Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is just a blatant attempt to generate corporate propaganda via a deceptive message that "Apple Cares" about developers and Apps are a lucrative business. Sure, they will show a bunch of developers "making it big" in the Apps business, but the reality is the "winners" on the show will only make it due to Apple astro-turfing (featuring) their Apps. Making money on "penny" Apps is dead, and Apple killed it by their stupid developer program / App Store policies.
 
They should have called it 'Celebrity APPrentice.' And I have to tell you, it's gonna be the greatest show ever folks. Of all time. I really mean that. Yes that's my hair. Of all time.
Until they get sued by Trump's organization.
 
This is just a blatant attempt to generate corporate propaganda via a deceptive message that "Apple Cares" about developers and Apps are a lucrative business. Sure, they will show a bunch of developers "making it big" in the Apps business, but the reality is the "winners" on the show will only make it due to Apple astro-turfing (featuring) their Apps. Making money on "penny" Apps is dead, and Apple killed it by their stupid developer program / App Store policies.

This.

Apps are actually dying en masse; this is yet another attempt at smoke and mirrors to try and divert attention away from that fact. The long-term health of apps has a poor prognosis due to the reasons you state. In particular, I do not think that the future of tv is apps; far from it. I think to try and fit tv into the apps model was a big mistake and now that won't succeed.

Why can't Apple do services well? I think they have the wrong culture for it. Amazon and Google are both far, far better at services. In an ideal world, Apple would simply hand over control of their services to those two and concentrate their attention on hardware and possibly software.
 
This.

Apps are actually dying en masse; this is yet another attempt at smoke and mirrors to try and divert attention away from that fact. The long-term health of apps has a poor prognosis due to the reasons you state. In particular, I do not think that the future of tv is apps; far from it. I think to try and fit tv into the apps model was a big mistake and now that won't succeed.

Why can't Apple do services well? I think they have the wrong culture for it. Amazon and Google are both far, far better at services. In an ideal world, Apple would simply hand over control of their services to those two and concentrate their attention on hardware and possibly software.

Mr. Frost gets it :)

Yes, dying, or basically dead already...

But actually being KILLED by Apple's own stupidity. Selling mobile software for a few bucks per copy was a decent business opportunity with the potential to sell on a device in everyone's pocket (compared to at home on their desktop - or laptop). But Apple killed that proposition by forcing family share on developers - this killed small operations that yes, were the ones (like me) who "had the courage" to try crazy ideas that "changed the world".. but that was back in the early days when Apple NEEDED us to bolster their new pocket computing platform with Apps. They also removed simple discoverability features from the store (category sort by release date), and added the mysterious "Featuring" system to the obfuscated approval process... All these forced on developers by Apple, who by the way, is a hardware company and has never made a SINGLE DOLLAR PROFIT from selling software - think about that last point for a moment....

So now they've degraded to to hand picking (featured) apps that really are just referred by their "Pedigreed chums" via school contacts or VC funding... It's not what you know, it's who you know.... (see Anki Drive app for example)...

Very sad - iOS could have been a great platform for the foreseeable future, but now it's headed to the ~5% (traditional) market share that Apple has gone out of business at least once trying to exist in. Apple TV and Watch are also doomed to the same stupid mindset. Watch died exactly for the opposite reason iPhone succeeded initially - no way to charge for watch extensions.. Apple TV is dead for the same because if you don't sell via universal purchase your app will never get featured.

Free is always the "best customer experience" but the only thing that is universally free is nothing....
 
Why aren't they focusing on Macbook p....oh wait

Why does every thread start with a MacBook comment, when this thread has nothing to do with the MacBook.....Oh wait.

Back on topic. Apple obviously has to focus on their developers. I think developers would find this motivating to be creative and others will find out how the developing process actually operates.
 
I'm predicting that by 2022, the next generation (the Bilennials) will start pronouncing the word 'app' to sound like apes. Blame goes to Apple.

Example: "Hey did you download Angry Birds 5 from the Ape Store yet?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: amegicfox
Although I'm tempted to join the pile-on and lament what Apple has become, it's possible this whole thing is a bit of harmless fun and excitement for the benefit of developers at next year's WWDC...

Yeah, no harm in putting some time and energy into this. After all, Apple has all the other facets of their business in solid shape right now. :rolleyes:
 
Yeah, no harm in putting some time and energy into this. After all, Apple has all the other facets of their business in solid shape right now. :rolleyes:
Yeah, especially since the same marketing/business people can really help out with hardware and software design and development.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Solomani
Hey, I have an idea, let's get some software developers and have them mentor and critique actors and singers like Gwenyth Paltrow, Jessica Alba, and will.i.am. It makes so much sense, right?

Alba co-founded a company that is worth a billion dollars now. I think that makes some sense, she probably knows how to brand a product.
 
Alba co-founded a company that is worth a billion dollars now. I think that makes some sense, she probably knows how to brand a product.
Or use her popularity and related connections and so on, which the vast majority of regular people don't have.
 



Earlier this year, Apple posted an open casting call for its upcoming original TV show Planet of the Apps, an unscripted series about apps and the talented developers who make them. The show will serve as a "launch pad" and "accelerator" for up to 100 developers, who will receive mentorship from influencers and entrepreneurs such as Gary Vaynerchuk, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jessica Alba, and will.i.am.

App-Store-About-800x369.jpg

Details surrounding the show are still vague, including when it will air in 2017 and how it will be distributed, but the basic premise draws similarities to Shark Tank. Developers will pitch their apps, and those who make it to the final round will meet with top-tier venture capitalists investing up to $10 million over the course of the season, and receive featured placement in the App Store at the end of the show.

Apple accepted applications to be on the show until late September, and we have since learned some of the details about the step-by-step process from a developer selected to be on the show.

The person, who wishes to remain anonymous due to their involvement, said the application process involved four stages:
o First Round: The developer submitted a standard online application on the Planet of the Apps website, including a one-minute video, basic information about the app, and screenshots. Shortly afterwards, he received a phone call from a casting director in Los Angeles, who notified him that he was selected to move on to the next round. The casting director asked him several questions about how he thought of the idea, and why he wanted to be on the show.

o Second Round: The developer was instructed to pitch his app by creating a longer 5-10 minute unedited video that would be professionally edited by the show's staff and then shown to the producers directly. His team was given two weeks to finish this video. The producers provided a checklist of topics to focus on in the video, including how the app works, what makes it unique, how much money desired, and how the money would be used.

In addition, the developers were required to mail in a lengthy application package about the app and an Audition Release granting Apple permission to edit or use the video in any way.

o Third Round: The developer was given one week to sign a lengthy contract covering all of the legal issues behind being on the show, such as accepting equity from investors or Apple. The contract package consisted of forms such as a Participant Agreement, Emergency Medical Release, and App Idea Information Form. The contract was accompanied by another short questionnaire about the app, including how many times it has been downloaded.

In addition, the developer was asked to inform the casting coordinators about his team's availability over the next few months. He said developers will be flown out to Los Angeles on three separate occasions, filming for three days upon each visit for a total of nine days of filming.

o Fourth Round: The developer was subjected to a background check. He said the show's coordinators made it clear that, even at this stage, some of the developers would be selected as standby and would not be guaranteed an appearance on the show. Nevertheless, the show's travel team reached out to the developer to begin the process of booking flights for his team in anticipation of them being accepted on the show.Principal filming of Planet of the Apps will begin in Los Angeles later this year and may continue until early 2017. The developer who spoke to us believes the first episodes could air around March or April of next year.

Article Link: Apple Selecting Developers to Appear on 'Planet of the Apps' Next Year
[doublepost=1496878170][/doublepost]This is a worthwhile app. Not some fluff.

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.