I’m curious how many people were actually using these apps. Before I’d ever build a business model off something I’d think long and hard about whether it was something that could be incorporated into the OS without much difficulty or is something that the OS maker would most likely incorporate into the OS some day. Flashlight apps are a perfect example. On the flip side you have something like Shortcuts. Apple didn’t copy the functionality of Workflow and then tell Workflow they can’t be in the App Store anymore. They bought Workflow and integrated the talent. If these apps were really doing something special that Apple wanted Apple would have bought the app or poached the talent behind it.Why can't Apple require these apps to better explain what data is being exposed in order to remain approved? Or provide an API that those apps could use to gather that data without MDM, in a way that would prompt the user for consent similar to location or notifications? Apple knew that revoking the ability to use MDM would destroy these apps. There's no other way for an app to monitor what's going on with usage on the phone except through MDM. Apple might as well have sent them a letter that says, "We are going to remove your app in April. There is nothing you can do." Can't we have a choice to use some other parental control method than Apple's?