Everybody can't be Mother NatureHas Apple ever had more cringe commercials than these? I'm serious

Everybody can't be Mother NatureHas Apple ever had more cringe commercials than these? I'm serious
"AI" is not some new revolutionary thing.I wonder if the real problem is that AI has the potential to be immensely powerful but no one has really figured out how to deploy it
You're quoting it wrong.The capabilities and interface of the writing tools are very bad. Very awkward to use. And the results are just OK.
Edit: I am actually surprised. Apple worked on it for so long, and they ended up with this? On a positive note, the photo clean up feature works well enough for me.
Edit 2: Also, I tried the writing tool on some statements on a polemical essay I have been working on, and a message says the writing tool was "not designed for this type of content." 😂 It's not adult content or extremist content. It's just that the tone was a bit polemical and it tripped Apple's circuit breaker. 🤷♂️
These ideas are actually a significant improvement over the tasteless drivel commercials that Apple came up with this time.Something fun about macrumors is it’s against the rules to publish AI written content. Gonna be interesting how they deal with that soon!
Regardless, here’s how GPT came up with a better ad campaign than these two. Read it now before it gets deleted!
<snip>
These concepts take the focus entirely away from productivity and practicality, instead celebrating the sheer fun of turning ordinary moments into something unexpectedly delightful. They showcase AI as a tool for creativity and humor, rather than efficiency.
I'd agree with you on much of this, although the Touch Bar was actually not a bad concept IMHO, and could have been useful in theory. YMMVThe AI stuff is of highly questionable utility, Siri still sucks, Car was a waste of time and money, AVP was a flop of biblical proportions.... this is on the heels of the AirPower failure, Butterfly keyboard massive mishap, TouchBar mistake... on ... and on.. and on...
Introducing Apple's revolutionary new concept. And we call it Touch Screen.I'd agree with you on much of this, although the Touch Bar was actually not a bad concept IMHO, and could have been useful in theory. YMMV
Ooh I hope Apple’s Marketing team gotta be first for the great replacement. At least we will see “Apple Intelligence” in real action🤣you're likely to be replaced soon by AI.
Usually do not care re: ads, but these (notably the office worker) are very, very, very cringe. Hopefully AI helps those striving to achieve greater things accomplish even more, rather than cover up laziness. Could greater accomplishment not have been your theme Apple ??? That office commercial... WOW. Does Warren work in Apple's software QA dept ?? If so, then explains a lot last few years. Also, not that anyone cares but me, I HATE the colorization of these ads. Remember the Apple logo with bright colors, these ads are the antithesis. I know dull, highly-tinted is considered cool, but it just drains the life/interest from me -- world is a colorful, beautiful place.
Agreed it is all software, but the difference is the implementation detail of the feature. The current models being employed are generally multi-modal transformers (branded "AI"). These are larger neural networks with tons of weights (billions). The computational cost for inference is therefore much higher than previous methods. Specialized hardware (more gpu-like) helps with the efficiency of large-scale linear algebra in the inference stage. In contrast, old models could be shallow logistic regression on n-grams attached to a beam search."AI" is not some new revolutionary thing.
It's just a buzzword for certain types of software.
The photo replacement stuff has been possible in photo editing software suites like Lightroom and GIMP for YEARS.
The text re-writing stuff has been available through services like Grammarly.
The video creation tools -- Capcut has offered that for years and even the TikTok app can automatically apply filters, montage photos and videos, and add music.
None of this required any sort of specialized hardware or new AI chips or anything. It's off the shelf software that works on any Windows 7 machine.
Sure, what they are calling "AI" is more powerful / invasive software than we had in the past. Because that's what technology does. I agree it would be really interesting to see the direction Steve Jobs* would have gone over the past few years.
There is no evidence we are close to getting anything like the Ex Machina / AI -- Steven Speilberg / Stanley Kubrick form of "AI" - ie conscious self sufficient robotic life with artificial intelligence. And many argue that's not even possible. Until then we are dealing with a much more basic question of "what can we do with software and how should we deploy it." AI is just a buzzword.
*FYI I heard an interesting podcast lately from a long time Apple manager about Steve Jobs' legacy, Tim Cook, privacy, AI, and the future direction of Apple.
Deus Ex Machina - Apple and the Ghost of Steve Jobs - (Myth20c-Ep270)
![]()
Myth of the 20th Century - Deus Ex Machina - Apple and the Ghost of Steve Jobs (Myth20c - Ep270)
Listen to Myth of the 20th Century - Deus Ex Machina - Apple and the Ghost of Steve Jobs (Myth20c - Ep270) by Hank Oslo on Podcast Addict. Since its founding in 1976, Apple has been at or near the center of personal computing. Led by legendary founder Steve Jobs, who described the company as...podcastaddict.com
Uhhh, but these significantly improved ideas were by AI. I know because I prompted it to just keep coming up with ideas which were more novel. Don’t you understand that these AI “ideas” are raising the content of “my” work. Like it’s literally replacing it. I don’t think you’re thinking this through entirely.These ideas are actually a significant improvement over the tasteless drivel commercials that Apple came up with this time.
It just goes to show that if you're not raising the bar with your work, and you are content with producing drivel that you think is going to pander to the masses, you're likely to be replaced soon by AI.
And the woman walks away from her family to the camera with a kinda sad, checked out look on her face. The rest of the family is happy and together with the dad, but she seems miserable. Leaves me feeling pity for her and the family dynamic.
Ads should make you feel good after you watch it, so you feel about the company and product…
Oh, I see. I was just weighing the apparent quality of what AI generated vs. what Apple’s marketing team apparently generated without AI (maybe?). I do see the pitfalls in allowing AI to replace what we are doing. Is that what you’re trying to say?Uhhh, but these significantly improved ideas were by AI. I know because I prompted it to just keep coming up with ideas which were more novel. Don’t you understand that these AI “ideas” are raising the content of “my” work. Like it’s literally replacing it. I don’t think you’re thinking this through entirely.
I don’t think it’s a pitfall. I’m saying it doesn’t matter how “quality” your work is. AI will replace craft. Utterly and totally. Except for the very rare instances of life where the labor is the product, live acoustic music (no microphones to “fix” it) live theatre, ballet, uhh, puppet shows (maybe!), as long as it’s not animatronics those will be better with AIOh, I see. I was just weighing the apparent quality of what AI generated vs. what Apple’s marketing team apparently generated without AI (maybe?). I do see the pitfalls in allowing AI to replace what we are doing. Is that what you’re trying to say?
But nearly everything that can be put on the internet will be made by AI. Almost all of it. Including this comment section..
Depends on your definition of compelling. The only thing AI won’t replace on the internet is the stuff that’s out of ‘alignment’ (racism, sexism, etc.) AI won’t touch that. But everything else with a computer? AI will do it better, faster, cheaper, and with more iterations than humans ever could.I guess in that scenario, I just wonder how compelling the actual Internet will be at that point and whether we will even be here looking at it if that’s what it’s made of