Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am having an issue with Photos with the new beta. It keeps connecting and then disconnecting to iCloud. In the left-hand pane where it lists my 'Shared' albums and photos, these keep appearing and then reappearing. It also indicates that is has 1,380 pictures to upload when my entire library only has 864. In looking at my CPU activity and network activity, it looks like every second it taps the network and the CPU spikes. I also can't select the 'Pause for One Day' option in Photos preferences.
 
Anyone have any idea why Safari doesn't show anything for embedded Youtube videos. No extensions installed. Hasn't happened before.
 
With this new build, I seem to be getting Wikipedia results via look-up on one of my Macs, but no the other.

On the one that works, the look-up window has tabs at the bottom where I can choose Wikipedia. On the one that doesn't, I simply get a dictionary definition and a link to open the Dictionary app.

Does anyone else have this issue? Not sure how this can be addressed.

Thanks.
 
The Yosemite 10.10.3 beta is...

Crap! I've downloaded all of them only to revert back to the 10.10.2 very quickly. I've done the AppleSeed for both Mavericks and Yosemite and this is the only one that I've had such huge issues with! Especially Photos! I don't expect photos to be an easy transition and frankly it's too simple! I wish they'd do something that was more in between iPhoto and Aperture, but we know Apple has gone cowering back to the easy life of pleasing the home user and leaving the real apps to the big boys. Such a shame too. I was really having high hopes for Apple too!
 
Crap! I've downloaded all of them only to revert back to the 10.10.2 very quickly. I've done the AppleSeed for both Mavericks and Yosemite and this is the only one that I've had such huge issues with! Especially Photos! I don't expect photos to be an easy transition and frankly it's too simple! I wish they'd do something that was more in between iPhoto and Aperture, but we know Apple has gone cowering back to the easy life of pleasing the home user and leaving the real apps to the big boys. Such a shame too. I was really having high hopes for Apple too!

Having used both Aperture and iPhoto extensively since 2008, I feel that Photos really does slot in pretty much between Aperture and iPhoto, and once 3rd parties begin to produce Extensions, a lot of what may have originally been lacking could be reintroduced. It's a brilliant model actually - Apple creates the shell of the app, which covers organization, important controls and features, and sharing FOR FREE, then 3rd parties can create additional functionality that can be sold on as as-needed basis. Want to brush in adjustments? Buy an extension. Want to do more to your metadata and GPS location? Buy an extension. You can make your version of Photos as streamlined or complex as you need it to be.

A lot of the editing controls are hidden by default, and it requires you to use folders and Albums structure differently if you liked to compartmentalize your shoots by events. However, I have found that the Moments works well enough that I rarely need to create additional albums. The thing I miss most from Aperture is the ability to brush adjustments in, or apply adjustments to just midtones, highlights, etc.

A feature that I thought I would get in use out of but can now say otherwise is iCloud shared Albums. My family and I went to Comicon this past weekend armed with 4 iPhones, a Nikon DSLR and a Fuji mirrorless. After such an event, we typically email our best shots around to each other as some like them for their social media, others for albums/projects, others to print. It's a mess sharing all these shots with this many cameras. For this event we used the shared Album functionality. The iPhoneographers made their edits on their iPhones or iPads, and my son and I added our shots to Photos on our respective Macs and made our edits there. When we were all finished, we all just dragged out best shots into a Comicon iCloud shared album, and these were instantly available to everyone on all of their respective devices. No sharing of iCloud accounts, no sharing of libraries, no emailing images or putting them on memory sticks - they just showed up. I can see using this quite a bit.
 
Any and all I encounter at home, work, internet cafes ... so scientifically the idea that it is NOT the router's fault is fairly well supported by evidence. Plus all these same routers I encounter work fine with Windows 7 and Linux Centos and Fedora.

so you think this is a universal problem that everybody with Yosemite would have in these spots? Or could it be your set up?
 
Having used both Aperture and iPhoto extensively since 2008, I feel that Photos really does slot in pretty much between Aperture and iPhoto, and once 3rd parties begin to produce Extensions, a lot of what may have originally been lacking could be reintroduced. It's a brilliant model actually - Apple creates the shell of the app, which covers organization, important controls and features, and sharing FOR FREE, then 3rd parties can create additional functionality that can be sold on as as-needed basis. Want to brush in adjustments? Buy an extension. Want to do more to your metadata and GPS location? Buy an extension. You can make your version of Photos as streamlined or complex as you need it to be.

A lot of the editing controls are hidden by default, and it requires you to use folders and Albums structure differently if you liked to compartmentalize your shoots by events. However, I have found that the Moments works well enough that I rarely need to create additional albums. The thing I miss most from Aperture is the ability to brush adjustments in, or apply adjustments to just midtones, highlights, etc.

A feature that I thought I would get in use out of but can now say otherwise is iCloud shared Albums. My family and I went to Comicon this past weekend armed with 4 iPhones, a Nikon DSLR and a Fuji mirrorless. After such an event, we typically email our best shots around to each other as some like them for their social media, others for albums/projects, others to print. It's a mess sharing all these shots with this many cameras. For this event we used the shared Album functionality. The iPhoneographers made their edits on their iPhones or iPads, and my son and I added our shots to Photos on our respective Macs and made our edits there. When we were all finished, we all just dragged out best shots into a Comicon iCloud shared album, and these were instantly available to everyone on all of their respective devices. No sharing of iCloud accounts, no sharing of libraries, no emailing images or putting them on memory sticks - they just showed up. I can see using this quite a bit.

I hope you're right regarding the extensions, however it seems the actual library management is still going to be up to Apple and it's not as flexible as Aperture was.

Since I've converted to Lightroom I'm still trying to figure out what my workflow will be (hobbyist, not professional).

I don't want ALL my photos on iCloud Photo Library, so basically here's what I've been doing:

1) All iOS photos get managed by iCloud photo library (this is working rather well now)

2) All my digital camera RAW files get processed in Lightroom, and the best ones get published to iPhoto shared photo streams- which is kind of a clumsy process right now that involves multiple steps. Also uploaded to Flickr.

So basically I let Lightroom manage my digital assets and use Photos/iCloud as a publishing endpoint for finished photos, along with Flickr.

What I'm hoping for is a direct Photos publishing endpoint within Lightroom-- that will save some steps for sure. Right now I have to export JPG's and then import those into Aperture, and then publish them into a shared photo stream. I haven't actually tried that workflow with Photos yet.

One thing I am NOT going to do is convert my existing Aperture library. I don't want all those RAW files sucking up iCloud space-- so I'm just going to pick specific albums to import into my iCloud library, JPG only. The rest will just be dumped into my Lightroom catalog (though I'll lose my edits).


Anybody else have a RAW processing workflow for Photos involving an external editor?
 
I don't want ALL my photos on iCloud Photo Library, so basically here's what I've been doing:

1) All iOS photos get managed by iCloud photo library (this is working rather well now)

2) All my digital camera RAW files get processed in Lightroom, and the best ones get published to iPhoto shared photo streams- which is kind of a clumsy process right now that involves multiple steps. Also uploaded to Flickr.

One way to control what gets uploaded into iCloud is to manage your Photos library as hybrid 'Managed' and 'Referenced'. Managed images get uploaded to iCloud; Referenced images do not. My non-iOS workflow consists of copying my new image "masters" into my existing folder structure for all of my images (my old Aperture Masters basically). Once copied into my folder hierarchy on my external drive, I import all of them into Photos as 'Referenced'. You can select this option in Photos Preferences. I then cull, sort, and edit the ones I want to work on. Once I've done that, I ONLY 'consolidate' the ones into Photos that I want to go into iCloud; these become 'Managed' in Photos. The remaining ones remain as referenced. So Photos become my editor for all my images, and I only consolidate the ones I want to go into iCloud; the rest stay as Referenced.
 
Keyboard bug, where the keyboard on some Mac Books is still present, even more persistent now on my 2014 Mac Book Air.:mad:

The keyboard bug should have been fixed by now.

I also get intermittent WIFI issues, plus with the latest beta, the Speedtest results are considerably lower than they were before.

Overall, a total fail of an update. :apple:
 
Help with Photos

hi, is anyone having issue with Photos after repairing the library because of Faces problem (photos not showing up when click on faces)?

I repaired my library because I have that problem and it fixed the Faces issue. However, I noticed that the Photos.app start uploading my library all over again (I have around 1800 photos and videos) but showing no progress. It stays there.

Also, it broke my iCloud Photo Sharing. On the 'Shared' tabs it says 'Connecting to Library... Retrieving latest photo sharing activity' and not showing the photos I've been sharing. If I turn off iCloud Photo Library, however, it shows the photos I've been sharing with my friends & family without problem.

I've looked up on the icloud.com, the photos I took yesterday using my iPhone have been uploaded as My Photo Stream, and I imported them manually on my Mac to add them on my existing albums. However, the photos didn't show up on the albums on my iPhone because Photos.app from Mac apparently isn't working properly (not uploading photos, not syncing).

Does anyone have this issue and successfully resolve it? Thank you.
 
hi, is anyone having issue with Photos after repairing the library because of Faces problem (photos not showing up when click on faces)?

I repaired my library because I have that problem and it fixed the Faces issue. However, I noticed that the Photos.app start uploading my library all over again (I have around 1800 photos and videos) but showing no progress. It stays there.

Also, it broke my iCloud Photo Sharing. On the 'Shared' tabs it says 'Connecting to Library... Retrieving latest photo sharing activity' and not showing the photos I've been sharing. If I turn off iCloud Photo Library, however, it shows the photos I've been sharing with my friends & family without problem.

I've looked up on the icloud.com, the photos I took yesterday using my iPhone have been uploaded as My Photo Stream, and I imported them manually on my Mac to add them on my existing albums. However, the photos didn't show up on the albums on my iPhone because Photos.app from Mac apparently isn't working properly (not uploading photos, not syncing).

Does anyone have this issue and successfully resolve it? Thank you.
Same problem, no luck finding a fix yet.
 
Former fruit company employee (engineer)

Most of the time there are hundreds of bug fixes both UI and Framework fixes that get put into these updates. WAYYYY to many to list in the release notes. Also most are dumb mistakes they dont want you to know about. Those mistakes mostly being dumb UI mistakes. There are so many engineers that love to point out dumb UI mistakes when seeded internally before WWDC or beta releases. Most of time they get in a status of NMOS/P4 (Next Major OS/ Priority 4) however if enough people(engineers that have access to bleeding edge releases) complain then the bug screener will dig it up send to QA to verify, get it fixed and release it in a beta internally (pre-WWDC) or beta to devs (post-WWDC) these fixes stuff hardly EVER make release notes.
 
Last edited:
Hi - quick question, sorry if it's been asked elsewhere already - are you able to sort photos manually in the new app? Cheers
 
mouse icon bug

I seriously wish they would fix the stupid bug where the mouse icon is wrong half the time (I-beam over traffic lights, etc). This bug has been there since Mavericks.
 
I seriously wish they would fix the stupid bug where the mouse icon is wrong half the time (I-beam over traffic lights, etc). This bug has been there since Mavericks.

Did you do a clean install? I've never seen that bug anywhere.
 
Last edited:
Did you do a clean install? I've ever seen that bug anywhere.
It is easily reproducible on every Mac with Mavericks or Yosemite, including brand new ones in the Apple store. It happens very frequently, especially in Apple apps like Safari or Mail.

A simple way to reproduce it:

Open a Safari window, move mouse to address bar. Click to bring the focus to the address bar. Click and hold mouse button (icon changes to I-beam) while moving due left. Release mouse button once you are in the grey area.

It is expected that the mouse button changes back to pointer when mouse button is released outside of the address bar area. Instead it remains the I-beam. You can move to the window control traffic lights and the icon remains the I-beam.
 
I seriously hope the enhancements to emojis is the joke part part of the update.
I've been having so many countless problems, lags, slowdowns, UI glitches and battery drains since yosemite (clean install on top-en mid2014 rMBP15"), I sincerely hope all their taskforce isn't going into stupid smiley redesign...

i wholeheartedly agree. i couldn't care less about emojis and other useless features; i simply want Apple to FIX the numerous-serious bugs in Yosemite, especially the horrible lags & glitches with the UI. Apple engineers seem to be more concerned, obsessed really, with jamming new-unnecessary features down our throats, than they are with writing reliable-stable code. Yosemite has been the worst, most frustrating, MacOS release ever, ime.
 
It is easily reproducible on every Mac with Mavericks or Yosemite, including brand new ones in the Apple store. It happens very frequently, especially in Apple apps like Safari or Mail.

A simple way to reproduce it:

Open a Safari window, move mouse to address bar. Click to bring the focus to the address bar. Click and hold mouse button (icon changes to I-beam) while moving due left. Release mouse button once you are in the grey area.

It is expected that the mouse button changes back to pointer when mouse button is released outside of the address bar area. Instead it remains the I-beam. You can move to the window control traffic lights and the icon remains the I-beam.

Not happening on any of my Macs, the moment you click and hold then move, it becomes a cursor, not an I-beam here.

Hopefully, Apple figures it out for you. I can agree this bug would be extremely annoying if it was happening to me.
 
Having used both Aperture and iPhoto extensively since 2008, I feel that Photos really does slot in pretty much between Aperture and iPhoto, and once 3rd parties begin to produce Extensions, a lot of what may have originally been lacking could be reintroduced. It's a brilliant model actually - Apple creates the shell of the app, which covers organization, important controls and features, and sharing FOR FREE, then 3rd parties can create additional functionality that can be sold on as as-needed basis. Want to brush in adjustments? Buy an extension. Want to do more to your metadata and GPS location? Buy an extension. You can make your version of Photos as streamlined or complex as you need it to be.

A lot of the editing controls are hidden by default, and it requires you to use folders and Albums structure differently if you liked to compartmentalize your shoots by events. However, I have found that the Moments works well enough that I rarely need to create additional albums. The thing I miss most from Aperture is the ability to brush adjustments in, or apply adjustments to just midtones, highlights, etc.

A feature that I thought I would get in use out of but can now say otherwise is iCloud shared Albums. My family and I went to Comicon this past weekend armed with 4 iPhones, a Nikon DSLR and a Fuji mirrorless. After such an event, we typically email our best shots around to each other as some like them for their social media, others for albums/projects, others to print. It's a mess sharing all these shots with this many cameras. For this event we used the shared Album functionality. The iPhoneographers made their edits on their iPhones or iPads, and my son and I added our shots to Photos on our respective Macs and made our edits there. When we were all finished, we all just dragged out best shots into a Comicon iCloud shared album, and these were instantly available to everyone on all of their respective devices. No sharing of iCloud accounts, no sharing of libraries, no emailing images or putting them on memory sticks - they just showed up. I can see using this quite a bit.

Yep, that should basically be the photos description on apples website. Photos covers the basic user needs and as you said a lot of people probably miss the hidden controls.
Extensions is where the real meat lies and just using some in ios 8 (doodle and photo lab = awesomeness) gives you a sneak peak of what's possible. Apples model is great and it was never going to please the hardcore photographers and editors. It's the same with iMovie, it's not aimed at the niche of professionals but at the people that made them the most valuable company, the casual consumer. I like it a lot :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.