I work for a law firm that practices, among other things employment law. We are also very risk averse when it comes to things like this, always erring on the side of avoiding litigation. Incidentally, my firm is also very humane and employee friendly, generally speaking.
Our policy for hourly workers is that they are to be at their desks, logged in and ready to work when their "shift" starts. I would imagine that our HR department would not mandate this if there were a precedent that would expose the company to risk. Incidentally, the company is very, very sensitive to hourly employees working from home, as they do not want to risk getting in trouble for not paying employees for their time.
My point to all of this is that I do not believe my company would have their policy the way it is were it not already established in common law. But this should be interesting, because I could see a jury being convinced to find in favor of the plaintiffs if the case law was murky.
Our policy for hourly workers is that they are to be at their desks, logged in and ready to work when their "shift" starts. I would imagine that our HR department would not mandate this if there were a precedent that would expose the company to risk. Incidentally, the company is very, very sensitive to hourly employees working from home, as they do not want to risk getting in trouble for not paying employees for their time.
My point to all of this is that I do not believe my company would have their policy the way it is were it not already established in common law. But this should be interesting, because I could see a jury being convinced to find in favor of the plaintiffs if the case law was murky.