Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
These honestly look horrendous, I havent met a person in real life who likes liquid glass. Know so many avoiding installing it on their devices.
If so many people around you are avoiding it, then they aren’t even speaking from experience and just repeat what they’ve heard, opinions based on a few early beta screenshots. It makes no sense to me how someone can look at Apple’s examples and call them horrendous. Even for those who don’t like the transparency, there is something now and the SDKs for developers are more capable than ever.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I dislike Liquid Glass so much I plan on not ever upgrading and additionally choosing non-Apple operating systems and non-Apple hardware in my future purchases.
I have lived and worked in a cross platform environment for a very long time.

Mobile: Android/ iOS
Desktop: macOS/ Linux/ Windows

Remaining current across the board allows me to be very aware of the pros and cons of each. As such I focus on neutrality as much as possible, yet I will be the first to admit a long time moderate bias towards Apple.

Unfortunately as much as I enjoy the exemplary hardware experience and have chosen MacBook Pro models as my primary computer, Apple is testing my patience with the OS shenanigans of late.

While I am used to dealing with, and have a high tolerance for software bugs and inconsistencies over the years, the entire Liquid Glass debacle is a bit much.

Suddenly I'm finding my enthusiasm for macOS and iOS fading, Apple has really thrown a wrench in the works.
 
It's really nice to see the photos at the bottom extend fully downwards, bringing more color and life to the screen, rather than that large flat gray bar. A lot of people may argue this is not 100% "useful" or "necessary", but that's not the point. It looks and feels much nicer.

Cover up the bottom half of both screen shots. Which has a nicer-looking top?
 
First iOS design, Aqua, Brushed metal, Ph lens flare… all fashion elements with expiration date.

But sometimes this jumps are good for distracting users and life is not always about using all the time the right decision
;)

So yes, faking real world in a virtual screen is always a gimmick and fun for a while.

Flat design was proved the perfect design for contemporary 2D screens back in the 2000 thanks to vector tools as Freehand, Illustrator and mainly, Macromedia Flash, only time will put it again where it belongs. It is like jeans, it would be always ready to be there again.
 
The Lucid Motors comparison? Cleaner and sharper in IOS18. Why on god’s holy name did they extend LG to the Watch? It’s hard enough to see in daylight as it is.

Unfortunately it looks like Cupertino has become the new Soviet Union - walled off from the world and believing their own newspapers. One thing is certain - Apple is doubling down on LG. Those of us that don’t like it? Take your Cod Liver Oil little Billy and be grateful. I know it tastes like sh_t and your tummy hurts but - you’ll get better.
 
Ahh, am I just a curmudgeon? For the most part prefer the left-hand screenshots because they're less 'noisy' - a clear interaction zone with the icons. The right-hand animations are mostly floating transparent lozenges that visually flicker and are intermittently illegible.
Yes. It’s because on luiquid glass you have the bottom buttons and also some more at the top of the screen, and they are really big
 
It's overcomplicated, inconsistent (not everything can be transparent, some is glossy and some opaque, some looks realistic 3D and some looks flat...), distracting and wastes resources to get a result that looks arguably worse than the previous design.
The image on the article gives me such heavy Microsoft vibes I have goosebumps.
 
The Lucid Motors comparison? Cleaner and sharper in IOS18. Why on god’s holy name did they extend LG to the Watch? It’s hard enough to see in daylight as it is.

Unfortunately it looks like Cupertino has become the new Soviet Union - walled off from the world and believing their own newspapers. One thing is certain - Apple is doubling down on LG. Those of us that don’t like it? Take your Cod Liver Oil little Billy and be grateful. I know it tastes like sh_t and your tummy hurts but - you’ll get better.
Sure. Apple cannot admit they made mistake. They never do. And not after AI delay disaster. We will stay with GUI to fish for quite long until Apple slowly withdraw some design choices and improve usability in iOS 27 or later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Translucency can work well when paired with skeuomorphism. The visionary Scott Forstall demonstrated that early on in the Mac OS X days.

But translucency doesn’t work well with flat design. Jony Ive tried that with iOS 7, and Apple is doing an extreme amount of it with iOS 26. Liquid Glass, which is glassmorphism, is a variant of flat design.

Flat design needs to be completely purged from every Apple OS. iOS 6-style and Mac OS X Mountain Lion-style skeuomorphism needs to make a comeback. It’s too bad Tim Cook is so clueless and mediocre, that he didn’t see the value in Apple’s most user-friendly offering, which was its skeuomorphic design.
 
Reflective “liquid glass” effects might make sense on mobile devices — after all, you can actually feel the glass and watch the jittery reflections as you move. And sure, for the AVP it’s justified too; there, you’re at least getting the 3D depth illusion these effects were originally meant to evoke.

But on professional desktop systems like an iMac? No one wants a foggy mess of overlapping translucency and restless shimmer while trying to get work done. Still, Apple’s designers, apparently unable to tell the difference between elegant and gimmicky, have forced their toy-store aesthetic onto macOS. The result: an interface that looks smeared rather than sophisticated.

Sadly, not even the legendary Apple Polishing Cloth can wipe away this mess.
MW693_AV2.jpeg

As usual with these kinds of “decisions” (that clearly don’t reflect what most users need), the pendulum is already swinging back. Sooner or later we’ll probably get a full “turn off Liquid Glass” option — and when Apple checks the device analytics (for those who allowed it), they’ll discover only a handful of people voted this was a brilliant idea.

Hopefully, whoever greenlit this nonsense will have to answer for it.

h.png
 
Last edited:


Apple is promoting the new Liquid Glass design in iOS 26, showing off the ways that third-party developers are embracing the aesthetic in their apps. On its developer website, Apple is featuring a visual gallery that demonstrates how "teams of all sizes" are creating Liquid Glass experiences.

Liquid-Glass-General-Feature.jpg

The gallery features examples of Liquid Glass in apps for iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, and Mac. Apple includes comparisons of how each app looked in iOS 18, and how it looks in iOS 26.

Apple's examples feature apps that have eliminated bottom navigation bars in favor of smaller navigation options, apps with Liquid Glass sliders and buttons, and apps using popovers.

Featured apps include Crumbl, Tide Guide, GrowPal, Lumy, Sky Guide, Linearity Curve Graphic Design, LTK, American Airlines, Lowe's, Photoroom, OmniFocus 4, CNN, Essayist, and Lucid Motors.

The design comparisons are best viewed on Apple's site, and are worth checking out if you're curious about how third-party apps are incorporating Liquid Glass.

Article Link: Apple Shares Liquid Glass Design Gallery
Well when you can't realistically grow mobile screen size taller or wider what do you do? You make it deeper of course. Logical and sort of brilliant, if complexity-forward.
 
This liquid glass looks beautiful only in that heading picture. iOS implementation is far from it. Where is it? I don't see it. Looks like it's stretched in real life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CATiNTHESTORE
Add me to the Liquid Glass fan club. It's more impactful on iOS/iPadOS than MacOS but as a fresh coat of paint is really feels different to me. There will be glitches here and there and each .1 release will fix those things.

Is it the radical step forward that Apple is pitching? Of course not - that's just Apple's marketing guff. I'd go as far as saying that it's a step back in some ways, but I can live with that because it looks new and from time to time it's just nice to redecorate.
Dead wrong. The form factor of the mobile phone has, in a matter of a few years, assumed the familiarity (it's key quality) of the toggle light switch we all look for near the doorway into a dark room. Liquid Glass injects a floating ephemeral elusive layer of reality which reduces clarity and focus, unfortunately. It's not as if naysayers are the new luddites but are curating a new thing. Count me in...or out...or there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.