"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
I haven't seen any "toxic" comments here. Though I see a LOT of disappointment from Apple fans towards Apple's highly questionable UX decision making. That is LEGITIMATE criticism. If you can't handle that, snowflake, then you might want to stop visiting
BETA forums.
Liquid Glass, for anyone who has been a student of user interface design, as I have been for 45 years, does so many things 'wrong' according to the 'science' of the field that it is 100% on Apple to explain themselves for reversing nearly 50 years of what came before. Change for change's sake is
not how things are done, not by 'experts'; which is the primary cause of consternation about this… maybe Apple's 'experts' are no such thing any longer. Because they're making novice mistakes.
And don't even start with the "if you don't like it, buy Windows" nonsense, that's a red herring argument. Just because Microsoft leads a few million lemmings off a cliff, it doesn't follow that if I don't want to go off a cliff, and I think Apple is headed for a cliff, that I need to get in the Microsoft line to really understand going over a cliff. No, I have higher expectations for a 3+ trillion dollar company that I helped reach that point, that constantly states they hold themselves to higher expectations. Liquid Glass is a UI/UX disaster that flies in the face of 50 years of Human Interface Design; I (and others) clearly expect better from Apple, one of the foundational progenitors
of Human Interface Design. That's not "toxic", that's "accountability".