Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"Apple sold a record 78.3 million iPhones during the quarter, up slightly from 74.8 million a year earlier"

3.5 million more. That's "up slightly"??? if they'd sold ONE less than last year it would have been all gloom and doom and naysayers checking goat entrails for the coming apocalypse. Up slightly indeed! (And this on a phone everyone said was hardly worth upgrading to).

Yes phones are THE product in the chain that is succeeding. Yes, there needs to be diversity. But there is a flow on: people buy Macs to create Apps. I rarely upgrade iPads or Macs lately - they last longer than PCs I've had in the past (ASUS, I'm looking at you with two dead, hardly used laptops - never again!). At some stage I guess I will have to upgrade. My 2007 iMac cant get the new OS update. When it dies, after 10 long years of usage, I will happily buy another Apple product. I would like a wireless keyboard with OLED touchbar Tim if you are listening ;)
[doublepost=1485907094][/doublepost]
I hear the pipeline is awesome. :)

It seems to be a very long pipeline. They sure it's not an endless tunnel? Maybe that's why the new Campus is circular? Ideas are spinning around and around but never actually hitting the departure gate???
 
If you account for the fact that the quarter was 14 weeks instead of 13 weeks, even iPhone is down on a weekly-sales basis. Let's see the doom come back in three months when Q2 is 12 weeks instead of usual 13 and everything will be down by a lot...
 
Apple should change it's name to "Pipeline". Unfortunately, whatever they are smoking in their "pipeline" makes them hate computers.

MacOS.... the Golden Goose. iPhones/iPads... the eggs. KILL MACOS !!!! ( obviously )
 
"Apple sold a record 78.3 million iPhones during the quarter, up slightly from 74.8 million a year earlier"

3.5 million more. That's "up slightly"??? if they'd sold ONE less than last year it would have been all gloom and doom and naysayers checking goat entrails for the coming apocalypse. Up slightly indeed! (And this on a phone everyone said was hardly worth upgrading to).
3.5 million more phones is 4.68% more than last year's 74.8 million.

But here's one detail you missed: last fiscal year's Q1 only had 13 weeks. This year's Q1 had 14 weeks. That means Apple actually sold fewer iPhones per week in the quarter that just ended YOY.

You can't just look at one statistic to assess Apple's performance. That's why these earning reports have multiple metrics being reports on and the conference call brings certain things into light (like the timing of new product releases, one-time trademark dispute revenue, currency fluctuations, channel inventory and more) that aren't detailed in the balance sheet or consolidated statement of earnings.
 
3.5 million more phones is 4.68% more than last year's 74.8 million.

But here's one detail you missed: last fiscal year's Q1 only had 13 weeks. This year's Q1 had 14 weeks. That means Apple actually sold fewer iPhones per week in the quarter that just ended YOY.

You can't just look at one statistic to assess Apple's performance.

Ahh, the joys of having an accountant CEO.
 
If you account for the fact that the quarter was 14 weeks instead of 13 weeks, even iPhone is down on a weekly-sales basis. Let's see the doom come back in three months when Q2 is 12 weeks instead of usual 13 and everything will be down by a lot...

Not on a sell-through basis. On that basis iPhone units were up a tad, even accounting for the extra week and even though iPhones remained under supplied through the end of the quarter.

And Q2 will have 13 weeks just like most of Apple's quarters.
 
Thank goodness for that extra week of reporting amirite? Else your champagne might be a glass of tepid water.;)

Don't you think analysts factored in the extra week in their models? And the >$500M one-time cheque from Samsung last year? Also, check out how the dollar fared this year.

That was a solid beat, any way you look at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jax44
Why should they give anything back? Don't buy their products if you don't like their style. And you gotta admit it's a great one trick pony.

Well they could of not increased prices, not like they couldn't afford to.. or how about giving the iPhone more like a higher res screen in the 4.7" model, give more back by adding more features, not take them away as well. It's an alright one trick pony... just didn't like that iPhone 7 camera... iOS 10 has really really really not been my favorite either! Theirs something to use some of that obscene cash on, fix iOS? That's giving something back. Or release a better version in the first place.

Meh let's see what this years one is like.. will I be keeping my 6S? Really can't buy and sell another two iPhones.
 
Not sure if anyone posted this yet.....but Apple is way to reliant on the iPhone. They keep killing products (Mac Pro, their routers and time capsules) and making their other products very limited (4 damn ports on a $2500 laptop...) imagine if Apple had bad luck like samsung did and had recall all of those 78 million iPhones....because of a bad battery. imagine the reverse karma of those unleashed on those Apple techs having to remove those batteries that are glued to the inside of the phone....lol
 
Not sure if anyone posted this yet.....but Apple is way to reliant on the iPhone. They keep killing products (Mac Pro, their routers and time capsules) and making their other products very limited (4 damn ports on a $2500 laptop...) imagine if Apple had bad luck like samsung did and had recall all of those 78 million iPhones....because of a bad battery. imagine the reverse karma of those unleashed on those Apple techs having to remove those batteries that are glued to the inside of the phone....lol

But they have had 6S battery issues, Plus models bending and then faults developing with their screens. Loads of issues with the iPhone but they keep selling. Because Andoid just isn't as slick for Jo Bloggs, although Android has the dominant market share by far,
 
Let me tell you now.

New macOS, pretty much no new features. Maybe finally iOS app simulation.

New iOS, pretty much no new features. Maybe more iMessage emoji's.

That's it, a great day.

Would be amazing if Apple opened up every private API so people could actually make innovative apps for iOS. I mean....if they are implemented in a nefarious way Apple can see that in the code and reject it from the app store....
 
Nice increase for the Mac, seems like Macbook Pros sold decently

Yes, and the new MBP weren't introduced until October 27 so, when you consider that it only affected a portion of the quarter, it didn't have maximum impact.
To those whining about 9%, you have to consider the total. That's still a helluva lot of revenue on 5.4 million units. Silly boys and girls, the Mac is not dead by a long shot. It will get another shot in the arm with the new iMacs this year. Regardless, Mac sales as a percentage may decline further when you consider how big the iPhone number will be with a new super premium 10th anniversary iPhone.
But go ahead and promote your tired narrative about Apple and it's neglect, lack of innovation, lack of great products.
It's all BS. Don't like the new MBP? Fine, scurry off to get an incredibly craptastic Surface. Now, there's product that represents a sizable portion of a Microsoft's revenue....
 
If that level of detail was that critical to investors, the SEC would have regulations that would make corporate disclosure far closer to that level of detail.

Let's face it: it's not invaluable to an investor. Let's say the wholesale price of the Bluetooth chip in an iPod touch goes up $0.02. Is that going to make or break Apple? Is that information "invaluable to an investor" [sic]? No, it is not.

So you're saying that an investor privy to Apple's financial details down to the penny wouldn't have a competitive advantage over their competition? No sane investor is going to turn down better information.

Take the Apple Watch for example. We barely know anything - R&D spending, revenue, margin, sales distribution, manufacturing cost. Sure it's pennies on the dollar for Apple, but it's the only new hardware category developed under Cook's tenure. Detailed knowledge of it's performance could have an outsized effect of Apple's share price, especially for long-term investors. Tim knows it's a risky product, so he hid it in the balance sheet. Why would he keep that information under lock-and-key if it weren't valuable?
 
Does the revenue breakdown imply that the iPad is a MUCH higher cost-to-value proposition for the consumer? Dangerous reliance on a single product.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.