Moving pictures? Like those produced on my $300,00 2014 Lumia 930?
It's not the same thing. Good grief. Is an animated gif the same as a mpeg movie file? NO.
So, again, everyone else's half assed implementation vs Apple's excellent implementation.
Moving pictures? Like those produced on my $300,00 2014 Lumia 930?
I have an iPhone 6s+ and it is very nice. But I have NO applications or usage for the 3D touch. It is useless.
I have NO use for the "live photo" feature either. Tried it and it was too hard to get a good picture and took up lots of space. That feature has been turned off on my phone since the first day. I take a lot of pictures with my iPhone.
My iPhone 6s+ is a big improvement over my iPhone 4 that it replaced, but the newest features are worthless.
I wish I could scrub forward and backward in a live photo to choose a frame I like. So often I like frames that are not in the photo, but in the video embedded before and/or after it. I'd love if Apple implemented that.Live Photos has some great use cases, like pets. The problem is for me using the 6S without OIS they look really bad. A short clip where the whole thing shakes just doesn't look good.
I use siri daily to make phone calls, put remainders, and set up alarms when the phone is charging and I am in bed, far away from my phone, screaming at it ''HEY SIRI!! SET UP AN ALARM FOR 6:00 AM!!'' so I really enjoy it3D Touch has been the opposite of Siri for me. When Siri was announced I thought it would be something I use daily. Here we are four years later and it still isn't something I have worked into my daily reoutine (partially because it often mishears me and "hey siri" activates less than half the time). 3D touch I trash talked on the forums liek no other. "They could have just implemented long press but wanted a new feature", I would say. I use 3D Touch a doozen or my times a day. It is my most used harware feature since Touch ID.
[doublepost=1455772424][/doublepost]
I wish I could scrub forward and backward in a live photo to choose a frame I like. So often I like frames that are not in the photo, but in the video embedded before and/or after it. I'd love if Apple implemented that.
Nice. I was really excited for "hey siri" but I say it and more often than not nothing happens. Unsure why; I have tried setting it up 3-4 times just in cases the setupdidn't take. On ocassion I will use it for things like weather, but I hold down the home button. Doing a google search I find is faster just typing myself. For me, google now just works so much better. :/I don't care what the ad says if Aubrey Plaza is in it <3
[doublepost=1455779090][/doublepost]
I use siri daily to make phone calls, put remainders, and set up alarms when the phone is charging and I am in bed, far away from my phone, screaming at it ''HEY SIRI!! SET UP AN ALARM FOR 6:00 AM!!'' so I really enjoy it![]()
It will not just be another iteration: It will be thinner!They need something to sell the next iPads with.
I also believe google now is a better option but since I live in Turkey and google now is not working here (neither do cortana) my only option is siri. It is really weird that when it works siri is amazing but when it doesnt its one big letdown:/Nice. I was really excited for "hey siri" but I say it and more often than not nothing happens. Unsure why; I have tried setting it up 3-4 times just in cases the setupdidn't take. On ocassion I will use it for things like weather, but I hold down the home button. Doing a google search I find is faster just typing myself. For me, google now just works so much better. :/
I have an iPhone 6s+ and it is very nice. But I have NO applications or usage for the 3D touch. It is useless.
I have NO use for the "live photo" feature either. Tried it and it was too hard to get a good picture and took up lots of space. That feature has been turned off on my phone since the first day. I take a lot of pictures with my iPhone.
My iPhone 6s+ is a big improvement over my iPhone 4 that it replaced, but the newest features are worthless.
3D Touch has been the opposite of Siri for me.
3D Touch is a lame, under-used gimmick that devs just don't care about. Most likely because they know users don't care about it. Live Photos were lame years ago when Nokia invented them and they're still lame after Apple ripped off the idea.
I have NO use for the "live photo" feature either. Tried it and it was too hard to get a good picture and took up lots of space.
That feature has been turned off on my phone since the first day.
I was filled with new hope with the recent Apple TV ad.
These, alas, are more of the bland, snarky-sounding Samsung-like nausea-inducing ads that we had to suffer for so long, albeit not as bad as the worst ones.
Perhaps it's fitting, though; both Live Photos and 3D Touch are gimmicks that don't deserve good ads.
I'd have to disagree. (And of course this is opinion) I think the difference is the tone and handling of the witty humor. It's silly, informative and fun, not in-your-face-these-features-are-so-totally-better-than-your-phone in the way Samsung was (and is) trying to do. They sell the new features, and without bashing others in the process. I think they are quite great!![]()
I saw S6 ads and they were nice especially the wireless charging ad was very funny!Curious to see how Samsung will advertise their versions.
3d touch ad was nice and funny, ...missed the flight lol! she's hot! however the other ads were not that great
[doublepost=1455795119][/doublepost]
I saw S6 ads and they were nice especially the wireless charging ad was very funny!
Perhaps it's fitting, though; both Live Photos and 3D Touch are gimmicks that don't deserve good ads.