Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Now is the time for customers of photobucket to start deleting content from their account because this is where the terms and conditions will be abused because AI as it is now was not around when picture and video hosting sites were around therefore what could be done with pictures and videos by the host were limited. Now we are seeing tech companies that are building AI approaching other tech companies so they can have access to their databases so they can train their AI. The content of these hosting sites are the private property of the account holder and whilst the original terms and conditions may have something inside them that state the account holder upon uploading images or videos gives the host certain rights over the use of that content. I seriously doubt account holders envisioned everything in their account would be sieved up by an AI bot so it can learn.

In my opinion this is abuse by the hosts of their users content. Photobucket will make millions of $$$ from Apple for images and videos that do not belong to them and I have no doubt photobucket will not compensate any of it's users for allowing an AI bot to trawl through everything they own.

People need to get wise to this abuse. AI makers wanting to access other tech companies databases so the AI bot can learn, databases that contain the privately owned content of it's users. The host making millions from deals with AI bot makers for content they do not own whilst sticking two fingers up at account holders saying 'tough, go look at the T&C's, we can do whatever we want with your content'.

Look at the backlash from Apple users when Apple said they were going to implement a system where their images will get scanned. Privately owned pictures getting scanned!!!! Apple users was never going to allow it the result being Apple dropped the system (for now). That backlash just goes to show how owners of images and video's feel about companies intrusion into what they privately own. Therefore account holders of image and video host sites need to be very wary too because once an AI bot scans through whatever it is scanning, it can use what it has learnt to create things. How many photobucket users will see their images pop up in AI made images for advertisers and marketing campaigns.

If Apple succeeds in getting a deal, how many other AI bot makers will approach photobucket looking for a deal. Sites making millions upon millions of $$$ from content it does not own.
 
One thing that will be very interesting going forward, is to see just how long it will take for Apple to catch OpenAI.
If it only takes a year, or less (I highly doubt it), OpenAI as a company should be worthless. If you can easily "buy" yourself to the top, what is the worth of an AI company?
What exactly is the business model of an AI company anyways? Microsoft seems to think that AI can help add more value to their platform, but are you hoping to break even from university students paying $20 a month to have it type their essays for them?

It looks like another Siri situation where Apple wins by virtue of having deep pockets and the ability to control defaults on their hardware. Who cares how good alternatives like google assistant or Alexa are when Siri is the default digital assistant on your apple devices? When I perform a quick calculation on my Apple Watch, it's Siri feeding me the answer.

Same here. However good openAI may be, it's still an app on your iPhone you have to manually open in order to use. It will never be as integrated into the Apple ecosystem as Apple's own offering and at the end of the day, that's really how Apple "wins".
 
Fix Siri first. Apple needs to crawl before it can walk. Siri is terrible. It's 2024 and I still get routine Apple Music requests misinterpreted and instead get served some totally random rap playlist. Most times I'm unsuccessful trying to add a song to my library through a very clear, simple command. Some home automations literally work half of the time with the same exact commands.

I'm hesitating investing more into Homekit products because of Apple's inability to make simple AI work. Start with that guys, then move onto the fancy, nice-to-have stuff.
 
🤔 -💵-
If Shutterstock has 400 million photos [which they did in 2022] and Apple payed them 50 million. Each contributor should get around $.05 per photo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gasu E.
Doesn't it seem a bit late to be seeking licensing now for something allegedly to be revealed at WWDC?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.