They are taking turns in chairing and vice-chairing the Unicode emoji subcommittee, however.Apple doesn't create emojis.
They are taking turns in chairing and vice-chairing the Unicode emoji subcommittee, however.Apple doesn't create emojis.
Interesting, that’s less impact from the 16e than previous reports suggested.iPhone revenue was $46.8 billion, up 2% year over year.
😂Vision Pro getting a shoutout as well, with that product now a year old.
I wonder what they are actually measuring there. “Product not returned within the 14-day return window”?97% customer satisfaction.
They aren't. It's called "propaganda" for a reason.Nearly $25B in profit in 90 days in a “slow” quarter. Insane company.
$100B added to buyback and dividend raise. They don’t seem concerned about tariffs.
Serious question: What exactly is Silicon-Valley-speak trying to convey by being “very excited” about something?
I honestly don’t, that’s why I’m asking.That's not a serious question, you know what those words mean.
And this is why they hardly innovate and are ok with releasing half assed software and 100 new emojis each update. People will buy it regardless.
If the case ultimately goes against Apple/Google, I think it’s possible Apple could sign a multi-partner deal to promote 2 or 3 search services. It might not be as lucrative, but it could take some of the sting out.Services revenue is going to take a hit when the DOJ crashes the Google search engine referral fee.
You totally miss my point. Among the giant companies, Apple was the first to invest heavily in AI, unfortunately Steve Jobs had to put off his work right after that. After that, because the successor is lack of vision, he happily watched others quickly catching up, surpassing, and disappearing off in the front. If Apple kept Steve Jobs vision in aggressively investing in the AI, its quarterly profit would easily be double its current or more.I am going to paraphrase what Steve Jobs said years ago, for Apple to win, Google does not have to lose...
I am going to paraphrase what Steve Jobs said years ago, for Apple to win, Google does not have to lose...
No, no, no! You must preface your remarks with a toxic rant about Cook.Apple is doomed, and I am doing this correctly?
I’m not sure, but I’ve gotten plenty of market surveys from Apple over the years.I wonder what they are actually measuring there. “Product not returned within the 14-day return window”?
No one is rioting in the street while Elon is stealing everyone's private information from government databases.However, as people increasingly value privacy
Depends on what growth you're talking about. Market Capitalization end of 2021: $2.901 Trillion. Market Capitalization end of 2024: $3.863 Trillion.So no growth since end of 2021?
Hardly innovate? Their products are packed with the most advanced chips ever, and people here COMPLAIN and WHINE because they are much too powerful for their web surfing and texting needs, wishing Apple would step back and let others leapfrog them.And this is why they hardly innovate and are ok with releasing half assed software and 100 new emojis each update. People will buy it regardless.
You must have missed the call, because that has nothing to do with what I said.In case you missed the news, Apple airlifted 600 tons of iPhone from India to beat the tariff!
What you said is inaccurate. The recent higher Googl net income was a result of an $8b one time investment in a private company.Apple’s quarterly profits are now 1/3 less than Google, when it was five times 10 years ago. This is the result of missing a visionary leader, being unable to pave the way for “the next big thing” 10 years in advance.
Not sure who he is or what call he listened to, but Cook was incredibly forthcoming on detailed tariff color and disclosed how well they are managing tariffs.I didn’t listen to the call but MG Siegler thinks Tim Cook sounded off.