Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Apple is looking to acquire AI chip companies as part of an effort to reduce its dependence on Nvidia for demanding AI workloads, according to The Information.

apple-silicon-feature-joeblue.jpg

Apple currently handles some AI processing in its own data centers using its own chips, but relies on Nvidia hardware housed within Google Cloud for more demanding tasks, an arrangement that includes the Gemini model powering the overhauled version of Siri. Apple's own AI server chip, internally code-named Baltra, had been expected to ship this year but has been delayed, according to people said to be familiar with the project.

Apple has historically limited its acquisitions to deals in the hundreds of millions of dollars and avoided large purchases, but that approach appears to be shifting. In January, Apple completed its acquisition of Q.ai, an Israeli company specializing in interpreting speech through facial micromovements, paying close to $2 billion, second only to the $3 billion Apple paid for Beats Electronics in 2014.

Apple also signaled a change in financial strategy during its most recent quarterly earnings call, when CFO Kevan Parekh told analysts the company would no longer target "net cash neutral" status, a policy under which it had kept its cash reserves roughly in line with its total debt. Apple did not explain the reasoning behind the change, though the added flexibility could free up capital for larger acquisitions.

Apple is already reportedly pursuing acquisitions of AI companies that could help shrink AI models for more efficient use on iPhone.

It is also worth noting that Apple's own in-house chip design capabilities originated with an acquisition. In 2008, the company acquired PA Semi for $278 million, a deal that laid the foundation for the custom processors now used across many of its product lines.

Impending leadership transitions could also bring a more aggressive approach to dealmaking, with hardware chief John Ternus set to succeed Tim Cook as CEO in September, and chip executive Johny Srouji being given expanded responsibility over all of Apple's hardware engineering, in addition to semiconductors.

Apple's chip design team has traditionally focused on battery-powered mobile devices rather than the high-performance server chips required to compete with Nvidia, the dominant supplier of AI server hardware. That limitation became apparent during development of the revamped Siri, when engineers reportedly attempted to run Google's Gemini models on Apple's own server infrastructure but found that the chips, designed with Mac workloads in mind, could not handle a model of that scale. As a result, Apple was required to process portions of the new Siri's workload using Nvidia chips within Google's cloud infrastructure.

Acquiring outside chip expertise would complement work already underway internally. Apple is currently developing a server chip based on the M5 Ultra chip, according to Bloomberg, while a future M7 Ultra chip is reportedly intended to substantially improve AI performance to a level that could begin to rival Nvidia's Blackwell chip. The M7 Ultra is expected to support up to 1.5TB of memory, roughly double the capacity of M5 Ultra, though Bloomberg added that a server chip based on M7 Ultra is unlikely to be ready before 2029.

Acquisitions represent only one avenue Apple is pursuing to reduce its reliance on Nvidia. The Information first reported Apple's collaboration with Broadcom on an AI server chip in 2024, and Broadcom confirmed in a securities filing last week that the companies had extended that partnership through 2031.

Article Link: Apple Reportedly Looking to Acquire AI Chip Companies
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
Tim Apple was late to every party. New CEO seems to be more proactive.
Tim Cook is still the CEO so giving credit to John Ternus seems premature. Also, considering the uncertainty about AI's future (it's here to stay, but there is likely some level of bubble with the current build-out), Apple's approach will likely pay off better long-term.

Also, Apple was "late" to the portable music player party, the smartphone party (first smartphone was released in 1994), and other products. Being "first" isn't a virtue by itself.

Additionally, considering how much people complain about AI, datacenters, etc., I think most people are likely happy with the approach Apple is taking towards AI.
 
Last edited:
Great. That’s what we all need. More AI stuff.
I agree 💯
Why can’t we just live without having AI forced upon every aspect of our daily lives. Oh yeah, I almost forgot the monetization of data mining, surveillance and control. 😂
There are legitimate areas to utilize AI that has the potential to benefit humanity such as research, academia, medicine etc… I often wonder at what point are we going to be content with our current lives (as a society) … slowly we are being corralled into the control of AI. ✌🏻🙏🏻
 
Last edited:
No point in having the cash pile if you're not going to use it.

Go for it!

The PA Semi thing was game changing, as this could also be.
Seems like a good way to waste a lot of money (and then “have to” lay off a lot of people) to me. Do I need to recite some in the long list of companies seemingly intent on following such a playbook?

You can always stash cash in US treasuries, return money to shareholders as dividends or stock buybacks, or corner the market on key production inputs—all things Apple has done in the past. Also, a recession will happen. The US has avoided one with a stupendous amount of government intervention and spending (resulting in serious, continued elevated inflation and government ownership of companies which used to be anathema to some) . . . but the fundamentals of macroeconomics are still true. Even your Uber driver will tell you there is a massive bubble. When the recession happens, Apple will be in a position of strength compared with many companies that are very debt-ridden.
 
I agree 💯
Why can’t we just live without having AI forced upon every aspect of our daily lives. Oh yeah, I almost forgot the monetization of data mining, surveillance and control. 😂
There are legitimate areas to utilize AI that has the potential to benefit humanity such as research, academia, medicine etc… I often wonder at what point are we going to be content with our current lives (as a society) … slowly we are being corralled into the control of AI. ✌🏻🙏🏻
I'm old enough to remember when the VP at Motorola (back in the pager days, in Austin TX) threw a carafe of coffee against the wall while arguing with the VP of Sony, over making digital Pagers. Motorola was the premier pager company, and had a thriving flip phone business.

They were unwilling to keep up and predict the future. Today, there are generations who have no idea who Motorola was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672 and jonahj
Tim Cook is still the CEO so giving credit to John Ternus seems premature. Also, considering the uncertainty about AI's future (it's here to stay, but there is likely some level of bubble with the current build-out), Apple's approach will likely pay off better long-term.

Also, Apple was "late" to the portable music player party, the smartphone party (first smartphone was released in 1994), and some others. Considering how much people complain about AI, I think most people are happy with the approach Apple is taking towards AI.
They were late to the mapping party, but you're right, I'm glad that after so many years Apple has surpassed Google's Streetview coverage....
 
Perception: Apple Intelligence
Reality: not Apple Intelligence

Perception: m chips for ai
Reality: not m chips for ai.
 
Apple has avoided becoming irrelevant because of it's M series chips, you would have thought they would have been more on the ball with this line of thinking far earlier. Especially as Nvidia has been eating everyone's lunch and has been among the only companies making money on AI
 
Apple is currently developing a server chip based on the M5 Ultra chip, according to Bloomberg, while a future M7 Ultra chip is reportedly intended to substantially improve AI performance to a level that could begin to rival Nvidia's Blackwell chip. The M7 Ultra is expected to support up to 1.5TB of memory, roughly double the capacity of M5 Ultra, though Bloomberg added that a server chip based on M7 Ultra is unlikely to be ready before 2029.​

There are rumors that report the M7 is being fast-tracked to supersede the M6 within a shorter than normal time frame.

I’d wager Apple scrapped the M5 Ultra as a basis for their “Baltra” AI server chip and instead jumped to the M7 architecture. In the meantime, they chose to go with Nvidia to run their AFM3 Cloud Pro model util this new chip is finished. This could also be the reason the new AI server chip has supposedly been delayed. While the M7 Ultra might not be ready until 2029 for Macs, the “Baltra” server chip based on the same generation could be tapped out years before it. Ternus is a hardware guy, so I’d expect them to get really aggressive about it out the door and into data centers. The deal recently made with Broadcom backs this up as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: d-klumpp
Apple has avoided becoming irrelevant because of it's M series chips, you would have thought they would have been more on the ball with this line of thinking far earlier. Especially as Nvidia has been eating everyone's lunch and has been among the only companies making money on AI

Apple makes consumer products. High end chips in data centers aren’t their market. They originally never planned on running a high end AI model, they were going to leave that to other developers via model extensions; ChatGPT. That plan must’ve fallen on its face (probably security reasons) and they had to go back to the drawing board, hence the deal with Google to license their frontier model, so Siri would have its own complex world knowledge model. Problem with that was,while their own AI servers using M2 Ultra are capable of handling their AFM3 Cloud model, they were not adept at handling more complex requests. So in the meantime, they turned to Google’s cloud hosting Nvidia based servers.

Eventually Apple will have their own data centers with their own AI servers that can handle their AFM3 Cloud Pro model, and get rid of their reliance on Nvidia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Apple should be acquiring a memory foundry.
Why do so few companies make memory? My understanding is there's two companies in South Korea, one in the US, and one in China. I'm under the impression it's not that complicated of a component (relative to CPU/GPU) but there's many times more companies that design and manufacture those than memory.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.