In 2017, customers in India bought:
- 127 million smartphones
- 164 million feature phones
In other words, the majority of consumers in India still aren't ready for a smartphone, much less premium smartphones from Apple.
Your conclusion has no relationship with the data presented . Your data shows that annual smartphone sales exceed the populations of most of the worlds countries. About a quarter of that is high end smartphones . About 30m high end smartphones a year is more than several European countries’ populations combined .
Take it from someone who’s actually lived there and visits there multiple times a year (me) - Apples problem isn’t the price as much as the poor sales network, after sales support, local iOS ecosystem - all of which Android is much superior at .
People pick Android by CHOICE - my dad declined a 6 plus as a gift, preferring a Nexus instead .
[doublepost=1531936280][/doublepost]
All the
evidence says otherwise.
The premium smartphone market (>INR 30,000, US$ 452) contributes to 4% of the overall smartphone market in India, still in the nascent stages as the overall smartphone user base is still less mature.
Worldwide, premium smartphones represent about 20% of shipments.
You're again wrong. You are using price of the phone as a proxy for premium character, which should be defined by feature set. There are quite a few premium smartphones that don't cost $450. The entire Xiaomi range goes for half of the Rs.30K threshold listed, and those have Snapdragon 636s that are comparable to the A9 chipset in the iPhone 6S range.
It is a fact that $900+ for an Apple phone is way overpriced for what it offers as value. Americans may be willing to pay it (heck, I'm one, and have a 7+) but in India you get laughed at when you can get a similar feature set AND a more usable ecosystem under Android for far less.
Anyone thinking the vast majority of smartphones in India are clunky ancient hand me downs that barely get the job done, has clearly not been to India recently. Go to any Indian urban area - small, medium or large, and you'll see pretty much everyone around you carrying smartphones.
Using phone prices as proxy for premium nature is a very bad idea - particularly because you can get quite a large selection of great smartphones for much less in India. It's more a testament to the US market lacking the depth of price to value, that the US notion of a premium phone is something north of $750, when you can get similar phones for a third of that in India, and in any case, the BOM of that iPhone is probably $200-250 too.
[doublepost=1531936973][/doublepost]
OK. Ignore the data.
Your hand waving arguments are convincing nobody.
With respect, you simply don't understand the data you present. You're simply confusing price for premium character. Here's the reality:
* India smartphone userbase exceeds the population of US, and annual sales exceed smartphone sales in US.
* Android ecosystem in India is far better than iOS, and that's from someone like me who has never used Android and instead uses an iPhone, iPad and Mac in US, but would never do so in India.
* Apple India sales network sucks. After sales sucks. iOS ecosystem in India is weak. iPhone prices are laughably out of sync with competition.
* For ~$200 you can get a Xiaomi cellphone with with the same generation feature set as an iPhone 6S/7 generation.
* By setting your premium threshold at more than 2x that level, you're not measuring anything useful as far as technical specifications of the phones go.