There's like 30 years of industry marketing pointing out that "PC" is the shorthand term to mean an IBM PC 5150 Compatible computer (the good old clone industry spawned by Compaq or an IBM machine that is "IBM Compatible-PC").
Apple would have no problems proving in court that they never built a Mac around the PC architecture and that even the Intel Macs require special software to install PC compatible OSes (Bootcamp).
You just wish it could be easily thwarted, for some obscure reason that evades me (facts much ?).
I'm sorry, I guess you've just not had a lot of experience in such matters. Just because many people have become accustomed to calling a windows based pc a PC, and calling an apple computer a mac doesn't make the make any less a PC.
Their written claim was a PC a mac is by the base definition (non-biased definitions) a PC.
As defined by Wikipedia:
"A personal computer (PC) is any general-purpose computer whose size, capabilities, and original sales price make it useful for individuals, and which is intended to be operated directly by an end-user with no intervening computer operator. This contrasted with the batch processing or time-sharing models which allowed larger, more expensive minicomputer and mainframe systems to be used by many people, usually at the same time. Large data processing systems require a full-time staff to operate efficiently."
A PC is defined by it's use, by it's price, not by it's operating system. Names also vary regionally as well as legal policies.
The claim as it was written before could not be legally defended. Hence why Apple changed it. I agree with Apples legal team who decided to change the message as it could not be defended, especially after recent events.
You just wish it could be easily thwarted, for some obscure reason that evades me (facts much ?).
I'm not sure what you mean, I'm just agreeing with Apples decision, legally that statement is high risk. If it wasn't, Apple would not have changed it. A PC by definition across the globe is a computer designed for personal use, as opposed to server type usage.
Maybe to some people they may believe a mac is not a PC, but that doesn't mean that much in the eyes of the laws, and I do mean laws. Laws across the globe vary greatly, rulings may vary in different locations, with such a risky statement it is highly likely that even IF they managed to win the legal battle in one or two countries they would still very likely lose in others.
Take not of Australian consumer protection laws which are rather harsh against false product claims.
Apple could try and argue it, but once the dictionaries come out, they have lost.
I know this, Apple know this, and has made the appropriate changes. Only you don't seem to realise/know this, and for some strange reason keep fighting it instead of waking up and realising the truth.