Heh. I got a warning from a mod for replying with just an eye roll emoji. Did you?
Heh. I got a warning from a mod for replying with just an eye roll emoji. Did you?
Heh. I got a warning from a mod for replying with just an eye roll emoji. Did you?
Sorry for the late reply.Let's take a step back and look at the bigger picture beyond just iOS and the App Store?
Either these existing entities collectively—or a new dedicated entity like the one I mentioned earlier—could regulate software companies that develop and license mobile operating systems and app marketplaces, ensuring fair governance when it comes to content restrictions and censorship.
No worries - thanks for sharing your political stance.Sorry for the late reply.
On political spectrum I find myself inclined towards Libertarianism. So I’m not a fan of big government, more bureaucracy, more government departments at all.
Also I lose my interest in a discussion where one participant doesn’t even answer simple questions.
Thanks.
LM. A. O.Can’t be apples property if they can’t use it as they see fit.
Amazing. You flip flopped in the next sentence.(Within the law of course).
So you are arguing a contradiction.
Was it, though?Problem solved today, by Apple, by correcting their approval verbiage
That app is not an apple product...Was it, though?
I mean...products can be Apple-approved without "being ready" for distribution, can't they?
Absolutely not 😳 re-read thatadults should be allowed to enjoy what they want
Will somebody please tell me what this "more government" thing is. What units do we measure it in? Why are consumer protections "big government"? What do they have to do with "government" beyond being a law?On political spectrum I find myself inclined towards Libertarianism. So I’m not a fan of big government, more bureaucracy, more government departments at all.