If the law is so clear, then why was a similar class action claim for unpaid time waiting for your computer to boot up before you can clock in denied?
As if the need to bring a bag into work or not is germane to the what the law states (or does not state).
And then the employees who don't bring bags will sue because they are forced to work 5 more minutes than the ones with the bags but get paid the same amount.
They would claim that they get to have 5 minutes break in lieu of bag check.
Then the bag check people would claim they are being denied a 5 minute break that non-bag carriers get.
Not the specific text of the law, but the facts of the case, perhaps. We don't really have many facts yet, just a "he said...." The complaint doesn't state that employees pat downs before leaving are at issue, only bag searches, so bags could very will be central to the case. We need more facts. Complaints only state which part of the law the plaintiff finds the defendant breached among other legal requirements.
Actually there has been several cases that have stated that booting up your work computer counts as compensable work
http://www.wagehourinsights.com/off-the-clock/starting-computers-and-reading-e-mail-may-be-compensable-work/
No - what I mean is the whole silly notion that an employee doesn't NEED to bring a bag to work. Not germane to whatever law is being questioned. The issue isn't whether or not someone should be able to bring a bag into work or not. The issue is the security screening and paid wages. It's not about the right or need to bring something into the store as an employee.
Yeah, but you were ALREADY clocked in while your employer's computers were taking soooo long to boot up. You were getting paid while you waited for your computer to boot up.
I'm pretty a lot big companies do this not just retailers. I've seen UPS and FedEx check their driver's bags at the end of the shift. Hell they have metal detectors and X-ray machines!
Seems like if the employer is making an accommodation for the employee's personal convenience, it would be relevant to the discussion.
For example, "We don't want you to bring a bag to work. But if you want to, you will need to go through a security check after you clock out."
Seems like if the employer is making an accommodation for the employee's personal convenience, it would be relevant to the discussion.
For example, "We don't want you to bring a bag to work. But if you want to, you will need to go through a security check after you clock out."
If you cannot (or will not without complaining and suing later) to the contract you signed when joining the team, do not sign it and find a different job.
kinda true.
there is no need to bring in bags to be checked.
if that is the policy, then don't do it. and you are not working while waiting so no payment needed.
Though when i worked at a low-wage place i didn't need to take breaks throughout the day. some would take more smoke breaks and stay outside the building. if i wanted a break, it would be when the customer base was slow. I stayed in the store...sure i was "working" but since there wasn't a customer i wasn't really working. then after a bit i would clean or something if still no customer. if you have time to lean you have time to clean.
Oh please! Employees should not be bringing personal belongings like backpacks into the store. If you do, those items will get searched on your own time because YOU brought them in. If you don't want your bags searched on your time, don't bring backpacks to work!
This is such utter, complete nonsense.
lol... getting paid while waiting for the time machine to turn on? You, sir, must have never worked in an office environment...
Unless you're senior staff you're not getting paid salary, you need to clock in using the secure office web page, and the computer will never be on when you get there... Ever tried to clock in while waiting for a G3 to turn on? ...Better get to work 5 minutes earlier then your already expected 10 minute-early-to-work policy so that you're "ready to work" when you clock in.
All that said - this lawsuit is a joke. This is just another case of our lazy generation feeling entitled to things that no body in their right minds 50, 100, 500 years ago would expect. If you're reading this lawsuit and you even remotely think that the employees should be paid damages for being required to stay a little longer after work you're part of the problem.
If you cannot (or will not without complaining and suing later) to the contract you signed when joining the team, do not sign it and find a different job.
If the law is so clear, then why was a similar class action claim for unpaid time waiting for your computer to boot up before you can clock in denied?
No - what I mean is the whole silly notion that an employee doesn't NEED to bring a bag to work. Not germane to whatever law is being questioned. The issue isn't whether or not someone should be able to bring a bag into work or not. The issue is the security screening and paid wages. It's not about the right or need to bring something into the store as an employee.
So you know what (if any) contract these employees signed?
Do you believe that employees don't have any rights to defend themselves if their employers are breaking a law which affects them? Fact is - you and I both don't know the details. But unlike you, I give the same benefit of the doubt to both Apple AND the Employees. That doesn't make ME part of the problem.
I would argue that you - and those with such Apathy towards employees are part of the problem.
Pleeeese. How many bathrooms breaks do you take while you're on the clock? Maybe Apple should ask for those millions back? Wanna go tit for tat? Sounds like sour grapes to me.
When I worked at Apple, it would be another manager, or the next level associate below them. I've done it a few times.
I worked there for 13 months. That's $2.875 per check, usually 2 per day, roughly 5 days a week ($28.75) for 13 months $373.75. So do we get taxed fed/state from that time of employment or now? Because my tax bracket went up at least 1-2 levels.
Excuse me. It's my business if I want to bring my bag to work and no one can legally prohibit me from doing so. These searches were done during lunch period (unlawful) and after the shift already ended (I believe unlawful but potentially debatable). Maybe you're part of the problem for why our middle class is dying and the corporations are running away with all the money while there are no jobs to even go around. I don't understand why anyone on this forum (I presume predominantly middle class) is on Apple's side when these are precisely the types of corporate practices that are extorting you for your wages.
The bold has been said repeatedly in this thread, not sure why. You should understand that a part time retail job does not really put you in the middle class. $15/hr part time is likely under $25k/yr. $18/hr is under $30k. Middle class is more like...double that.Excuse me. It's my business if I want to bring my bag to work and no one can legally prohibit me from doing so. These searches were done during lunch period (unlawful) and after the shift already ended (I believe unlawful but potentially debatable). Maybe you're part of the problem for why our middle class is dying and the corporations are running away with all the money while there are no jobs to even go around. I don't understand why anyone on this forum (I presume predominantly middle class) is on Apple's side when these are precisely the types of corporate practices that are extorting you for your wages.