Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Exactly. Apple needs something to really make a big splash for this Christmas. Their last two big releases - iPhone 4S and new iPad seem so boring. I have an iPad 1 and had planned on getting the new iPad but took my 1 in to do a side by side comparison and just saw no reason to do the upgrade. Yes it has the much better resolution but how good a screen do you need? But if an iPad mini is released I will be at the head of the line to buy one.

Actually the new iPad is a nice upgrade for those with a first generation iPad. I'm betting that the first gen iPad falls off the wagon in performance once iOS 6.0 hits this year.

You're going to need a dual core processor and faster graphics. Count on it.
 
I'd rather have a 7.85" iPad for $299 than an iPad 2 for the same price. It's about size for me and I'm sure it would be for others. Also, the market may not be too receptive to buy a 2 year old product. They want the latest and greatest.

Same here, I've almost pulled the trigger on the iPad a couple of times but I think it's just a little too big. I've played with them a few times at the Apple Store and my friends have them. Just wish they were a little smaller.
 
the size thing

Yea my last GF said it was about the size also maybe that's why she dumped me.
 
Make it a DSLR monitor.
Make it a DSLR monitor.
Make it a DSLR monitor.
Make it a DSLR monitor.
Make it a DSLR monitor.
Make it a DSLR monitor.
Make it a DSLR monitor.
Make it a DSLR monitor.
Make it a DSLR monitor.
Make it a DSLR monitor.

Fools.

Yes. Video capable too, please.
 
My eyesight isn't what it used to be so I'm hoping for at least a 12 inch iPhone and 21 inch iPad this time 'round.
 
Smaller? What a rubbish idea, could go a 12" iPad though.

Bigger? what a rubbish idea, could go a 7.85" iPad though.
(see how that works? What works for me may not work for you.)

----------

Wouldn't that be a little disrespectful to Steve Jobs?
He said he didn't like 7 inch tablets... (Didnt he? Or am I imagining it? :s)

This isn't 7".
But whatever the size, just how long are people going to insist that a head-fake by a no-longer-with-us executive is somehow a binding legal contract?
 
Exactly. Apple needs something to really make a big splash for this Christmas. Their last two big releases - iPhone 4S and new iPad seem so boring. I have an iPad 1 and had planned on getting the new iPad but took my 1 in to do a side by side comparison and just saw no reason to do the upgrade. Yes it has the much better resolution but how good a screen do you need? But if an iPad mini is released I will be at the head of the line to buy one.

I kept the iPad 1 up until the new one came out. The new iPad is way better than the 1st gen. The resolution makes reading and browsing so much better. Use the new one for 2 weeks and then go back to your iPad 1 and you will be like 'wow! This one is much slower and the text is nowhere near as sharp.'
 
That's exactly what is wrong. This 'mini' should not simply be a lower price point iPad. There are people who want a powerful and useful full fledged tablet with iOS but at 7" and not 10".

I disagree. Apple currently offers 4" and 10" iPads (I'm going back to my points that the iPod Touch and the iPhone are essentially smaller versions of the iPad).

Adding a 7.85" in the mix, at the pricepoints theorized, is just going to muddy the waters. Think about...as a consumer you're going to see a Touch, a Phone, and 2 iPads...3 of those 4 devices sit in the $249 - $299 range. Now you create/find a comparison chart of the features. Pretty much all the same features except for sizes and the ability to make a phone call. People are not necessarily going to buy the iPad Mini. The 4" models fit in your pocket. The 10" isn't that much larger than a 7.85" inch...neither are going to fit in your pocket and maybe not even a woman's purse.

Being slightly larger here and there (and I'm sure Apple will muck around with the features, too, so they can keep their hefty margins) isn't going to attract loads of people.

As I said, the iPods (and I believe iPhones) all dropped in price as they matured. Next is Gen 4 of iPad...I think the 10" is a great size FOR A TABLET...they would be much smarter to drop the price $50-$100 (or add a lower-low end for that discount) than create a whole new "line" of iPads supposedly aimed at size-conscious folks who can't bear to hold the extra 2" of space and still smaller than a standard 8.5"x11" sheet of paper.

The Kindle is not a tablet...it's definitely an e-book reader and the physical size completely warrants its definition. The Kindle Fire more of a tablet but still centered around e-books. The iPad is a flat-out tablet with almost 0 concentration....it does a lot of things quite well (thanks to years/generations of Touch and iPhone feedback).

But alas, maybe Apple will create 9 different versions of the iPad just like they do of the iPod.
 
We can currently purchase an iPhone or iPod Touch, or buy the larger iPad. If TV manufacturers had followed this path, we'd have a 15" and a 55" TV from which to choose.

While not for everyone, some people actually do prefer smaller, lighter devices over larger ones. Sometimes, they are even willing to pay nearly as much for them. I'm old enough to remember when a 13" TV was not much cheaper than a larger one, but people wanted them and still bought them.

If Apple can produce an iPad mini at a reasonable cost, it's going to be very popular, especially among Kindle and Nook Tablet owners.

A new iPad mini user is going to purchase a lot of Apps and content. It's hard to see how Apple could really lose. Why must it be a one-size-fits-all option?
 
This rumor is so fake ... come on apple wouldn't do that. If Steve would turn around in his grave.
 
The smaller iPad would be great for my Wife as she's been eyeing up 7" Android tabs that she can carry in her handbag. Her uses would be reading, gaming and surfing especially on holiday.

I have the new iPad and while she likes the quality and iOS it's just simply too big and heavy for her.

Think she would go for a 7" iPad over any droid or Windows 8 Tab but size and weight are her biggest concerns.
 
A new iPad mini user is going to purchase a lot of Apps and content. It's hard to see how Apple could really lose. Why must it be a one-size-fits-all option?

I believe (and thought I saw real stats on this a year ago) that a very few percentage of the population "buy" a lot of apps.

I have purchased about 8 apps total in my 4+ years of iOS devices. Ditto for a lot of my friends. I own a handful of free apps, too.

Of course there are folks out there that will purchase dozens of apps each year...most likely, in my opinion, this audience is the 10-20 year olds who buy a lot of fun/cheesy games. But I'm not trying to rate which apps are better.

Where Apple really grows is in the volume of users...each purchasing a few apps here and there (or more)...not a community of folks buying 20+ apps every year.

As far as buying content...I'm not sure what you are referring to...Apple has stumbled since Day 1 with the iPad regarding newspapers and magazines. Even Apples iBooks does poorly. Weren't we all supposed to be reading the newspaper and our favorite book and our magazine subscriptions on the iPad by now? :) Kindle owns the e-books market. Apple should own the magazines market. Newspapers, IMO, are still doomed and will never do well in the digital world (far too much competition from a variety of news outlets, ads that annoy people, paying all those employees, etc).
 
I disagree. Apple currently offers 4" and 10" iPads (I'm going back to my points that the iPod Touch and the iPhone are essentially smaller versions of the iPad).

Adding a 7.85" in the mix, at the pricepoints theorized, is just going to muddy the waters. Think about...as a consumer you're going to see a Touch, a Phone, and 2 iPads...3 of those 4 devices sit in the $249 - $299 range. Now you create/find a comparison chart of the features. Pretty much all the same features except for sizes and the ability to make a phone call. People are not necessarily going to buy the iPad Mini. The 4" models fit in your pocket. The 10" isn't that much larger than a 7.85" inch...neither are going to fit in your pocket and maybe not even a woman's purse.

Being slightly larger here and there (and I'm sure Apple will muck around with the features, too, so they can keep their hefty margins) isn't going to attract loads of people.

As I said, the iPods (and I believe iPhones) all dropped in price as they matured. Next is Gen 4 of iPad...I think the 10" is a great size FOR A TABLET...they would be much smarter to drop the price $50-$100 (or add a lower-low end for that discount) than create a whole new "line" of iPads supposedly aimed at size-conscious folks who can't bear to hold the extra 2" of space and still smaller than a standard 8.5"x11" sheet of paper.

The Kindle is not a tablet...it's definitely an e-book reader and the physical size completely warrants its definition. The Kindle Fire more of a tablet but still centered around e-books. The iPad is a flat-out tablet with almost 0 concentration....it does a lot of things quite well (thanks to years/generations of Touch and iPhone feedback).

But alas, maybe Apple will create 9 different versions of the iPad just like they do of the iPod.

Not a big deal but the iPhone is only 3.5" and the current iPad is only 9.7" People are calling for a 4" iPhone, I don't happen to be one of them. I a good size guy and have above average size hands and having a 4" or bigger device makes one handed operation difficult, if not impossible for people with smaller hands. Also, carrying a bigger device one's pants pocket becomes more difficult / uncomfortable.

Now the current iPads are great at what they do but the majority of people that use them, after the initial "look what I can do on it period" are using them for web surfing, movies, books, games, facebook... Stuff that can easily be done on an iPhone but they're choosing to do that on the iPad. In my case, I pick up the iPad (original) because of the larger screen and battery life vs using my iPhone. When I type something it's a pain in the butt and holding onto the iPad for an hour or more gets tiresome. Based on many of the posts here, there are plenty of people that would gladly pay $299 for a 7.85" device.

It's not fair to say that it's about the same price as an iPhone and that someone would buy one over the other. They might buy one OR the other but the main solution they provide is completely different. What's most obvious is the phone part. No one is going to use a 7.85" device as their every day phone. Don't forget that the $199 for an iPhone is a subsidized price and you're locked into a voice and data contract with it. So the cost of ownership over the course of two years for my iPhone is in the ballpark of $2500. $299 < $2,500.

A smaller iPad may eat sales of the iPod Touch and I could be wrong here but haven't sales slowed down there? Maybe because there hasn't been a hardware refresh in a while but whatever the reason, I don't believe there is as much of a market for the iPod Touch if there was a $299 7.85" iPad.

There are plenty of people out there that don't want to hold an extra 2" in their hand and you shouldn't just compare this only to the Fire. There are other 7" Android devices and it just happens to be one of the most successful non iOS tablets. It does a decent job with the web surfing, movie watching, book reading, game playing and facebooking that the majority of iPad owners would want to do.

Just because you don't see yourself using one doesn't mean others wouldn't want it. Look at the responses for yourself....
 
ipad mini

I have carpal tunnel .I find that the current ipad is exactly the "wrong" size and weight for me to use.I would LOVE a smaller,lighter one.
 
Hm. I dont See the point of this size. The iPad is just perfect as it is. Can't imagine typing on a smaller screen this fast.
 
Hm. I dont See the point of this size. The iPad is just perfect as it is. Can't imagine typing on a smaller screen this fast.

That's why vendors offer choices. They want to cover the the largest swath of users. You are fine with 9.7" while the poster before you wants a smaller iPad.

Says it all doesn't it?
 
dont know about you, but personally i still dont see much point in a smaller ipad.

Here you go. I'll list my and my roommate's reasons.

Better as a book reader as it will be lighter/easier to hold.
Fits easier in places for on the go
My roommate is a pilot and the way his plane is laid out the iPad as is now is just plain too big to be of much use. He is waiting for a approximately 7" one to come out cause there is software he'd like to use with it and it will fit in the cockpit better.
 
Not going to happen. Same reason we're not going to see a different size phone. Fragmentation. Surprised people still fall for these, but every year there it is.
 
I'm Betting It Happens

Point 1: Apple is the biggest company in the world, not some niche boutique turning out a of couple products. Apple's biggest future growth market is iTunes/AppStore/iBook...and this has been clear for quite some time. The reason for this is because they don't have to create content, yet they continue to get a big chunk of profits from digital sales.

I think Apple would GIVE away iPhones and iPads if people weren't willing to buy them, just to get the profits from digital content sales.

Point 2: Amazon is selling a good number of crappy Kindles, and more importantly, getting people to use their ecosystem. Why allow this when you have 100 billion cash on hand? Why not just take a loss on the hardware and undercut Amazon? (Answer: They will, but no need to immediately as it will upset their entire product pricing schemes.)

Point 3: Another major emerging market is China, and a cheaper iPad would be great there (note the advantage of having cellular capabilities). 7.85" is better for commuters, smaller hands, etc.

Point 4: Nintendo and Sony don't know what hit them, and Microsoft has the living room. 7.85" is a great gaming console...again, for kids, they'll want it cellular.

Conclusion: Yes, I think if I can see how dumb they'd be for not doing it, you can safely assume the iPad mini is coming.
 
"hey love, I finally got you an iPad too"

A great present for us men who don't want to have to splash out for a full iPad.

Exactly haha, I been wanting to get my girl a iPad. Can't afford it tho, got her various other "cheaper" tabs, android and the play book and both are terrible. If this came out I would get her it for sure

I also know a lot of people that love the iPad but can't afford it. Im sure they would get this if it actually does come out
 
My interest in a ~7" iPad is only because it will no doubt be lighter. I would much prefer the current ~10" iPad but shave off about 0.5 lbs and get rid of the ridiculously sharp edges.

I was really sad to see that the new iPad was actually heavier than the iPad 2. The increased resolution, battery, and overall specs still make it the better device. People say it was "only a slight increase in weight", but I don't consider 8% to be a slight increase. I don't consider the 8% sales tax to be a "slight tax".
 
My interest in a ~7" iPad is only because it will no doubt be lighter. I would much prefer the current ~10" iPad but shave off about 0.5 lbs and get rid of the ridiculously sharp edges.

I was really sad to see that the new iPad was actually heavier than the iPad 2. The increased resolution, battery, and overall specs still make it the better device. People say it was "only a slight increase in weight", but I don't consider 8% to be a slight increase. I don't consider the 8% sales tax to be a "slight tax".


4G modems are power hogs (probably the retina screen as well, considering the increased pixels light has to pass through). ...And Apple didn't want to put out a product that had less battery life than its predecessor. Give it one more year and it will lighter.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.