tracking and pinning, multi-touch interaction that the market still hasn’t quite caught up to, two incredibly seamless ISA transitions—yet can’t swap out a calendar app within a year and a half? I suppose I should just be thankful it’s not the other way around…
 
  • Like
Reactions: AssassuN and BB1970
Better that Apple announces the changes only after it is ready and a bug free experience is possible. Happy with how the calendar app is today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
I'm not a developer so I have no idea how much time and resources are needed for app development. But... I do know that apple is a trillion dollar company. So it legit amazes me that enough coders and such aren't hired and used to push features on time. I don’t want half baked apps either, but then again, you'd think that with all that cash on hand, they could release all the features on schedule.
I think is not a question of number of heads but more a planning issue. I would expect from a company like Apple to have better planning and scheduling of tasks to achieve the features. Here we are talking about a delay of years, which means that there is something terribly wrong there. I think they should make Craig to step down, everything started to go wrong once he was on charge of software engineering.
 
…… It took number of multi hours meetings to postpone not announced features for dozens of top managers.
 
My calendar on the company's Exchange Server (yup, MS) does this since, IDK, 2006 or something.
I wish to heck our exchange server did this.
Boogles the mind to comprehend why Apple needs 2 years to implement software that already worked when they bought said company. Oh well.
I understand why, because it’s not as easy as all that to integrate foreign code bases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjs916
The only change I want in Calendar app on iPhone is an option to remove the separator between months making the month-to-month view uninterrupted and continuous, just like on Mac.

Compare the two. Calendar on iPhone has a separator between June 30th and July 1st, while Calendar on Mac does not.

View attachment 2516843View attachment 2516842
This would be a great option to add as a toggle.
 
Who will need a new physical smartphone in his/her hands in 2027 if by 2030, there will be no more physical devices to be held in hands, only glasses and AI clips? Everything will be AR/VR. Hands free.
So this is the "visionary" part you're claiming about yourself on Alamy? lol
 
I'm not a developer so I have no idea how much time and resources are needed for app development. But... I do know that apple is a trillion dollar company. So it legit amazes me that enough coders and such aren't hired and used to push features on time. I don’t want half baked apps either, but then again, you'd think that with all that cash on hand, they could release all the features on schedule.
While they do make a ton of money, so your point should still stand, I just wanted to point out that they don’t actually have that much “cash on hand”. That’s the value the outstanding shares of the company are worth. You’ll notice that changes daily in response to rumors and news.

The still large pile of money they actually sit on is far less than 3 Trillion.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.