As others have pointed out here, it always amuses me how people suddenly hate the electoral college when their candidate loses. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
Can you please explain how an app can be a terrorist?Using your own hyperbole:
To be fair, our president is only blocking apps from countries that cultivate malware, not all brown apps. Else why are Saudi Arabians and folks from other Muslim countries still allowed in?
Once a better app approval process is implemented, then all apps will be allowed back in the country. The ban will be be lifted in four months.
So it's really not such an unsound executive order when you break it down.![]()
The poster that I was replying to was referring to Muslims as brown apps and I was just using the same hyperbole. I don't actually think that apps are terrorists or vice versa. Ha!Can you please explain how an app can be a terrorist?
Also, the Saudi Arabian apps should be blocked IMO, they're the bad guys not Iran, Iraq or Syria! Look at facts. However, I know POTUS want to block them too but he can't at least for now as he's doing business there.
Fair enough.The poster that I was replying to was referring to Muslims as brown apps and I was just using the same hyperbole. I don't actually think that apps are terrorists or vice versa. Ha!
As for the actual hard data that went into determining the countries on the banned list, I honestly don't know and won't act like I do. But I'd imagine there's some thought behind it for sure.
Very interesting stats. Unfortunately those numbers don't quite dig into the heart of the issue Trump is supposedly helping solve. He's trying to block entry from countries from which there is a high occupation of ISIS members, and thus high-risk to our citizens.
As others have pointed out here, it always amuses me how people suddenly hate the electoral college when their candidate loses. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
Yeah it's not 1776 anymore, and there's never been a more dangerous argument than "we've always done it this way"Maybe you're just trolling but I'm so tired of seeing this nonsensical description of the voting process of our Republic. Working as intended by our Founders, by the way, despite massive attempts to interfere with that process with such things as the 17th amendment for instance.
It isn't that the rural areas are more important, it's that no area is more important. Check a county by county election result map if you're interested in an example of the need for such a system. If you're being reasonable and open to discussion you'll begin to understand the wisdom of our republican form of government as established by our early political figures. To prevent the drowning out of less populated areas of our nation by those with huge urban centers. Hence the two houses of Congress. One for the people, one for the states, the Senate, where all states are EQUAL. The 17th has done much to damage that balance and a return to the original intent would go a long way to reestablishing order.
Our Founders, Jefferson in particular, were extremely wary of large urban centers and the havoc they eventually wreck on governments and the citizens of a nation through corruption. They were coming from Europe where such evil was visited daily on its citizenry by pompous, arrogant, aristocracy and monarchies. Disdainful of those they deemed unenlightened and beneath them. You know the type, right? Cheeto loving peasants.
Things have not changed all that much. People are still stupid and self centered and given a choice between being self sufficient or have the government take care of everything, people lean toward government assistance because it's easier. The founding fathers understood this basic human flaw and tried their best to avoid it. The electoral college is just as important today as it ever was. It keeps our republic from slipping back to where it shouldn't be.Yeah it's not 1776 anymore, and there's never been a more dangerous argument than "we've always done it this way"