This is exactly what I got from the article.Change your password often.
If iCloud backup was turned off in settings how does Apple get that data?
...So security is gone, done. What the hell digital equipment would a Govt. employee even use?
This isn't about getting into the phone it's about the iCloud backups.Maybe I'm confused - and I probably am having read it quickly. But if Apple could have helped them before the password change but won't after - really - what's the difference. Not that I'm saying that Apple should help the FBI. But how genuine is their statement? You're either going to break into someone's phone or not. What difference does it make if the password has been changed?
What's on the phone that wouldn't be in the backups?
ITS ONLY ONE PHONE, HOW MANY DIED... SMARTEN UP.... DON'T GET STUPID ON USour government wants to roll back encryption and auto-wipe features so that only leaders and government employees can use them. i guess they're much, much stupider than i even imagined. the streissand effect don't got nothin on this.
This isn't about getting into the phone it's about the iCloud backups.
Conclusion: Don't use Apple's iCloud backups! Backup only locally to an encrypted Mac![]()
So, we know Apple cooperated with the FBI in the days following the attack. It was reportedly just iCloud backups that was handed over but now that the password was changed, the plan they had wasn't going to work. The plan was to have the phone connect to a known wifi network and connected to a charger so it could create a backup automatically, as it should. The the FBI could request the backup data without unlocking the phone. BUT, like I said, the password was changed. So now you HAVE TO unlock the phone and input the new password for the Apple ID before you can create a backup again. But that's the problem, we don't know the passcode.Maybe I'm confused - and I probably am having read it quickly. But if Apple could have helped them before the password change but won't after - really - what's the difference. Not that I'm saying that Apple should help the FBI. But how genuine is their statement? You're either going to break into someone's phone or not. What difference does it make if the password has been changed?
ITS ONLY ONE PHONE, HOW MANY DIED... SMARTEN UP.... DON'T GET STUPID ON US
According to Guardian reporter Danny Yardon Apple says no other country has asked it to do what the DOJ/FBI is seeking.
What apple is saying is if the password hadn't been changed they could have connected to a known wifi network and a backup would automatically have happened. My question is, if this guy turned off iCloud backup in settings what would they have been able to retrieve?Well my question really still stands. What difference does changing the password make. If they're going to break into the account, they're going to break into the account.
So, we know Apple cooperated with the FBI in the days following the attack. It was reportedly just iCloud backups that was handed over but now that the password was changed, the plan they had wasn't going to work. The plan was to have the phone connect to a known wifi network and connected to a charger so it could create a backup automatically, as it should. The the FBI could request the backup data without unlocking the phone. BUT, like I said, the password was changed. So now you HAVE TO unlock the phone and input the new password for the Apple ID before you can create a backup again. But that's the problem, we don't know the passcode.![]()
Serious question: does the iTunes backup password interface have the same brute force decryption prevention methods that iOS has baked in that are the problem here?
No, it doesn't seem so. I've tried more than 10 times before. I had forgotten my password and it didn't lock me out. However, using brute force attacks on the iTunes encrypted backup password could take forever since its alphanumeric.Serious question: does the iTunes backup password interface have the same brute force decryption prevention methods that iOS has baked in that are the problem here?
But again- obtaining access to the data - whether on the phone or in the cloud - what does it matter? Clearly I'm missing something. I'm not advocating for a breach of privacy. But it seems that if there's already a breach or a breach is "approved" - then it really doesn't matter how the information is then obtained?What apple is saying is if the password hadn't been changed they could have connected to a known wifi network and a backup would automatically have happened. My question is, if this guy turned off iCloud backup in settings what would they have been able to retrieve?
Made me wonder what if Tim was not the CEO, since a lot of people asking him to step down.
Okey, what if Steve was here, what Steve could do?
They're not breaking into the phone though. This is the Apple ID password, not the pin code to get into the device itself.Again - and not trying to sound obtuse. If you're breaking into the phone/accessing data that isn't yours - what's really the difference in method?
If iCloud backup was turned off in settings how does Apple get that data?
According to Guardian reporter Danny Yardon Apple says no other country has asked it to do what the DOJ/FBI is seeking.
Well my question really still stands. What difference does changing the password make. If they're going to break into the account, they're going to break into the account.